Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor

Standard

Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor. / Loibl, Sibylle; Weber, Karsten; Huober, Jens; Krappmann, Kristin; Marmé, Frederik; Schem, Christian; Engels, Knut; Pfitzner, Berit Maria; Kümmel, Sherko; Furlanetto, Jenny; Hartmann, Arndt; Darb-Esfahani, Silvia; Müller, Volkmar; Staebler, Annette; von Minckwitz, Gunter; Kronenwett, Ralf; Denkert, Carsten.

in: CLIN CANCER RES, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 14, 15.07.2018, S. 3358-3365.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Loibl, S, Weber, K, Huober, J, Krappmann, K, Marmé, F, Schem, C, Engels, K, Pfitzner, BM, Kümmel, S, Furlanetto, J, Hartmann, A, Darb-Esfahani, S, Müller, V, Staebler, A, von Minckwitz, G, Kronenwett, R & Denkert, C 2018, 'Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor', CLIN CANCER RES, Jg. 24, Nr. 14, S. 3358-3365. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947

APA

Loibl, S., Weber, K., Huober, J., Krappmann, K., Marmé, F., Schem, C., Engels, K., Pfitzner, B. M., Kümmel, S., Furlanetto, J., Hartmann, A., Darb-Esfahani, S., Müller, V., Staebler, A., von Minckwitz, G., Kronenwett, R., & Denkert, C. (2018). Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor. CLIN CANCER RES, 24(14), 3358-3365. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e8e52b2d9389403b9ac30d50b44fa821,
title = "Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.Experimental Design: A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).Results: A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; P < 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; P < 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; P < 0.001).Conclusions: The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3358-65. {\textcopyright}2018 AACR.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Sibylle Loibl and Karsten Weber and Jens Huober and Kristin Krappmann and Frederik Marm{\'e} and Christian Schem and Knut Engels and Pfitzner, {Berit Maria} and Sherko K{\"u}mmel and Jenny Furlanetto and Arndt Hartmann and Silvia Darb-Esfahani and Volkmar M{\"u}ller and Annette Staebler and {von Minckwitz}, Gunter and Ralf Kronenwett and Carsten Denkert",
note = "{\textcopyright}2018 American Association for Cancer Research.",
year = "2018",
month = jul,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "3358--3365",
journal = "CLIN CANCER RES",
issn = "1078-0432",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "14",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk Assessment after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal Breast Cancer Using a Clinicomolecular Predictor

AU - Loibl, Sibylle

AU - Weber, Karsten

AU - Huober, Jens

AU - Krappmann, Kristin

AU - Marmé, Frederik

AU - Schem, Christian

AU - Engels, Knut

AU - Pfitzner, Berit Maria

AU - Kümmel, Sherko

AU - Furlanetto, Jenny

AU - Hartmann, Arndt

AU - Darb-Esfahani, Silvia

AU - Müller, Volkmar

AU - Staebler, Annette

AU - von Minckwitz, Gunter

AU - Kronenwett, Ralf

AU - Denkert, Carsten

N1 - ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

PY - 2018/7/15

Y1 - 2018/7/15

N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.Experimental Design: A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).Results: A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; P < 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; P < 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; P < 0.001).Conclusions: The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3358-65. ©2018 AACR.

AB - Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a modified EPclin test (mEPclin), a combination of EndoPredict (EP) score, post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor size and nodal status, for predicting the risk of distance recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with residual estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. We also compared the prognostic power of the mEPclin with that of the CPS-EG score.Experimental Design: A total of 428 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples from GeparTrio and GeparQuattro studies were evaluated for mRNA expression of eight cancer-related and three reference genes. The mEPclin score was computed using a modified algorithm and predefined cut-off values were used to classify each patient at low or high risk. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).Results: A higher continuous mEPclin score was significantly associated with increased risk of relapse [HR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.86-2.51; P < 0.001] and death (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.90-2.75; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients classified at high risk by dichotomous mEPclin showed significantly poorer DFS and overall survival compared with those at low risk. In contrast with CPS-EG, the mEPclin remained significantly prognostic for DFS in multivariate analysis (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.73-2.63; P < 0.001). Combining CPS-EG and other clinicopathological variables with mEPclin yielded a significant improvement of the prognostic power for DFS versus without mEPclin (c-indices: 0.748 vs. 0.660; P < 0.001).Conclusions: The mEPclin score independently predicted the risk of distance recurrence and provided additional prognostic information to the CPS-EG score to assess more accurately the prognosis after NACT in the luminal non-pCR patient population. Therefore, this approach can be used to select patients for additional post-neoadjuvant therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3358-65. ©2018 AACR.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947

DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2947

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29618617

VL - 24

SP - 3358

EP - 3365

JO - CLIN CANCER RES

JF - CLIN CANCER RES

SN - 1078-0432

IS - 14

ER -