Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Medical Therapy for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison
Standard
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Medical Therapy for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison. / Ludwig, Sebastian; Conradi, Lenard; Cohen, David J; Coisne, Augustin; Scotti, Andrea; Abraham, William T; Ben Ali, Walid; Zhou, Zhipeng; Li, Yanru; Kar, Saibal; Duncan, Alison; Lim, D Scott; Adamo, Marianna; Redfors, Björn; Muller, David W M; Webb, John G; Petronio, Anna S; Ruge, Hendrik; Nickenig, Georg; Sondergaard, Lars; Adam, Matti; Regazzoli, Damiano; Garatti, Andrea; Schmidt, Tobias; Andreas, Martin; Dahle, Gry; Walther, Thomas; Kempfert, Joerg; Tang, Gilbert H L; Redwood, Simon; Taramasso, Maurizio; Praz, Fabien; Fam, Neil; Dumonteil, Nicolas; Obadia, Jean-François; von Bardeleben, Ralph Stephan; Rudolph, Tanja K; Reardon, Michael J; Metra, Marco; Denti, Paolo; Mack, Michael J; Hausleiter, Jörg; Asch, Federico M; Latib, Azeem; Lindenfeld, JoAnn; Modine, Thomas; Stone, Gregg W; Granada, Juan F; CHOICE-MI and the COAPT Trial Investigators.
in: CIRC-CARDIOVASC INTE, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 6, 06.2023, S. e013045.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Medical Therapy for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison
AU - Ludwig, Sebastian
AU - Conradi, Lenard
AU - Cohen, David J
AU - Coisne, Augustin
AU - Scotti, Andrea
AU - Abraham, William T
AU - Ben Ali, Walid
AU - Zhou, Zhipeng
AU - Li, Yanru
AU - Kar, Saibal
AU - Duncan, Alison
AU - Lim, D Scott
AU - Adamo, Marianna
AU - Redfors, Björn
AU - Muller, David W M
AU - Webb, John G
AU - Petronio, Anna S
AU - Ruge, Hendrik
AU - Nickenig, Georg
AU - Sondergaard, Lars
AU - Adam, Matti
AU - Regazzoli, Damiano
AU - Garatti, Andrea
AU - Schmidt, Tobias
AU - Andreas, Martin
AU - Dahle, Gry
AU - Walther, Thomas
AU - Kempfert, Joerg
AU - Tang, Gilbert H L
AU - Redwood, Simon
AU - Taramasso, Maurizio
AU - Praz, Fabien
AU - Fam, Neil
AU - Dumonteil, Nicolas
AU - Obadia, Jean-François
AU - von Bardeleben, Ralph Stephan
AU - Rudolph, Tanja K
AU - Reardon, Michael J
AU - Metra, Marco
AU - Denti, Paolo
AU - Mack, Michael J
AU - Hausleiter, Jörg
AU - Asch, Federico M
AU - Latib, Azeem
AU - Lindenfeld, JoAnn
AU - Modine, Thomas
AU - Stone, Gregg W
AU - Granada, Juan F
AU - CHOICE-MI and the COAPT Trial Investigators
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is an emerging therapeutic alternative for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Outcomes of TMVR versus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) have not been investigated for this population. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of patients with secondary MR undergoing TMVR versus GDMT alone.METHODS: The CHOICE-MI registry (Choice of Optimal Transcatheter Treatment for Mitral Insufficiency) included patients with MR undergoing TMVR using dedicated devices. Patients with MR pathogeneses other than secondary MR were excluded. Patients treated with GDMT alone were derived from the control arm of the COAPT trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation). We compared outcomes between the TMVR and GDMT groups, using propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences.RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 97 patient pairs undergoing TMVR (72.9±8.7 years; 60.8% men; transapical access, 91.8%) versus GDMT (73.1±11.0 years; 59.8% men) were compared. At 1 and 2 years, residual MR was ≤1+ in all patients of the TMVR group compared with 6.9% and 7.7%, respectively, in those receiving GDMT alone (both P<0.001). The 2-year rate of heart failure hospitalization was significantly lower in the TMVR group (32.8% versus 54.4%; hazard ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.99]; P=0.04). Among survivors, a higher proportion of patients were in the New York Heart Association functional class I or II in the TMVR group at 1 year (78.2% versus 59.7%; P=0.03) and at 2 years (77.8% versus 53.2%; P=0.09). Two-year mortality was similar in the 2 groups (TMVR versus GDMT, 36.8% versus 40.8%; hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.62-1.64]; P=0.98).CONCLUSIONS: In this observational comparison, over 2-year follow-up, TMVR using mostly transapical devices in patients with secondary MR was associated with significant reduction of MR, symptomatic improvement, less frequent hospitalizations for heart failure, and similar mortality compared with GDMT.REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04688190 (CHOICE-MI) and NCT01626079 (COAPT).
AB - BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is an emerging therapeutic alternative for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). Outcomes of TMVR versus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) have not been investigated for this population. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of patients with secondary MR undergoing TMVR versus GDMT alone.METHODS: The CHOICE-MI registry (Choice of Optimal Transcatheter Treatment for Mitral Insufficiency) included patients with MR undergoing TMVR using dedicated devices. Patients with MR pathogeneses other than secondary MR were excluded. Patients treated with GDMT alone were derived from the control arm of the COAPT trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation). We compared outcomes between the TMVR and GDMT groups, using propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences.RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 97 patient pairs undergoing TMVR (72.9±8.7 years; 60.8% men; transapical access, 91.8%) versus GDMT (73.1±11.0 years; 59.8% men) were compared. At 1 and 2 years, residual MR was ≤1+ in all patients of the TMVR group compared with 6.9% and 7.7%, respectively, in those receiving GDMT alone (both P<0.001). The 2-year rate of heart failure hospitalization was significantly lower in the TMVR group (32.8% versus 54.4%; hazard ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.99]; P=0.04). Among survivors, a higher proportion of patients were in the New York Heart Association functional class I or II in the TMVR group at 1 year (78.2% versus 59.7%; P=0.03) and at 2 years (77.8% versus 53.2%; P=0.09). Two-year mortality was similar in the 2 groups (TMVR versus GDMT, 36.8% versus 40.8%; hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.62-1.64]; P=0.98).CONCLUSIONS: In this observational comparison, over 2-year follow-up, TMVR using mostly transapical devices in patients with secondary MR was associated with significant reduction of MR, symptomatic improvement, less frequent hospitalizations for heart failure, and similar mortality compared with GDMT.REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04688190 (CHOICE-MI) and NCT01626079 (COAPT).
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects
KW - Heart Failure/etiology
KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
KW - Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging
KW - Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging
KW - Propensity Score
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013045
DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013045
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 37194288
VL - 16
SP - e013045
JO - CIRC-CARDIOVASC INTE
JF - CIRC-CARDIOVASC INTE
SN - 1941-7640
IS - 6
ER -