Rucaparib or Physician's Choice in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

  • Karim Fizazi
  • Josep M Piulats
  • M Neil Reaume
  • Peter Ostler
  • Ray McDermott
  • Joel R Gingerich
  • Elias Pintus
  • Srikala S Sridhar
  • Richard M Bambury
  • Urban Emmenegger
  • Henriette Lindberg
  • David Morris
  • Franco Nolè
  • John Staffurth
  • Charles Redfern
  • María I Sáez
  • Wassim Abida
  • Gedske Daugaard
  • Axel Heidenreich
  • Laurence Krieger
  • Brieuc Sautois
  • Andrea Loehr
  • Darrin Despain
  • Catherine A Heyes
  • Simon P Watkins
  • Simon Chowdhury
  • Charles J Ryan
  • Alan H Bryce
  • TRITON3 Investigators

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a phase 2 study, rucaparib, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), showed a high level of activity in patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer associated with a deleterious BRCA alteration. Data are needed to confirm and expand on the findings of the phase 2 study.

METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM alteration and who had disease progression after treatment with a second-generation androgen-receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI). We randomly assigned the patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or a physician's choice control (docetaxel or a second-generation ARPI [abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide]). The primary outcome was the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival according to independent review.

RESULTS: Of the 4855 patients who had undergone prescreening or screening, 270 were assigned to receive rucaparib and 135 to receive a control medication (intention-to-treat population); in the two groups, 201 patients and 101 patients, respectively, had a BRCA alteration. At 62 months, the duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer in the rucaparib group than in the control group, both in the BRCA subgroup (median, 11.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.69) and in the intention-to-treat group (median, 10.2 months and 6.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001 for both comparisons). In an exploratory analysis in the ATM subgroup, the median duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was 8.1 months in the rucaparib group and 6.8 months in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.52). The most frequent adverse events with rucaparib were fatigue and nausea.

CONCLUSIONS: The duration of imaging-based progression-free survival was significantly longer with rucaparib than with a control medication among patients who had metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer with a BRCA alteration. (Funded by Clovis Oncology; TRITON3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02975934.).

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0028-4793
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 23.02.2023

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.

PubMed 36795891