Serial enumeration of circulating tumor cells predicts treatment response andprognosis in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study in 393 patients

Standard

Serial enumeration of circulating tumor cells predicts treatment response andprognosis in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study in 393 patients. / Wallwiener, Markus; Riethdorf, Sabine; Hartkopf, Andreas Daniel; Modugno, Caroline; Nees, Juliane; Madhavan, Dharanija; Sprick, Martin Ronald; Schott, Sarah; Domschke, Christoph; Baccelli, Irène; Schönfisch, Birgitt; Burwinkel, Barbara; Marmé, Frederik; Heil, Jörg; Sohn, Christof; Pantel, Klaus; Trumpp, Andreas; Schneeweiss, Andreas.

in: BMC CANCER, Jahrgang 14, 11.07.2014, S. 512.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Wallwiener, M, Riethdorf, S, Hartkopf, AD, Modugno, C, Nees, J, Madhavan, D, Sprick, MR, Schott, S, Domschke, C, Baccelli, I, Schönfisch, B, Burwinkel, B, Marmé, F, Heil, J, Sohn, C, Pantel, K, Trumpp, A & Schneeweiss, A 2014, 'Serial enumeration of circulating tumor cells predicts treatment response andprognosis in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study in 393 patients', BMC CANCER, Jg. 14, S. 512. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-512

APA

Wallwiener, M., Riethdorf, S., Hartkopf, A. D., Modugno, C., Nees, J., Madhavan, D., Sprick, M. R., Schott, S., Domschke, C., Baccelli, I., Schönfisch, B., Burwinkel, B., Marmé, F., Heil, J., Sohn, C., Pantel, K., Trumpp, A., & Schneeweiss, A. (2014). Serial enumeration of circulating tumor cells predicts treatment response andprognosis in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study in 393 patients. BMC CANCER, 14, 512. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-512

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9f09529318054b5ab9d7e7fc690921ba,
title = "Serial enumeration of circulating tumor cells predicts treatment response andprognosis in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study in 393 patients",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To prospectively assess circulating tumor cell (CTC) status at baseline (CTCBL) and after one cycle of a new line of systemic therapy (CTC1C), and changes from CTCBL to CTC1C (CTC kinetics, CTCKIN) for their utility in predicting response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).METHODS: CTCBL and CTC1C status was determined as negative (-) or positive (+) for < 5 or ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood using CellSearch{\texttrademark} (Veridex). CTCKIN was categorized as favorable (CTC1C-) or unfavorable (CTC1C+). Tumor response was to be assessed every 2-3 months using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Statistical analysis focused on the relation between CTC status and CTCKIN, and response, PFS, and OS.RESULTS: 133/393 (34%) patients enrolled were CTCBL+. CTC1C status after one cycle and radiological tumor response were assessed after median (range) periods of 1.2 (0.5-3.2) and 2.9 (0.5-4.8) months, respectively. 57/201 (28%) were CTC1C+. Median [95% confidence interval] PFS and OS (months) were significantly reduced in CTCBL+ vs. CTCBL- patients (PFS 4.7 [3.7-6.1] vs. 7.8 [6.4-9.2]; OS 10.4 [7.9-15.0] vs. 27.2 [22.3-29.9]), and for CTC1C+ vs. CTC1C- patients (PFS 4.3 [3.6-6.0] vs. 8.5 [6.6-10.4]; OS 7.7 [6.4-13.9] vs. 30.6 [22.6-not available]). Unfavorable CTCKIN was significantly associated with progressive disease. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed prognostic factors for shorter PFS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status) and shorter OS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, bone-and-visceral/local metastases, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status).CONCLUSIONS: CTCBL, CTC1C, and CTCKIN are predictive of outcome in MBC. Serial CTC enumeration is useful in tailoring systemic treatment of MBC.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Tumor Markers, Biological, Young Adult",
author = "Markus Wallwiener and Sabine Riethdorf and Hartkopf, {Andreas Daniel} and Caroline Modugno and Juliane Nees and Dharanija Madhavan and Sprick, {Martin Ronald} and Sarah Schott and Christoph Domschke and Ir{\`e}ne Baccelli and Birgitt Sch{\"o}nfisch and Barbara Burwinkel and Frederik Marm{\'e} and J{\"o}rg Heil and Christof Sohn and Klaus Pantel and Andreas Trumpp and Andreas Schneeweiss",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
day = "11",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2407-14-512",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "512",
journal = "BMC CANCER",
issn = "1471-2407",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serial enumeration of circulating tumor cells predicts treatment response andprognosis in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study in 393 patients

AU - Wallwiener, Markus

AU - Riethdorf, Sabine

AU - Hartkopf, Andreas Daniel

AU - Modugno, Caroline

AU - Nees, Juliane

AU - Madhavan, Dharanija

AU - Sprick, Martin Ronald

AU - Schott, Sarah

AU - Domschke, Christoph

AU - Baccelli, Irène

AU - Schönfisch, Birgitt

AU - Burwinkel, Barbara

AU - Marmé, Frederik

AU - Heil, Jörg

AU - Sohn, Christof

AU - Pantel, Klaus

AU - Trumpp, Andreas

AU - Schneeweiss, Andreas

PY - 2014/7/11

Y1 - 2014/7/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: To prospectively assess circulating tumor cell (CTC) status at baseline (CTCBL) and after one cycle of a new line of systemic therapy (CTC1C), and changes from CTCBL to CTC1C (CTC kinetics, CTCKIN) for their utility in predicting response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).METHODS: CTCBL and CTC1C status was determined as negative (-) or positive (+) for < 5 or ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood using CellSearch™ (Veridex). CTCKIN was categorized as favorable (CTC1C-) or unfavorable (CTC1C+). Tumor response was to be assessed every 2-3 months using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Statistical analysis focused on the relation between CTC status and CTCKIN, and response, PFS, and OS.RESULTS: 133/393 (34%) patients enrolled were CTCBL+. CTC1C status after one cycle and radiological tumor response were assessed after median (range) periods of 1.2 (0.5-3.2) and 2.9 (0.5-4.8) months, respectively. 57/201 (28%) were CTC1C+. Median [95% confidence interval] PFS and OS (months) were significantly reduced in CTCBL+ vs. CTCBL- patients (PFS 4.7 [3.7-6.1] vs. 7.8 [6.4-9.2]; OS 10.4 [7.9-15.0] vs. 27.2 [22.3-29.9]), and for CTC1C+ vs. CTC1C- patients (PFS 4.3 [3.6-6.0] vs. 8.5 [6.6-10.4]; OS 7.7 [6.4-13.9] vs. 30.6 [22.6-not available]). Unfavorable CTCKIN was significantly associated with progressive disease. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed prognostic factors for shorter PFS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status) and shorter OS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, bone-and-visceral/local metastases, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status).CONCLUSIONS: CTCBL, CTC1C, and CTCKIN are predictive of outcome in MBC. Serial CTC enumeration is useful in tailoring systemic treatment of MBC.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

AB - BACKGROUND: To prospectively assess circulating tumor cell (CTC) status at baseline (CTCBL) and after one cycle of a new line of systemic therapy (CTC1C), and changes from CTCBL to CTC1C (CTC kinetics, CTCKIN) for their utility in predicting response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).METHODS: CTCBL and CTC1C status was determined as negative (-) or positive (+) for < 5 or ≥ 5 CTCs/7.5 ml blood using CellSearch™ (Veridex). CTCKIN was categorized as favorable (CTC1C-) or unfavorable (CTC1C+). Tumor response was to be assessed every 2-3 months using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Statistical analysis focused on the relation between CTC status and CTCKIN, and response, PFS, and OS.RESULTS: 133/393 (34%) patients enrolled were CTCBL+. CTC1C status after one cycle and radiological tumor response were assessed after median (range) periods of 1.2 (0.5-3.2) and 2.9 (0.5-4.8) months, respectively. 57/201 (28%) were CTC1C+. Median [95% confidence interval] PFS and OS (months) were significantly reduced in CTCBL+ vs. CTCBL- patients (PFS 4.7 [3.7-6.1] vs. 7.8 [6.4-9.2]; OS 10.4 [7.9-15.0] vs. 27.2 [22.3-29.9]), and for CTC1C+ vs. CTC1C- patients (PFS 4.3 [3.6-6.0] vs. 8.5 [6.6-10.4]; OS 7.7 [6.4-13.9] vs. 30.6 [22.6-not available]). Unfavorable CTCKIN was significantly associated with progressive disease. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed prognostic factors for shorter PFS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status) and shorter OS (CTCBL+, persistent CTCs after one cycle, bone-and-visceral/local metastases, ≥ 3rd-line therapy, and triple-negative receptor status).CONCLUSIONS: CTCBL, CTC1C, and CTCKIN are predictive of outcome in MBC. Serial CTC enumeration is useful in tailoring systemic treatment of MBC.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Breast Neoplasms

KW - Disease-Free Survival

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasm Metastasis

KW - Neoplastic Cells, Circulating

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Tumor Markers, Biological

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2407-14-512

DO - 10.1186/1471-2407-14-512

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25015676

VL - 14

SP - 512

JO - BMC CANCER

JF - BMC CANCER

SN - 1471-2407

ER -