‘That decision really was mine…’. Insider perspectives on health care controversies about intersex/diverse sex development

Standard

‘That decision really was mine…’. Insider perspectives on health care controversies about intersex/diverse sex development. / Lampalzer, Ute; Briken, Peer; Schweizer, Katinka.

in: CULT HEALTH SEX, Jahrgang 23, Nr. 4, 23.03.2021, S. 472-483.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{55c46c7336d5465d8a4c0ff649fa0653,
title = "{\textquoteleft}That decision really was mine…{\textquoteright}. Insider perspectives on health care controversies about intersex/diverse sex development",
abstract = "After 20 years of debate on intersex care, there has been a slight movement away from the paradigm of {\textquoteleft}optimal gender{\textquoteright} including early genital modification to conform to predicted gender identity towards a paradigm of {\textquoteleft}full consent{\textquoteright} including the provision of full information about the risks, benefits and alternatives to interventions and the postponement of irreversible interventions on minors too young to give informed consent. However, controversy continues. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse core aspects of current debates in intersex care. Focus was placed on controversies about surgery on external genitalia; gonadectomies; the expressed wishes of patients under the age of consent; and how to deal with intersex within the family. Eight guideline-based interviews were conducted with two people with intersex/diverse sex development conditions who had been subjected to surgery, two parents of children with an intersex/dsd condition, two medical doctors, and two psychologists. Data were analysed thematically. Findings indicate that while {\textquoteleft}full consent{\textquoteright} influenced actions and debate, the persons involved held differing opinions about how this policy can or should be achieved. In addition, the data illustrated how concepts such as normalcy, identity and sexuality are relevant when dealing with intersex issues.",
author = "Ute Lampalzer and Peer Briken and Katinka Schweizer",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/13691058.2021.1892828",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "472--483",
journal = "CULT HEALTH SEX",
issn = "1369-1058",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘That decision really was mine…’. Insider perspectives on health care controversies about intersex/diverse sex development

AU - Lampalzer, Ute

AU - Briken, Peer

AU - Schweizer, Katinka

PY - 2021/3/23

Y1 - 2021/3/23

N2 - After 20 years of debate on intersex care, there has been a slight movement away from the paradigm of ‘optimal gender’ including early genital modification to conform to predicted gender identity towards a paradigm of ‘full consent’ including the provision of full information about the risks, benefits and alternatives to interventions and the postponement of irreversible interventions on minors too young to give informed consent. However, controversy continues. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse core aspects of current debates in intersex care. Focus was placed on controversies about surgery on external genitalia; gonadectomies; the expressed wishes of patients under the age of consent; and how to deal with intersex within the family. Eight guideline-based interviews were conducted with two people with intersex/diverse sex development conditions who had been subjected to surgery, two parents of children with an intersex/dsd condition, two medical doctors, and two psychologists. Data were analysed thematically. Findings indicate that while ‘full consent’ influenced actions and debate, the persons involved held differing opinions about how this policy can or should be achieved. In addition, the data illustrated how concepts such as normalcy, identity and sexuality are relevant when dealing with intersex issues.

AB - After 20 years of debate on intersex care, there has been a slight movement away from the paradigm of ‘optimal gender’ including early genital modification to conform to predicted gender identity towards a paradigm of ‘full consent’ including the provision of full information about the risks, benefits and alternatives to interventions and the postponement of irreversible interventions on minors too young to give informed consent. However, controversy continues. Against this background, the aim of this study was to analyse core aspects of current debates in intersex care. Focus was placed on controversies about surgery on external genitalia; gonadectomies; the expressed wishes of patients under the age of consent; and how to deal with intersex within the family. Eight guideline-based interviews were conducted with two people with intersex/diverse sex development conditions who had been subjected to surgery, two parents of children with an intersex/dsd condition, two medical doctors, and two psychologists. Data were analysed thematically. Findings indicate that while ‘full consent’ influenced actions and debate, the persons involved held differing opinions about how this policy can or should be achieved. In addition, the data illustrated how concepts such as normalcy, identity and sexuality are relevant when dealing with intersex issues.

U2 - 10.1080/13691058.2021.1892828

DO - 10.1080/13691058.2021.1892828

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 472

EP - 483

JO - CULT HEALTH SEX

JF - CULT HEALTH SEX

SN - 1369-1058

IS - 4

ER -