"Unfocus" on foc.us: commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory

Standard

"Unfocus" on foc.us: commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory. / Steenbergen, Laura; Sellaro, Roberta; Hommel, Bernhard; Lindenberger, Ulman; Kühn, Simone; Colzato, Lorenza S.

in: EXP BRAIN RES, 18.08.2015.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Steenbergen, L., Sellaro, R., Hommel, B., Lindenberger, U., Kühn, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2015). "Unfocus" on foc.us: commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory. EXP BRAIN RES. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4391-9

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{aaba3f567723435fa04e358cf0263ae4,
title = "{"}Unfocus{"} on foc.us: commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory",
abstract = "In this study, we tested whether the commercial transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) headset foc.us improves cognitive performance, as advertised in the media. A single-blind, sham-controlled, within-subject design was used to assess the effect of online and off-line foc.us tDCS-applied over the prefrontal cortex in healthy young volunteers (n = 24) on working memory (WM) updating and monitoring. WM updating and monitoring, as assessed by means of the N-back task, is a cognitive-control process that has been shown to benefit from interventions with CE-certified tDCS devices. For both online and off-line stimulation protocols, results showed that active stimulation with foc.us, compared to sham stimulation, significantly decreased accuracy performance in a well-established task tapping WM updating and monitoring. These results provide evidence for the important role of the scientific community in validating and testing far-reaching claims made by the brain training industry.",
author = "Laura Steenbergen and Roberta Sellaro and Bernhard Hommel and Ulman Lindenberger and Simone K{\"u}hn and Colzato, {Lorenza S}",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-015-4391-9",
language = "English",
journal = "EXP BRAIN RES",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Unfocus" on foc.us: commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory

AU - Steenbergen, Laura

AU - Sellaro, Roberta

AU - Hommel, Bernhard

AU - Lindenberger, Ulman

AU - Kühn, Simone

AU - Colzato, Lorenza S

PY - 2015/8/18

Y1 - 2015/8/18

N2 - In this study, we tested whether the commercial transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) headset foc.us improves cognitive performance, as advertised in the media. A single-blind, sham-controlled, within-subject design was used to assess the effect of online and off-line foc.us tDCS-applied over the prefrontal cortex in healthy young volunteers (n = 24) on working memory (WM) updating and monitoring. WM updating and monitoring, as assessed by means of the N-back task, is a cognitive-control process that has been shown to benefit from interventions with CE-certified tDCS devices. For both online and off-line stimulation protocols, results showed that active stimulation with foc.us, compared to sham stimulation, significantly decreased accuracy performance in a well-established task tapping WM updating and monitoring. These results provide evidence for the important role of the scientific community in validating and testing far-reaching claims made by the brain training industry.

AB - In this study, we tested whether the commercial transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) headset foc.us improves cognitive performance, as advertised in the media. A single-blind, sham-controlled, within-subject design was used to assess the effect of online and off-line foc.us tDCS-applied over the prefrontal cortex in healthy young volunteers (n = 24) on working memory (WM) updating and monitoring. WM updating and monitoring, as assessed by means of the N-back task, is a cognitive-control process that has been shown to benefit from interventions with CE-certified tDCS devices. For both online and off-line stimulation protocols, results showed that active stimulation with foc.us, compared to sham stimulation, significantly decreased accuracy performance in a well-established task tapping WM updating and monitoring. These results provide evidence for the important role of the scientific community in validating and testing far-reaching claims made by the brain training industry.

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-015-4391-9

DO - 10.1007/s00221-015-4391-9

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26280313

JO - EXP BRAIN RES

JF - EXP BRAIN RES

SN - 0014-4819

ER -