The Portuguese DISABKIDS Asthma Module: a global index of asthma-specific quality of life for children and adolescents

Standard

The Portuguese DISABKIDS Asthma Module: a global index of asthma-specific quality of life for children and adolescents. / Silva, Neuza; Carona, Carlos; Crespo, Carla; Bullinger-Naber, Monika; Canavarro, Maria Cristina.

in: J ASTHMA, Jahrgang 51, Nr. 6, 08.2014, S. 645-651.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a2a33cee9da2421fadf76697d2e97b80,
title = "The Portuguese DISABKIDS Asthma Module: a global index of asthma-specific quality of life for children and adolescents",
abstract = "Abstract Background: The KIDSCREEN and DISABKIDS questionnaires constitute a modular system for assessing the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of children/adolescents. Objective: This study was aimed at examining the factorial structure of the Portuguese patient- and parent-reported versions of the DISABKIDS-Asthma Module (AsM) and its invariance across age groups and informants, as well as to examine their reliability and construct validity. Methods: The sample included 140 children/adolescents aged 8-18 years, who were diagnosed with asthma, and one of their parents. Both family members assessed HrQoL at the generic (KIDSCREEN-10), chronic-generic (DISABKIDS-12) and asthma-specific (DISABKIDS-AsM) levels. Asthma severity was classified by physicians using Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis attested the factorial validity of the correlated two-factor model of the DISABKIDS-AsM, but the low average variance extracted by each factor (Impact and Worry) suggested that a one-factor structure would better fit the Portuguese data. The one-factor model had an acceptable fit (χ(2)/df = 1.97; comparative fit index = 0.94; root mean square error of approximation = 0.08) and was invariant between age groups (children vs. adolescents) and informants (patient-reports vs. parent-reports). The resulting global index of asthma-specific HrQoL presented good reliability and convergent validity with the generic and chronic-generic measures. The DISABKIDS instruments also detected significant differences in HrQoL regarding asthma severity groups. Conclusions: The DISABKIDS-AsM may be regarded as a specific one-dimensional questionnaire, which, besides suiting pediatric patients in different developmental stages and enabling reliable proxy-reports, is sensitive to asthma clinical characteristics and is cross-culturally comparable, thus representing a valuable tool for assessing asthma-specific HrQoL as a primary health outcome in clinical practice and research contexts.",
author = "Neuza Silva and Carlos Carona and Carla Crespo and Monika Bullinger-Naber and Canavarro, {Maria Cristina}",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
doi = "10.3109/02770903.2014.885042",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "645--651",
journal = "J ASTHMA",
issn = "0277-0903",
publisher = "informa healthcare",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Portuguese DISABKIDS Asthma Module: a global index of asthma-specific quality of life for children and adolescents

AU - Silva, Neuza

AU - Carona, Carlos

AU - Crespo, Carla

AU - Bullinger-Naber, Monika

AU - Canavarro, Maria Cristina

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Abstract Background: The KIDSCREEN and DISABKIDS questionnaires constitute a modular system for assessing the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of children/adolescents. Objective: This study was aimed at examining the factorial structure of the Portuguese patient- and parent-reported versions of the DISABKIDS-Asthma Module (AsM) and its invariance across age groups and informants, as well as to examine their reliability and construct validity. Methods: The sample included 140 children/adolescents aged 8-18 years, who were diagnosed with asthma, and one of their parents. Both family members assessed HrQoL at the generic (KIDSCREEN-10), chronic-generic (DISABKIDS-12) and asthma-specific (DISABKIDS-AsM) levels. Asthma severity was classified by physicians using Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis attested the factorial validity of the correlated two-factor model of the DISABKIDS-AsM, but the low average variance extracted by each factor (Impact and Worry) suggested that a one-factor structure would better fit the Portuguese data. The one-factor model had an acceptable fit (χ(2)/df = 1.97; comparative fit index = 0.94; root mean square error of approximation = 0.08) and was invariant between age groups (children vs. adolescents) and informants (patient-reports vs. parent-reports). The resulting global index of asthma-specific HrQoL presented good reliability and convergent validity with the generic and chronic-generic measures. The DISABKIDS instruments also detected significant differences in HrQoL regarding asthma severity groups. Conclusions: The DISABKIDS-AsM may be regarded as a specific one-dimensional questionnaire, which, besides suiting pediatric patients in different developmental stages and enabling reliable proxy-reports, is sensitive to asthma clinical characteristics and is cross-culturally comparable, thus representing a valuable tool for assessing asthma-specific HrQoL as a primary health outcome in clinical practice and research contexts.

AB - Abstract Background: The KIDSCREEN and DISABKIDS questionnaires constitute a modular system for assessing the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of children/adolescents. Objective: This study was aimed at examining the factorial structure of the Portuguese patient- and parent-reported versions of the DISABKIDS-Asthma Module (AsM) and its invariance across age groups and informants, as well as to examine their reliability and construct validity. Methods: The sample included 140 children/adolescents aged 8-18 years, who were diagnosed with asthma, and one of their parents. Both family members assessed HrQoL at the generic (KIDSCREEN-10), chronic-generic (DISABKIDS-12) and asthma-specific (DISABKIDS-AsM) levels. Asthma severity was classified by physicians using Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis attested the factorial validity of the correlated two-factor model of the DISABKIDS-AsM, but the low average variance extracted by each factor (Impact and Worry) suggested that a one-factor structure would better fit the Portuguese data. The one-factor model had an acceptable fit (χ(2)/df = 1.97; comparative fit index = 0.94; root mean square error of approximation = 0.08) and was invariant between age groups (children vs. adolescents) and informants (patient-reports vs. parent-reports). The resulting global index of asthma-specific HrQoL presented good reliability and convergent validity with the generic and chronic-generic measures. The DISABKIDS instruments also detected significant differences in HrQoL regarding asthma severity groups. Conclusions: The DISABKIDS-AsM may be regarded as a specific one-dimensional questionnaire, which, besides suiting pediatric patients in different developmental stages and enabling reliable proxy-reports, is sensitive to asthma clinical characteristics and is cross-culturally comparable, thus representing a valuable tool for assessing asthma-specific HrQoL as a primary health outcome in clinical practice and research contexts.

U2 - 10.3109/02770903.2014.885042

DO - 10.3109/02770903.2014.885042

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24447285

VL - 51

SP - 645

EP - 651

JO - J ASTHMA

JF - J ASTHMA

SN - 0277-0903

IS - 6

ER -