Two simple and inexpensive methods for preparing DNA suitable for digital PCR from a small number of cells in 96-well plates
Standard
Two simple and inexpensive methods for preparing DNA suitable for digital PCR from a small number of cells in 96-well plates. / Zou, Ziang; Guo, Linna; Ahmadi, Parimah; Hartjen, Philip; Gosau, Martin; Smeets, Ralf; Kluwe, Lan.
in: J CLIN LAB ANAL, Jahrgang 35, Nr. 1, 01.2021, S. e23513.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Two simple and inexpensive methods for preparing DNA suitable for digital PCR from a small number of cells in 96-well plates
AU - Zou, Ziang
AU - Guo, Linna
AU - Ahmadi, Parimah
AU - Hartjen, Philip
AU - Gosau, Martin
AU - Smeets, Ralf
AU - Kluwe, Lan
N1 - © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Although DNA of high quality can be easily prepared from cultured cells with commercially available kits, many studies involve a large number of samples which increases the cost drastically. We optimized two simple and inexpensive methods for preparing DNA suitable for digital PCR from a small number of cells directly from wells of 96-well plates.METHODS: Cells (number: 103 -104 ) were lysed with a Direct PCR® lysis buffer or a 10% Chelex100® solution. The lysates were further purified and concentrated by means of DNA precipitation with a blue-colored glycogen as a carrier. PCR and digital PCR were used to evaluate the efficiency of the two methods.RESULTS: For 1000 cells from one primary culture and two tumor cell lines, DNA was reproducible and obtained with recovery rate (obtained/expected amount of DNA) in the range of 50%-90% as measured by the fluorometer dyes instrument Qubit. Using 8 out of a total of 10 µL DNA solution for 1000 cells, both conventional PCR and digital PCR were successful. For digital PCR, more than 1600 positive droplets were obtained for DNA from 1000 cells using the Direct PCR® method, corresponding to a yield efficiency of approximately 80%. Further reducing the number of cells down to 100 would be possible with 160 positive droplets expected. Both reagents are inexpensive (0.08€/sample).CONCLUSIONS: Two methods are efficient, especially the Direct PCR® reagent-based method provides a simple and inexpensive method for preparing DNA suitable for digital PCR from small number of cells.
AB - BACKGROUND: Although DNA of high quality can be easily prepared from cultured cells with commercially available kits, many studies involve a large number of samples which increases the cost drastically. We optimized two simple and inexpensive methods for preparing DNA suitable for digital PCR from a small number of cells directly from wells of 96-well plates.METHODS: Cells (number: 103 -104 ) were lysed with a Direct PCR® lysis buffer or a 10% Chelex100® solution. The lysates were further purified and concentrated by means of DNA precipitation with a blue-colored glycogen as a carrier. PCR and digital PCR were used to evaluate the efficiency of the two methods.RESULTS: For 1000 cells from one primary culture and two tumor cell lines, DNA was reproducible and obtained with recovery rate (obtained/expected amount of DNA) in the range of 50%-90% as measured by the fluorometer dyes instrument Qubit. Using 8 out of a total of 10 µL DNA solution for 1000 cells, both conventional PCR and digital PCR were successful. For digital PCR, more than 1600 positive droplets were obtained for DNA from 1000 cells using the Direct PCR® method, corresponding to a yield efficiency of approximately 80%. Further reducing the number of cells down to 100 would be possible with 160 positive droplets expected. Both reagents are inexpensive (0.08€/sample).CONCLUSIONS: Two methods are efficient, especially the Direct PCR® reagent-based method provides a simple and inexpensive method for preparing DNA suitable for digital PCR from small number of cells.
U2 - 10.1002/jcla.23513
DO - 10.1002/jcla.23513
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 32761657
VL - 35
SP - e23513
JO - J CLIN LAB ANAL
JF - J CLIN LAB ANAL
SN - 0887-8013
IS - 1
ER -