PortalPublikationenThe randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenan...

The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance.

Standard

The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance. / Wolfart, S; Marré, B; Wöstmann, B; Kern, M; Mundt, T; Luthardt, R G; Huppertz, J; Hannak, W; Reiber, T; Passia, N; Heydecke, Guido; Reinhardt, W; Hartmann, S; Busche, E; Mitov, G; Stark, H; Pospiech, P; Weber, A; Gernet, W; Walter, M H.

in: J DENT RES, Jahrgang 91, Nr. 7 Suppl, 7 Suppl, 2012.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Wolfart, S, Marré, B, Wöstmann, B, Kern, M, Mundt, T, Luthardt, RG, Huppertz, J, Hannak, W, Reiber, T, Passia, N, Heydecke, G, Reinhardt, W, Hartmann, S, Busche, E, Mitov, G, Stark, H, Pospiech, P, Weber, A, Gernet, W & Walter, MH 2012, 'The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance.', J DENT RES, Jg. 91, Nr. 7 Suppl, 7 Suppl. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22699671?dopt=Citation>

APA

Wolfart, S., Marré, B., Wöstmann, B., Kern, M., Mundt, T., Luthardt, R. G., Huppertz, J., Hannak, W., Reiber, T., Passia, N., Heydecke, G., Reinhardt, W., Hartmann, S., Busche, E., Mitov, G., Stark, H., Pospiech, P., Weber, A., Gernet, W., & Walter, M. H. (2012). The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance. J DENT RES, 91(7 Suppl), [7 Suppl]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22699671?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Wolfart S, Marré B, Wöstmann B, Kern M, Mundt T, Luthardt RG et al. The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance. J DENT RES. 2012;91(7 Suppl). 7 Suppl.

Bibtex

@article{56970d1d40c44b308523e4058f784780,
title = "The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance.",
abstract = "The scientific evidence concerning prosthodontic care for the shortened dental arch (SDA) is sparse. This randomized multicenter study aimed to compare two common treatment options: removable partial dental prostheses (RPDPs) for molar replacement vs. no replacement (SDA). One of the hypotheses was that the follow-up treatment differs between patients with RPDPs and patients with SDAs during the 5-year follow-up period. Two hundred and fifteen patients with complete molar loss in one jaw were included in the study. Molars were either replaced by RPDPs or not replaced according to the SDA concept. A mean number of 4.2 (RPDP) and 2.8 (SDA) treatments for biological or technical reasons occurred during the 5-year observation time per patient. Concerning the biological aspect, no significant differences between the groups could be shown, whereas treatment arising from technical reasons was significantly more frequent for the RPDP group. When the severity of treatment was analyzed, a change over time was evident. When, at baseline, only follow-up treatment with minimal effort is required, over time there is a continuous increase to moderate and extensive effort observed for both groups (Controlled-trials.com number ISRCTN97265367).",
keywords = "Adult, Humans, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Follow-Up Studies, Dental Abutments, Bicuspid/pathology, Dental Arch/*pathology, Denture Design, Denture Precision Attachment, Denture Retention, *Denture, Partial, Removable, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/*rehabilitation, Molar/pathology, Tooth Loss/rehabilitation, Adult, Humans, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Follow-Up Studies, Dental Abutments, Bicuspid/pathology, Dental Arch/*pathology, Denture Design, Denture Precision Attachment, Denture Retention, *Denture, Partial, Removable, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/*rehabilitation, Molar/pathology, Tooth Loss/rehabilitation",
author = "S Wolfart and B Marr{\'e} and B W{\"o}stmann and M Kern and T Mundt and Luthardt, {R G} and J Huppertz and W Hannak and T Reiber and N Passia and Guido Heydecke and W Reinhardt and S Hartmann and E Busche and G Mitov and H Stark and P Pospiech and A Weber and W Gernet and Walter, {M H}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
journal = "J DENT RES",
issn = "0022-0345",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "7 Suppl",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The randomized shortened dental arch study: 5-year maintenance.

AU - Wolfart, S

AU - Marré, B

AU - Wöstmann, B

AU - Kern, M

AU - Mundt, T

AU - Luthardt, R G

AU - Huppertz, J

AU - Hannak, W

AU - Reiber, T

AU - Passia, N

AU - Heydecke, Guido

AU - Reinhardt, W

AU - Hartmann, S

AU - Busche, E

AU - Mitov, G

AU - Stark, H

AU - Pospiech, P

AU - Weber, A

AU - Gernet, W

AU - Walter, M H

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The scientific evidence concerning prosthodontic care for the shortened dental arch (SDA) is sparse. This randomized multicenter study aimed to compare two common treatment options: removable partial dental prostheses (RPDPs) for molar replacement vs. no replacement (SDA). One of the hypotheses was that the follow-up treatment differs between patients with RPDPs and patients with SDAs during the 5-year follow-up period. Two hundred and fifteen patients with complete molar loss in one jaw were included in the study. Molars were either replaced by RPDPs or not replaced according to the SDA concept. A mean number of 4.2 (RPDP) and 2.8 (SDA) treatments for biological or technical reasons occurred during the 5-year observation time per patient. Concerning the biological aspect, no significant differences between the groups could be shown, whereas treatment arising from technical reasons was significantly more frequent for the RPDP group. When the severity of treatment was analyzed, a change over time was evident. When, at baseline, only follow-up treatment with minimal effort is required, over time there is a continuous increase to moderate and extensive effort observed for both groups (Controlled-trials.com number ISRCTN97265367).

AB - The scientific evidence concerning prosthodontic care for the shortened dental arch (SDA) is sparse. This randomized multicenter study aimed to compare two common treatment options: removable partial dental prostheses (RPDPs) for molar replacement vs. no replacement (SDA). One of the hypotheses was that the follow-up treatment differs between patients with RPDPs and patients with SDAs during the 5-year follow-up period. Two hundred and fifteen patients with complete molar loss in one jaw were included in the study. Molars were either replaced by RPDPs or not replaced according to the SDA concept. A mean number of 4.2 (RPDP) and 2.8 (SDA) treatments for biological or technical reasons occurred during the 5-year observation time per patient. Concerning the biological aspect, no significant differences between the groups could be shown, whereas treatment arising from technical reasons was significantly more frequent for the RPDP group. When the severity of treatment was analyzed, a change over time was evident. When, at baseline, only follow-up treatment with minimal effort is required, over time there is a continuous increase to moderate and extensive effort observed for both groups (Controlled-trials.com number ISRCTN97265367).

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Dental Abutments

KW - Bicuspid/pathology

KW - Dental Arch/pathology

KW - Denture Design

KW - Denture Precision Attachment

KW - Denture Retention

KW - Denture, Partial, Removable

KW - Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/rehabilitation

KW - Molar/pathology

KW - Tooth Loss/rehabilitation

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Dental Abutments

KW - Bicuspid/pathology

KW - Dental Arch/pathology

KW - Denture Design

KW - Denture Precision Attachment

KW - Denture Retention

KW - Denture, Partial, Removable

KW - Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/rehabilitation

KW - Molar/pathology

KW - Tooth Loss/rehabilitation

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 91

JO - J DENT RES

JF - J DENT RES

SN - 0022-0345

IS - 7 Suppl

M1 - 7 Suppl

ER -