PortalPublikationenSystolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation dur...

Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure.

Standard

Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. / Kubitz, Jens; Forkl, Stefanie; Annecke, Thorsten; Kronas, Nils; Goetz, Alwin E.; Reuter, Daniel A.

in: INTENS CARE MED, Jahrgang 34, Nr. 8, 8, 2008, S. 1520-1524.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Kubitz, J, Forkl, S, Annecke, T, Kronas, N, Goetz, AE & Reuter, DA 2008, 'Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure.', INTENS CARE MED, Jg. 34, Nr. 8, 8, S. 1520-1524. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18427779?dopt=Citation>

APA

Kubitz, J., Forkl, S., Annecke, T., Kronas, N., Goetz, A. E., & Reuter, D. A. (2008). Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. INTENS CARE MED, 34(8), 1520-1524. [8]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18427779?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Kubitz J, Forkl S, Annecke T, Kronas N, Goetz AE, Reuter DA. Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. INTENS CARE MED. 2008;34(8):1520-1524. 8.

Bibtex

@article{32cbfcb1c7e848d488635c323e1a6a85,
title = "Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate the effect of vasopressor therapy on systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to experimentally measured left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in a university laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Increase in mean arterial pressure (by 100%) using phenylephrine and decrease (by 38%) using adenosine. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: SPV and PPV were calculated and compared to SVV derived from aortic blood flow measurements. SPV was significantly affected by changes in arterial pressure [4.6% (1.5) vs. 6.3% (2.1), p <0.05, increased vs. decreased arterial pressure], whereas PPV did not change during modifications of arterial pressure. During baseline conditions and decreased afterload, correlation with SVV was good both for SPV (r =0.892 and r = 0.859, respectively) and for PPV (r = 0.870 and r = 0.871, respectively) (all p <0.001). Correlation with SVV was only moderate during increased arterial pressure (r = 0.683 for SPV and r = 0.732 for PPV, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: For guiding fluid therapy in patients under vasopressor support, PPV seems superior to SPV.",
author = "Jens Kubitz and Stefanie Forkl and Thorsten Annecke and Nils Kronas and Goetz, {Alwin E.} and Reuter, {Daniel A}",
year = "2008",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "34",
pages = "1520--1524",
journal = "INTENS CARE MED",
issn = "0342-4642",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure.

AU - Kubitz, Jens

AU - Forkl, Stefanie

AU - Annecke, Thorsten

AU - Kronas, Nils

AU - Goetz, Alwin E.

AU - Reuter, Daniel A

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate the effect of vasopressor therapy on systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to experimentally measured left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in a university laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Increase in mean arterial pressure (by 100%) using phenylephrine and decrease (by 38%) using adenosine. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: SPV and PPV were calculated and compared to SVV derived from aortic blood flow measurements. SPV was significantly affected by changes in arterial pressure [4.6% (1.5) vs. 6.3% (2.1), p <0.05, increased vs. decreased arterial pressure], whereas PPV did not change during modifications of arterial pressure. During baseline conditions and decreased afterload, correlation with SVV was good both for SPV (r =0.892 and r = 0.859, respectively) and for PPV (r = 0.870 and r = 0.871, respectively) (all p <0.001). Correlation with SVV was only moderate during increased arterial pressure (r = 0.683 for SPV and r = 0.732 for PPV, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: For guiding fluid therapy in patients under vasopressor support, PPV seems superior to SPV.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to investigate the effect of vasopressor therapy on systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to experimentally measured left ventricular stroke volume variation (SVV). DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in a university laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Increase in mean arterial pressure (by 100%) using phenylephrine and decrease (by 38%) using adenosine. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: SPV and PPV were calculated and compared to SVV derived from aortic blood flow measurements. SPV was significantly affected by changes in arterial pressure [4.6% (1.5) vs. 6.3% (2.1), p <0.05, increased vs. decreased arterial pressure], whereas PPV did not change during modifications of arterial pressure. During baseline conditions and decreased afterload, correlation with SVV was good both for SPV (r =0.892 and r = 0.859, respectively) and for PPV (r = 0.870 and r = 0.871, respectively) (all p <0.001). Correlation with SVV was only moderate during increased arterial pressure (r = 0.683 for SPV and r = 0.732 for PPV, p <0.05). CONCLUSION: For guiding fluid therapy in patients under vasopressor support, PPV seems superior to SPV.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 34

SP - 1520

EP - 1524

JO - INTENS CARE MED

JF - INTENS CARE MED

SN - 0342-4642

IS - 8

M1 - 8

ER -