Role of tumour-free margin distance for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer-a subset analysis of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie CaRE-1 multicenter study

  • Linn Woelber
  • Lis-Femke Griebel
  • Christine Eulenburg
  • Jalid Sehouli
  • Julia Jueckstock
  • Felix Hilpert
  • Nikolaus de Gregorio
  • Annette Hasenburg
  • Atanas Ignatov
  • Peter Hillemanns
  • Sophie Fuerst
  • Hans-Georg Strauss
  • Klaus H Baumann
  • Falk C Thiel
  • Alexander Mustea
  • Werner Meier
  • Philipp Harter
  • Pauline Wimberger
  • Lars Christian Hanker
  • Barbara Schmalfeldt
  • Ulrich Canzler
  • Tanja Fehm
  • Alexander Luyten
  • Martin Hellriegel
  • Jens Kosse
  • Christoph Heiss
  • Peer Hantschmann
  • Peter Mallmann
  • Berno Tanner
  • Jacobus Pfisterer
  • Barbara Richter
  • Petra Neuser
  • Sven Mahner

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: A tumour-free pathological resection margin of ≥8 mm is considered state-of-the-art. Available evidence is based on heterogeneous cohorts. This study was designed to clarify the relevance of the resection margin for loco-regional control in vulvar cancer.

METHODS: AGO-CaRE-1 is a large retrospective study. Patients (n = 1618) with vulvar cancer ≥ FIGO stage IB treated at 29 German gynecologic-cancer-centres 1998-2008 were included. This subgroup analysis focuses on solely surgically treated node-negative patients with complete tumour resection (n = 289).

RESULTS: Of the 289 analysed patients, 141 (48.8%) had pT1b, 140 (48.4%) pT2 and 8 (2.8%) pT3 tumours. One hundred twenty-five (43.3%) underwent complete vulvectomy, 127 (43.9%) partial vulvectomy and 37 (12.8%) radical local excision. The median minimal resection margin was 5 mm (1 mm-33 mm); all patients received groin staging, in 86.5% with full dissection. Median follow-up was 35.1 months. 46 (15.9%) patients developed recurrence, thereof 34 (11.8%) at the vulva, after a median of 18.3 months. Vulvar recurrence rates were 12.6% in patients with a margin <8 mm and 10.2% in patients with a margin ≥8 mm. When analysed as a continuous variable, the margin distance had no statistically significant impact on local recurrence (HR per mm increase: 0.930, 95% CI: 0.849-1.020; p = 0.125). Multivariate analyses did also not reveal a significant association between the margin and local recurrence neither when analysed as continuous variable nor categorically based on the 8 mm cutoff. Results were consistent when looking at disease-free-survival and time-to-recurrence at any site (HR per mm increase: 0.949, 95% CI: 0.864-1.041; p = 0.267).

CONCLUSIONS: The need for a minimal margin of 8 mm could not be confirmed in the large and homogeneous node-negative cohort of the AGO-CaRE database.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0959-8049
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 12.2016
PubMed 27837710