Safety of Therapeutic Apheresis in Children and Adolescents

  • Christina Taylan
  • Anne Schaaf
  • Corina Dorn
  • Claus Peter Schmitt
  • Sebastian Loos
  • Nele Kanzelmeyer
  • Lars Pape
  • Dominik Müller
  • Lutz T Weber
  • Julia Thumfart

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is based on the principles of either removing dissolved pathogenic substances (e.g., antibodies) from the blood plasma or replacing plasma factors. It expands the therapeutic scope for a variety of diseases. Safety analysis in the pediatric field are scant. The aim of this analysis was to analyze specific complications of TA modalities - plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) - in children and adolescents.

Methods: Children and adolescents (n = 298) who had received TA from 2008 to 2018 in five pediatric nephrology centers were analyzed retrospectively. In total, 4.004 treatments (2.287 PE and 1.717 IA) were evaluated.

Results: Indications for TA were mainly nephrological and neurological diseases. The three main indications were antibody-mediated graft rejection (13.4%), hemolytic uremic syndrome mainly with neurological involvement (12.8%), and AB0-incompatible transplantation (11.7%). Complications developed in 440 of the 4004 sessions (11%), of which one third were non-specific (nausea, headache). IA was better tolerated than PE. Complications were reported in 9.5% (n = 163) of the IA versus 12.1% (277) of the PE sessions (p < 0.001). When considering different types of complications, significantly more non-specific/non-allergic events (p = 0.02) and allergic reactions occurred in PE sessions (p < 0.001). More complications occurred with PE, when using fresh frozen plasma (16.2%; n = 145) in comparison to human albumin (14.5%; n = 115) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Therapeutic apheresis in childhood and adolescence is a safe treatment procedure. IA showed a lower complication rate than PE. Therefore, IA may be preferably provided if the underlying disease pathomechanisms do not require PE.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer850819
ISSN2296-2360
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 2022

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

Copyright © 2022 Taylan, Schaaf, Dorn, Schmitt, Loos, Kanzelmeyer, Pape, Müller, Weber and Thumfart.

PubMed 35498796