Second allogeneic transplants for multiple myeloma: a report from the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party

  • Patrick J Hayden
  • Dirk-Jan Eikema
  • Liesbeth C de Wreede
  • Linda Koster
  • Nicolaus Kröger
  • Hermann Einsele
  • Monique Minnema
  • Alida Dominietto
  • Michael Potter
  • Jacob Passweg
  • Arancha Bermúdez
  • Stephanie Nguyen-Quoc
  • Uwe Platzbecker
  • Johanna Tischer
  • Fabio Ciceri
  • Joan Hendrik Veelken
  • Per Ljungman
  • Nicolaas Schaap
  • Edouard Forcade
  • Angelo Michele Carella
  • Virginie Gandemer
  • William Arcese
  • Adrian Bloor
  • Attilio Olivieri
  • Laure Vincent
  • Meral Beksac
  • Stefan Schönland
  • Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha

Abstract

The EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party performed a retrospective analysis of 215 patients who underwent a second allo-HCT for myeloma between 1994 and 2017, 159 for relapse and 56 for graft failure. In the relapse group, overall survival (OS) was 38% (30-46%) at 2 years and 25% (17-32%) at 5 years. Patients who had a HLA-identical sibling (HLAid-Sib) donor for their first and second transplants had superior OS (5 year OS: HLAid-Sib/HLAid-Sib: 35% (24-46%); Others 9% (0-17%), p < 0.001). There was a significantly higher incidence of acute grade II-IV GvHD in those patients who had also developed GvHD following their initial HLA-identical sibling allo-HCT (HLAid-Sib/HLAid-Sib: 50% (33-67%); Other 22% (8-36%), p = 0.03). More as opposed to fewer than 2 years between transplants was associated with superior 5-yr OS (31% (21-40%) vs. 10% (1-20%), P = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, consecutive HLA-identical sibling donor transplants conferred a significant OS advantage (0.4 (0.24-0.67), p < 0.001). In the graft failure group, OS was 41% at 2 years. In summary, a second allo-HCT using a HLA-identical sibling donor, if available, provides the best transplant outcomes for relapsed myeloma in this setting.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0268-3369
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 10.2021
PubMed 33976382