Understanding the barriers and myths limiting the use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: results of a survey of European/Canadian healthcare providers

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the barriers and myths limiting the use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: results of a survey of European/Canadian healthcare providers

AU - Buhling, Kai J

AU - Hauck, Brian

AU - Dermout, Sylvia

AU - Ardaens, Katty

AU - Marions, Lena

N1 - Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate healthcare providers' (HCPs') knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding intrauterine contraception (IUC).STUDY DESIGN: HCPs in eight European countries and Canada who saw at least 20 women per month for contraception completed an online questionnaire. Responses were evaluated by country.RESULTS: In total, 1103 HCPs completed the survey: 633 obstetrician-gynecologists, 335 general practitioners and 135 family planning clinicians (physician, midwife or nurse). When respondents in different countries were asked to report their three main barriers to considering IUC, predominant concerns were nulliparity (34-69%) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID; 14-83%) for women in general, and insertion difficulty (25-83%), PID (17-83%), insertion pain (7-60%) and infertility (6-55%) for nulliparous women. In addition, 4-59% of HCPs reported that they never proactively include IUC in contraceptive counseling for a nulliparous woman, regardless of her age. Furthermore, only 30-61% of respondents correctly identified that, in the World Health Organization medical eligibility criteria for IUC, nulliparity is category 2 (benefits outweigh risks).CONCLUSIONS: HCPs in Europe and Canada have clear gaps in their knowledge regarding IUC and misplaced concerns persist, particularly regarding use of IUC in nulliparous women; the predominant misconceptions are about PID, insertion difficulty and insertion pain. Further education on the evidence is needed so that IUC is recognized as being suitable for young and nulliparous women and is included in contraceptive counseling.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate healthcare providers' (HCPs') knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding intrauterine contraception (IUC).STUDY DESIGN: HCPs in eight European countries and Canada who saw at least 20 women per month for contraception completed an online questionnaire. Responses were evaluated by country.RESULTS: In total, 1103 HCPs completed the survey: 633 obstetrician-gynecologists, 335 general practitioners and 135 family planning clinicians (physician, midwife or nurse). When respondents in different countries were asked to report their three main barriers to considering IUC, predominant concerns were nulliparity (34-69%) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID; 14-83%) for women in general, and insertion difficulty (25-83%), PID (17-83%), insertion pain (7-60%) and infertility (6-55%) for nulliparous women. In addition, 4-59% of HCPs reported that they never proactively include IUC in contraceptive counseling for a nulliparous woman, regardless of her age. Furthermore, only 30-61% of respondents correctly identified that, in the World Health Organization medical eligibility criteria for IUC, nulliparity is category 2 (benefits outweigh risks).CONCLUSIONS: HCPs in Europe and Canada have clear gaps in their knowledge regarding IUC and misplaced concerns persist, particularly regarding use of IUC in nulliparous women; the predominant misconceptions are about PID, insertion difficulty and insertion pain. Further education on the evidence is needed so that IUC is recognized as being suitable for young and nulliparous women and is included in contraceptive counseling.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.020

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25461369

VL - 183

SP - 146

EP - 154

JO - EUR J OBSTET GYN R B

JF - EUR J OBSTET GYN R B

SN - 0301-2115

ER -