Toward an Atlas of Canonical Cognitive Mechanisms

Standard

Toward an Atlas of Canonical Cognitive Mechanisms. / Pirrone, Angelo; Tsetsos, Konstantinos.

in: COGNITIVE SCI, Jahrgang 47, Nr. 2, 02.2023, S. e13243.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungLetterForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9f14b59e50eb4863bbf1df11dab59b72,
title = "Toward an Atlas of Canonical Cognitive Mechanisms",
abstract = "A central goal in Cognitive Science is understanding the mechanisms that underlie cognition. Here, we contend that Cognitive Science, despite intense multidisciplinary efforts, has furnished surprisingly few mechanistic insights. We attribute this slow mechanistic progress to the fact that cognitive scientists insist on performing underdetermined exercises, deriving overparametrized mechanistic theories of complex behaviors and seeking validation of these theories to the elusive notions of optimality and biological plausibility. We propose that mechanistic progress in Cognitive Science will accelerate once cognitive scientists start focusing on simpler explananda that will enable them to chart an atlas of elementary cognitive operations. Looking forward, the next challenge for Cognitive Science will be to understand how these elementary cognitive processes are pieced together to explain complex behavior.",
keywords = "Humans, Cognition, Motivation, Cognitive Science",
author = "Angelo Pirrone and Konstantinos Tsetsos",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2023 Cognitive Science Society LLC.",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1111/cogs.13243",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "e13243",
journal = "COGNITIVE SCI",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward an Atlas of Canonical Cognitive Mechanisms

AU - Pirrone, Angelo

AU - Tsetsos, Konstantinos

N1 - © 2023 Cognitive Science Society LLC.

PY - 2023/2

Y1 - 2023/2

N2 - A central goal in Cognitive Science is understanding the mechanisms that underlie cognition. Here, we contend that Cognitive Science, despite intense multidisciplinary efforts, has furnished surprisingly few mechanistic insights. We attribute this slow mechanistic progress to the fact that cognitive scientists insist on performing underdetermined exercises, deriving overparametrized mechanistic theories of complex behaviors and seeking validation of these theories to the elusive notions of optimality and biological plausibility. We propose that mechanistic progress in Cognitive Science will accelerate once cognitive scientists start focusing on simpler explananda that will enable them to chart an atlas of elementary cognitive operations. Looking forward, the next challenge for Cognitive Science will be to understand how these elementary cognitive processes are pieced together to explain complex behavior.

AB - A central goal in Cognitive Science is understanding the mechanisms that underlie cognition. Here, we contend that Cognitive Science, despite intense multidisciplinary efforts, has furnished surprisingly few mechanistic insights. We attribute this slow mechanistic progress to the fact that cognitive scientists insist on performing underdetermined exercises, deriving overparametrized mechanistic theories of complex behaviors and seeking validation of these theories to the elusive notions of optimality and biological plausibility. We propose that mechanistic progress in Cognitive Science will accelerate once cognitive scientists start focusing on simpler explananda that will enable them to chart an atlas of elementary cognitive operations. Looking forward, the next challenge for Cognitive Science will be to understand how these elementary cognitive processes are pieced together to explain complex behavior.

KW - Humans

KW - Cognition

KW - Motivation

KW - Cognitive Science

U2 - 10.1111/cogs.13243

DO - 10.1111/cogs.13243

M3 - Letter

C2 - 36744746

VL - 47

SP - e13243

JO - COGNITIVE SCI

JF - COGNITIVE SCI

SN - 0364-0213

IS - 2

ER -