The duration of chemoprophylaxis against malaria after treatment with artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine and the effects of pfmdr1 86Y and pfcrt 76T: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
Standard
The duration of chemoprophylaxis against malaria after treatment with artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine and the effects of pfmdr1 86Y and pfcrt 76T: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. / Bretscher, Michael T; Dahal, Prabin; Griffin, Jamie; Stepniewska, Kasia; Bassat, Quique; Baudin, Elisabeth; D'Alessandro, Umberto; Djimde, Abdoulaye A; Dorsey, Grant; Espié, Emmanuelle; Fofana, Bakary; González, Raquel; Juma, Elizabeth; Karema, Corine; Lasry, Estrella; Lell, Bertrand; Lima, Nines; Menéndez, Clara; Mombo-Ngoma, Ghyslain; Moreira, Clarissa; Nikiema, Frederic; Ouédraogo, Jean B; Staedke, Sarah G; Tinto, Halidou; Valea, Innocent; Yeka, Adoke; Ghani, Azra C; UK, Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford; Okell, Lucy C.
in: BMC MED, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 1, 25.02.2020, S. 47.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The duration of chemoprophylaxis against malaria after treatment with artesunate-amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine and the effects of pfmdr1 86Y and pfcrt 76T: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
AU - Bretscher, Michael T
AU - Dahal, Prabin
AU - Griffin, Jamie
AU - Stepniewska, Kasia
AU - Bassat, Quique
AU - Baudin, Elisabeth
AU - D'Alessandro, Umberto
AU - Djimde, Abdoulaye A
AU - Dorsey, Grant
AU - Espié, Emmanuelle
AU - Fofana, Bakary
AU - González, Raquel
AU - Juma, Elizabeth
AU - Karema, Corine
AU - Lasry, Estrella
AU - Lell, Bertrand
AU - Lima, Nines
AU - Menéndez, Clara
AU - Mombo-Ngoma, Ghyslain
AU - Moreira, Clarissa
AU - Nikiema, Frederic
AU - Ouédraogo, Jean B
AU - Staedke, Sarah G
AU - Tinto, Halidou
AU - Valea, Innocent
AU - Yeka, Adoke
AU - Ghani, Azra C
AU - UK, Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford
AU - Okell, Lucy C
PY - 2020/2/25
Y1 - 2020/2/25
N2 - BACKGROUND: The majority of Plasmodium falciparum malaria cases in Africa are treated with the artemisinin combination therapies artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ), with amodiaquine being also widely used as part of seasonal malaria chemoprevention programs combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. While artemisinin derivatives have a short half-life, lumefantrine and amodiaquine may give rise to differing durations of post-treatment prophylaxis, an important additional benefit to patients in higher transmission areas.METHODS: We analyzed individual patient data from 8 clinical trials of AL versus AS-AQ in 12 sites in Africa (n = 4214 individuals). The time to PCR-confirmed reinfection after treatment was used to estimate the duration of post-treatment protection, accounting for variation in transmission intensity between settings using hidden semi-Markov models. Accelerated failure-time models were used to identify potential effects of covariates on the time to reinfection. The estimated duration of chemoprophylaxis was then used in a mathematical model of malaria transmission to determine the potential public health impact of each drug when used for first-line treatment.RESULTS: We estimated a mean duration of post-treatment protection of 13.0 days (95% CI 10.7-15.7) for AL and 15.2 days (95% CI 12.8-18.4) for AS-AQ overall. However, the duration varied significantly between trial sites, from 8.7-18.6 days for AL and 10.2-18.7 days for AS-AQ. Significant predictors of time to reinfection in multivariable models were transmission intensity, age, drug, and parasite genotype. Where wild type pfmdr1 and pfcrt parasite genotypes predominated (<=20% 86Y and 76T mutants, respectively), AS-AQ provided ~ 2-fold longer protection than AL. Conversely, at a higher prevalence of 86Y and 76T mutant parasites (> 80%), AL provided up to 1.5-fold longer protection than AS-AQ. Our simulations found that these differences in the duration of protection could alter population-level clinical incidence of malaria by up to 14% in under-5-year-old children when the drugs were used as first-line treatments in areas with high, seasonal transmission.CONCLUSION: Choosing a first-line treatment which provides optimal post-treatment prophylaxis given the local prevalence of resistance-associated markers could make a significant contribution to reducing malaria morbidity.
AB - BACKGROUND: The majority of Plasmodium falciparum malaria cases in Africa are treated with the artemisinin combination therapies artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ), with amodiaquine being also widely used as part of seasonal malaria chemoprevention programs combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. While artemisinin derivatives have a short half-life, lumefantrine and amodiaquine may give rise to differing durations of post-treatment prophylaxis, an important additional benefit to patients in higher transmission areas.METHODS: We analyzed individual patient data from 8 clinical trials of AL versus AS-AQ in 12 sites in Africa (n = 4214 individuals). The time to PCR-confirmed reinfection after treatment was used to estimate the duration of post-treatment protection, accounting for variation in transmission intensity between settings using hidden semi-Markov models. Accelerated failure-time models were used to identify potential effects of covariates on the time to reinfection. The estimated duration of chemoprophylaxis was then used in a mathematical model of malaria transmission to determine the potential public health impact of each drug when used for first-line treatment.RESULTS: We estimated a mean duration of post-treatment protection of 13.0 days (95% CI 10.7-15.7) for AL and 15.2 days (95% CI 12.8-18.4) for AS-AQ overall. However, the duration varied significantly between trial sites, from 8.7-18.6 days for AL and 10.2-18.7 days for AS-AQ. Significant predictors of time to reinfection in multivariable models were transmission intensity, age, drug, and parasite genotype. Where wild type pfmdr1 and pfcrt parasite genotypes predominated (<=20% 86Y and 76T mutants, respectively), AS-AQ provided ~ 2-fold longer protection than AL. Conversely, at a higher prevalence of 86Y and 76T mutant parasites (> 80%), AL provided up to 1.5-fold longer protection than AS-AQ. Our simulations found that these differences in the duration of protection could alter population-level clinical incidence of malaria by up to 14% in under-5-year-old children when the drugs were used as first-line treatments in areas with high, seasonal transmission.CONCLUSION: Choosing a first-line treatment which provides optimal post-treatment prophylaxis given the local prevalence of resistance-associated markers could make a significant contribution to reducing malaria morbidity.
KW - Amodiaquine/pharmacology
KW - Antimalarials/pharmacology
KW - Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination/pharmacology
KW - Artemisinins/pharmacology
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Drug Combinations
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Infant
KW - Malaria, Falciparum/drug therapy
KW - Male
KW - Plasmodium falciparum/pathogenicity
U2 - 10.1186/s12916-020-1494-3
DO - 10.1186/s12916-020-1494-3
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 32098634
VL - 18
SP - 47
JO - BMC MED
JF - BMC MED
SN - 1741-7015
IS - 1
ER -