Standarddatensatz für die Evaluation bei Selektivverträgen bei Ulcus cruris

Standard

Standarddatensatz für die Evaluation bei Selektivverträgen bei Ulcus cruris. / Heyer, K; Milde, S; Schmitt, J; May, M; Helfrich, J; Augustin, M; Konsensusgruppe.

in: HAUTARZT, Jahrgang 68, Nr. 10, 10.2017, S. 815-826.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Heyer, K, Milde, S, Schmitt, J, May, M, Helfrich, J, Augustin, M & Konsensusgruppe 2017, 'Standarddatensatz für die Evaluation bei Selektivverträgen bei Ulcus cruris', HAUTARZT, Jg. 68, Nr. 10, S. 815-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-017-3990-8

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{2718d9301e754df3b0d6d8431ae876b2,
title = "Standarddatensatz f{\"u}r die Evaluation bei Selektivvertr{\"a}gen bei Ulcus cruris",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Selective agreements are becoming increasingly important in health care management. To date, no standard recommendations for the evaluation of selective contracts are available.OBJECTIVES: Against this background, a recommendation on the evaluation of selective contracts in patients with leg ulcers (LU) was developed and approved by the nationwide consensus conference.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a systematic literature review and followed by a manual search through other possible evaluation indicators in the care of patients with LU, a Delphi-based consensus process was performed by various scientific societies, professional associations, insurances and supply networks.RESULTS: For the evaluation of efficiency and quality of care, a recommendation on the evaluation of selective agreements with patients with LU was consented in six meetings and in five multistage online surveys. In total, 44 evaluation indicators were identified in the quality subareas structure, process, and outcome. The outcome indicators are divided into clinical, patient-related, and cost-related indicators.CONCLUSIONS: The developed evaluation indicators represent the quality of care in patients with LU. The indicators can be applied individually, depending on the agreed contract-specific supply target. After implementation of this national standard, the comparability of selective agreements in the management of patients with LU can be ensured and consolidated.",
keywords = "English Abstract, Journal Article",
author = "K Heyer and S Milde and J Schmitt and M May and J Helfrich and M Augustin and Konsensusgruppe",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s00105-017-3990-8",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "68",
pages = "815--826",
journal = "HAUTARZT",
issn = "0017-8470",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standarddatensatz für die Evaluation bei Selektivverträgen bei Ulcus cruris

AU - Heyer, K

AU - Milde, S

AU - Schmitt, J

AU - May, M

AU - Helfrich, J

AU - Augustin, M

AU - Konsensusgruppe

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - BACKGROUND: Selective agreements are becoming increasingly important in health care management. To date, no standard recommendations for the evaluation of selective contracts are available.OBJECTIVES: Against this background, a recommendation on the evaluation of selective contracts in patients with leg ulcers (LU) was developed and approved by the nationwide consensus conference.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a systematic literature review and followed by a manual search through other possible evaluation indicators in the care of patients with LU, a Delphi-based consensus process was performed by various scientific societies, professional associations, insurances and supply networks.RESULTS: For the evaluation of efficiency and quality of care, a recommendation on the evaluation of selective agreements with patients with LU was consented in six meetings and in five multistage online surveys. In total, 44 evaluation indicators were identified in the quality subareas structure, process, and outcome. The outcome indicators are divided into clinical, patient-related, and cost-related indicators.CONCLUSIONS: The developed evaluation indicators represent the quality of care in patients with LU. The indicators can be applied individually, depending on the agreed contract-specific supply target. After implementation of this national standard, the comparability of selective agreements in the management of patients with LU can be ensured and consolidated.

AB - BACKGROUND: Selective agreements are becoming increasingly important in health care management. To date, no standard recommendations for the evaluation of selective contracts are available.OBJECTIVES: Against this background, a recommendation on the evaluation of selective contracts in patients with leg ulcers (LU) was developed and approved by the nationwide consensus conference.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a systematic literature review and followed by a manual search through other possible evaluation indicators in the care of patients with LU, a Delphi-based consensus process was performed by various scientific societies, professional associations, insurances and supply networks.RESULTS: For the evaluation of efficiency and quality of care, a recommendation on the evaluation of selective agreements with patients with LU was consented in six meetings and in five multistage online surveys. In total, 44 evaluation indicators were identified in the quality subareas structure, process, and outcome. The outcome indicators are divided into clinical, patient-related, and cost-related indicators.CONCLUSIONS: The developed evaluation indicators represent the quality of care in patients with LU. The indicators can be applied individually, depending on the agreed contract-specific supply target. After implementation of this national standard, the comparability of selective agreements in the management of patients with LU can be ensured and consolidated.

KW - English Abstract

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00105-017-3990-8

DO - 10.1007/s00105-017-3990-8

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 28567507

VL - 68

SP - 815

EP - 826

JO - HAUTARZT

JF - HAUTARZT

SN - 0017-8470

IS - 10

ER -