Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy

Standard

Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy. / Willemse, Peter-Paul M; Davis, Niall F; Grivas, Nikolaos; Zattoni, Fabio; Lardas, Michael; Briers, Erik; Cumberbatch, Marcus G; De Santis, Maria; Dell'Oglio, Paolo; Donaldson, James F; Fossati, Nicola; Gandaglia, Giorgio; Gillessen, Silke; Grummet, Jeremy P; Henry, Ann M; Liew, Matthew; MacLennan, Steven; Mason, Malcolm D; Moris, Lisa; Plass, Karin; O'Hanlon, Shane; Omar, Muhammad Imran; Oprea-Lager, Daniela E; Pang, Karl H; Paterson, Catherine C; Ploussard, Guillaume; Rouvière, Olivier; Schoots, Ivo G; Tilki, Derya; van den Bergh, Roderick C N; Van den Broeck, Thomas; van der Kwast, Theodorus H; van der Poel, Henk G; Wiegel, Thomas; Yuan, Cathy Yuhong; Cornford, Philip; Mottet, Nicolas; Lam, Thomas B L.

in: EUR UROL, Jahrgang 81, Nr. 4, 04.2022, S. 337-346.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

Willemse, P-PM, Davis, NF, Grivas, N, Zattoni, F, Lardas, M, Briers, E, Cumberbatch, MG, De Santis, M, Dell'Oglio, P, Donaldson, JF, Fossati, N, Gandaglia, G, Gillessen, S, Grummet, JP, Henry, AM, Liew, M, MacLennan, S, Mason, MD, Moris, L, Plass, K, O'Hanlon, S, Omar, MI, Oprea-Lager, DE, Pang, KH, Paterson, CC, Ploussard, G, Rouvière, O, Schoots, IG, Tilki, D, van den Bergh, RCN, Van den Broeck, T, van der Kwast, TH, van der Poel, HG, Wiegel, T, Yuan, CY, Cornford, P, Mottet, N & Lam, TBL 2022, 'Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy', EUR UROL, Jg. 81, Nr. 4, S. 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.007

APA

Willemse, P-P. M., Davis, N. F., Grivas, N., Zattoni, F., Lardas, M., Briers, E., Cumberbatch, M. G., De Santis, M., Dell'Oglio, P., Donaldson, J. F., Fossati, N., Gandaglia, G., Gillessen, S., Grummet, J. P., Henry, A. M., Liew, M., MacLennan, S., Mason, M. D., Moris, L., ... Lam, T. B. L. (2022). Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy. EUR UROL, 81(4), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.007

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{479e4f17d3534213a655c160088e1d56,
title = "Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy",
abstract = "CONTEXT: There is uncertainty regarding the most appropriate criteria for recruitment, monitoring, and reclassification in active surveillance (AS) protocols for localised prostate cancer (PCa).OBJECTIVE: To perform a qualitative systematic review (SR) to issue recommendations regarding inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, biopsy characteristics at inclusion and monitoring, and repeat biopsy strategy.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A protocol-driven, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-adhering SR incorporating AS protocols published from January 1990 to October 2020 was performed. The main outcomes were criteria for inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, monitoring, reclassification, and repeat biopsy strategies (per protocol and/or triggered). Clinical effectiveness data were not assessed.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 17 011 articles identified, 333 studies incorporating 375 AS protocols, recruiting 264 852 patients, were included. Only a minority of protocols included the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for recruitment (n = 17), follow-up (n = 47), and reclassification (n = 26). More than 50% of protocols included patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, whilst 44.1% of protocols excluded low-risk patients with more than three positive cores, and 39% of protocols excluded patients with core involvement (CI) >50% per core. Of the protocols, ≥80% mandated a confirmatory transrectal ultrasound biopsy; 72% (n = 189) of protocols mandated per-protocol repeat biopsies, with 20% performing this annually and 25% every 2 yr. Only 27 protocols (10.3%) mandated triggered biopsies, with 74% of these protocols defining progression or changes on MRI as triggers for repeat biopsy.CONCLUSIONS: For AS protocols in which the use of MRI is not mandatory or absent, we recommend the following: (1) AS can be considered in patients with low-volume International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 (three or fewer positive cores and cancer involvement ≤50% CI per core) or another single element of intermediate-risk disease, and patients with ISUP 3 should be excluded; (2) per-protocol confirmatory prostate biopsies should be performed within 2 yr, and per-protocol surveillance repeat biopsies should be performed at least once every 3 yr for the first 10 yr; and (3) for patients with low-volume, low-risk disease at recruitment, if repeat systematic biopsies reveal more than three positive cores or maximum CI >50% per core, they should be monitored closely for evidence of adverse features (eg, upgrading); patients with ISUP 2 disease with increased core positivity and/or CI to similar thresholds should be reclassified.PATIENT SUMMARY: We examined the literature to issue new recommendations on active surveillance (AS) for managing localised prostate cancer. The recommendations include setting criteria for including men with more aggressive disease (intermediate-risk disease), setting thresholds for close monitoring of men with low-risk but more extensive disease, and determining when to perform repeat biopsies (within 2 yr and 3 yearly thereafter).",
keywords = "Biopsy/methods, Humans, Image-Guided Biopsy/methods, Male, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostate/pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology, Watchful Waiting/methods",
author = "Willemse, {Peter-Paul M} and Davis, {Niall F} and Nikolaos Grivas and Fabio Zattoni and Michael Lardas and Erik Briers and Cumberbatch, {Marcus G} and {De Santis}, Maria and Paolo Dell'Oglio and Donaldson, {James F} and Nicola Fossati and Giorgio Gandaglia and Silke Gillessen and Grummet, {Jeremy P} and Henry, {Ann M} and Matthew Liew and Steven MacLennan and Mason, {Malcolm D} and Lisa Moris and Karin Plass and Shane O'Hanlon and Omar, {Muhammad Imran} and Oprea-Lager, {Daniela E} and Pang, {Karl H} and Paterson, {Catherine C} and Guillaume Ploussard and Olivier Rouvi{\`e}re and Schoots, {Ivo G} and Derya Tilki and {van den Bergh}, {Roderick C N} and {Van den Broeck}, Thomas and {van der Kwast}, {Theodorus H} and {van der Poel}, {Henk G} and Thomas Wiegel and Yuan, {Cathy Yuhong} and Philip Cornford and Nicolas Mottet and Lam, {Thomas B L}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "337--346",
journal = "EUR UROL",
issn = "0302-2838",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy

AU - Willemse, Peter-Paul M

AU - Davis, Niall F

AU - Grivas, Nikolaos

AU - Zattoni, Fabio

AU - Lardas, Michael

AU - Briers, Erik

AU - Cumberbatch, Marcus G

AU - De Santis, Maria

AU - Dell'Oglio, Paolo

AU - Donaldson, James F

AU - Fossati, Nicola

AU - Gandaglia, Giorgio

AU - Gillessen, Silke

AU - Grummet, Jeremy P

AU - Henry, Ann M

AU - Liew, Matthew

AU - MacLennan, Steven

AU - Mason, Malcolm D

AU - Moris, Lisa

AU - Plass, Karin

AU - O'Hanlon, Shane

AU - Omar, Muhammad Imran

AU - Oprea-Lager, Daniela E

AU - Pang, Karl H

AU - Paterson, Catherine C

AU - Ploussard, Guillaume

AU - Rouvière, Olivier

AU - Schoots, Ivo G

AU - Tilki, Derya

AU - van den Bergh, Roderick C N

AU - Van den Broeck, Thomas

AU - van der Kwast, Theodorus H

AU - van der Poel, Henk G

AU - Wiegel, Thomas

AU - Yuan, Cathy Yuhong

AU - Cornford, Philip

AU - Mottet, Nicolas

AU - Lam, Thomas B L

N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/4

Y1 - 2022/4

N2 - CONTEXT: There is uncertainty regarding the most appropriate criteria for recruitment, monitoring, and reclassification in active surveillance (AS) protocols for localised prostate cancer (PCa).OBJECTIVE: To perform a qualitative systematic review (SR) to issue recommendations regarding inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, biopsy characteristics at inclusion and monitoring, and repeat biopsy strategy.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A protocol-driven, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-adhering SR incorporating AS protocols published from January 1990 to October 2020 was performed. The main outcomes were criteria for inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, monitoring, reclassification, and repeat biopsy strategies (per protocol and/or triggered). Clinical effectiveness data were not assessed.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 17 011 articles identified, 333 studies incorporating 375 AS protocols, recruiting 264 852 patients, were included. Only a minority of protocols included the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for recruitment (n = 17), follow-up (n = 47), and reclassification (n = 26). More than 50% of protocols included patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, whilst 44.1% of protocols excluded low-risk patients with more than three positive cores, and 39% of protocols excluded patients with core involvement (CI) >50% per core. Of the protocols, ≥80% mandated a confirmatory transrectal ultrasound biopsy; 72% (n = 189) of protocols mandated per-protocol repeat biopsies, with 20% performing this annually and 25% every 2 yr. Only 27 protocols (10.3%) mandated triggered biopsies, with 74% of these protocols defining progression or changes on MRI as triggers for repeat biopsy.CONCLUSIONS: For AS protocols in which the use of MRI is not mandatory or absent, we recommend the following: (1) AS can be considered in patients with low-volume International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 (three or fewer positive cores and cancer involvement ≤50% CI per core) or another single element of intermediate-risk disease, and patients with ISUP 3 should be excluded; (2) per-protocol confirmatory prostate biopsies should be performed within 2 yr, and per-protocol surveillance repeat biopsies should be performed at least once every 3 yr for the first 10 yr; and (3) for patients with low-volume, low-risk disease at recruitment, if repeat systematic biopsies reveal more than three positive cores or maximum CI >50% per core, they should be monitored closely for evidence of adverse features (eg, upgrading); patients with ISUP 2 disease with increased core positivity and/or CI to similar thresholds should be reclassified.PATIENT SUMMARY: We examined the literature to issue new recommendations on active surveillance (AS) for managing localised prostate cancer. The recommendations include setting criteria for including men with more aggressive disease (intermediate-risk disease), setting thresholds for close monitoring of men with low-risk but more extensive disease, and determining when to perform repeat biopsies (within 2 yr and 3 yearly thereafter).

AB - CONTEXT: There is uncertainty regarding the most appropriate criteria for recruitment, monitoring, and reclassification in active surveillance (AS) protocols for localised prostate cancer (PCa).OBJECTIVE: To perform a qualitative systematic review (SR) to issue recommendations regarding inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, biopsy characteristics at inclusion and monitoring, and repeat biopsy strategy.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A protocol-driven, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-adhering SR incorporating AS protocols published from January 1990 to October 2020 was performed. The main outcomes were criteria for inclusion of intermediate-risk disease, monitoring, reclassification, and repeat biopsy strategies (per protocol and/or triggered). Clinical effectiveness data were not assessed.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 17 011 articles identified, 333 studies incorporating 375 AS protocols, recruiting 264 852 patients, were included. Only a minority of protocols included the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for recruitment (n = 17), follow-up (n = 47), and reclassification (n = 26). More than 50% of protocols included patients with intermediate or high-risk disease, whilst 44.1% of protocols excluded low-risk patients with more than three positive cores, and 39% of protocols excluded patients with core involvement (CI) >50% per core. Of the protocols, ≥80% mandated a confirmatory transrectal ultrasound biopsy; 72% (n = 189) of protocols mandated per-protocol repeat biopsies, with 20% performing this annually and 25% every 2 yr. Only 27 protocols (10.3%) mandated triggered biopsies, with 74% of these protocols defining progression or changes on MRI as triggers for repeat biopsy.CONCLUSIONS: For AS protocols in which the use of MRI is not mandatory or absent, we recommend the following: (1) AS can be considered in patients with low-volume International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 (three or fewer positive cores and cancer involvement ≤50% CI per core) or another single element of intermediate-risk disease, and patients with ISUP 3 should be excluded; (2) per-protocol confirmatory prostate biopsies should be performed within 2 yr, and per-protocol surveillance repeat biopsies should be performed at least once every 3 yr for the first 10 yr; and (3) for patients with low-volume, low-risk disease at recruitment, if repeat systematic biopsies reveal more than three positive cores or maximum CI >50% per core, they should be monitored closely for evidence of adverse features (eg, upgrading); patients with ISUP 2 disease with increased core positivity and/or CI to similar thresholds should be reclassified.PATIENT SUMMARY: We examined the literature to issue new recommendations on active surveillance (AS) for managing localised prostate cancer. The recommendations include setting criteria for including men with more aggressive disease (intermediate-risk disease), setting thresholds for close monitoring of men with low-risk but more extensive disease, and determining when to perform repeat biopsies (within 2 yr and 3 yearly thereafter).

KW - Biopsy/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Image-Guided Biopsy/methods

KW - Male

KW - Prostate-Specific Antigen

KW - Prostate/pathology

KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology

KW - Watchful Waiting/methods

U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.007

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 34980492

VL - 81

SP - 337

EP - 346

JO - EUR UROL

JF - EUR UROL

SN - 0302-2838

IS - 4

ER -