Simulation-based training improves process times in acute stroke care (STREAM)

  • Ferdinand O Bohmann
  • Katharina Gruber
  • Natalia Kurka
  • Laurent M Willems
  • Eva Herrmann
  • Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont
  • Peter Scholz
  • Heike Rai
  • Philipp Zickler
  • Michael Ertl
  • Ansgar Berlis
  • Sven Poli
  • Annerose Mengel
  • Peter Ringleb
  • Simon Nagel
  • Johannes Pfaff
  • Frank A Wollenweber
  • Lars Kellert
  • Moriz Herzberg
  • Luzie Koehler
  • Karl Georg Haeusler
  • Anna Alegiani
  • Charlotte Schubert
  • Caspar Brekenfeld
  • Christopher E J Doppler
  • Özgür A Onur
  • Christoph Kabbasch
  • Tanja Manser
  • Helmuth Steinmetz
  • Waltraud Pfeilschifter
  • STREAM Trial Investigators

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of the STREAM Trial was to evaluate the effect of simulation training on process times in acute stroke care.

METHODS: The multicenter prospective interventional STREAM Trial was conducted between 10/2017 and 04/2019 at seven tertiary care neurocenters in Germany with a pre- and post-interventional observation phase. We recorded patient characteristics, acute stroke care process times, stroke team composition and simulation experience for consecutive direct-to-center patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT). The intervention consisted of a composite intervention centered around stroke-specific in situ simulation training. Primary outcome measure was the 'door-to-needle' time (DTN) for IVT. Secondary outcome measures included process times of EVT and measures taken to streamline the pre-existing treatment algorithm.

RESULTS: The effect of the STREAM intervention on the process times of all acute stroke operations was neutral. However, secondary analyses showed a DTN reduction of 5 min from 38 min pre-intervention (interquartile range [IQR] 25-43 min) to 33 min (IQR 23-39 min, p = 0.03) post-intervention achieved by simulation-experienced stroke teams. Concerning EVT, we found significantly shorter door-to-groin times in patients who were treated by teams with simulation experience as compared to simulation-naive teams in the post-interventional phase (-21 min, simulation-naive: 95 min, IQR 69-111 vs. simulation-experienced: 74 min, IQR 51-92, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: An intervention combining workflow refinement and simulation-based stroke team training has the potential to improve process times in acute stroke care.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN1351-5101
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 01.2022

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.

PubMed 34478596