Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial

Standard

Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. / Phillips, Richard O; Robert, Jérôme; Abass, Kabiru Mohamed; Thompson, William; Sarfo, Fred Stephen; Wilson, Tuah; Sarpong, Godfred; Gateau, Thierry; Chauty, Annick; Omollo, Raymond; Ochieng Otieno, Michael; Egondi, Thaddaeus W; Ampadu, Edwin O; Agossadou, Didier; Marion, Estelle; Ganlonon, Line; Wansbrough-Jones, Mark; Grosset, Jacques; Macdonald, John M; Treadwell, Terry; Saunderson, Paul; Paintsil, Albert; Lehman, Linda; Frimpong, Michael; Sarpong, Nanaa Francisca; Saizonou, Raoul; Tiendrebeogo, Alexandre; Ohene, Sally-Ann; Stienstra, Ymkje; Asiedu, Kingsley B; van der Werf, Tjip S; study team.

in: LANCET, Jahrgang 395, Nr. 10232, 18.04.2020, S. 1259-1267.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschung

Harvard

Phillips, RO, Robert, J, Abass, KM, Thompson, W, Sarfo, FS, Wilson, T, Sarpong, G, Gateau, T, Chauty, A, Omollo, R, Ochieng Otieno, M, Egondi, TW, Ampadu, EO, Agossadou, D, Marion, E, Ganlonon, L, Wansbrough-Jones, M, Grosset, J, Macdonald, JM, Treadwell, T, Saunderson, P, Paintsil, A, Lehman, L, Frimpong, M, Sarpong, NF, Saizonou, R, Tiendrebeogo, A, Ohene, S-A, Stienstra, Y, Asiedu, KB, van der Werf, TS & study team 2020, 'Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial', LANCET, Jg. 395, Nr. 10232, S. 1259-1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30047-7

APA

Phillips, R. O., Robert, J., Abass, K. M., Thompson, W., Sarfo, F. S., Wilson, T., Sarpong, G., Gateau, T., Chauty, A., Omollo, R., Ochieng Otieno, M., Egondi, T. W., Ampadu, E. O., Agossadou, D., Marion, E., Ganlonon, L., Wansbrough-Jones, M., Grosset, J., Macdonald, J. M., ... study team (2020). Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. LANCET, 395(10232), 1259-1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30047-7

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8355b0ca0edd484a82ee16bece28d7aa,
title = "Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection that damages the skin and subcutis. It is most prevalent in western and central Africa and Australia. Standard antimicrobial treatment with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus intramuscular streptomycin 15 mg/kg once daily for 8 weeks (RS8) is highly effective, but streptomycin injections are painful and potentially harmful. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fully oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus clarithromycin 15 mg/kg extended release once daily for 8 weeks (RC8) with that of RS8 for treatment of early Buruli ulcer lesions.METHODS: We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised (1:1 with blocks of six), multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial comparing fully oral RC8 with RS8 in patients with early, limited Buruli ulcer lesions. There were four trial sites in hospitals in Ghana (Agogo, Tepa, Nkawie, Dunkwa) and one in Benin (Pob{\`e}). Participants were included if they were aged 5 years or older and had typical Buruli ulcer with no more than one lesion (caterories I and II) no larger than 10 cm in diameter. The trial was open label, and neither the investigators who took measurements of the lesions nor the attending doctors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary clinical endpoint was lesion healing (ie, full epithelialisation or stable scar) without recurrence at 52 weeks after start of antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect inferiority of RC8 by a margin of 12%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01659437.FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2017, participants were recruited to the trial. We stopped recruitment after 310 participants. Median age of participants was 14 years (IQR 10-29) and 153 (52%) were female. 297 patients had PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer; 151 (51%) were assigned to RS8 treatment, and 146 (49%) received oral RC8 treatment. In the RS8 group, lesions healed in 144 (95%, 95% CI 91 to 98) of 151 patients, whereas lesions healed in 140 (96%, 91 to 99) of 146 patients in the RC8 group. The difference in proportion, -0·5% (-5·2 to 4·2), was not significantly greater than zero (p=0·59), showing that RC8 treatment is non-inferior to RS8 treatment for lesion healing at 52 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 20 (13%) patients receiving RS8 and in nine (7%) patients receiving RC8. Most adverse events were grade 1-2, but one (1%) patient receiving RS8 developed serious ototoxicity and ended treatment after 6 weeks. No patients needed surgical resection. Four patients (two in each study group) had skin grafts.INTERPRETATION: Fully oral RC8 regimen was non-inferior to RS8 for treatment of early, limited Buruli ulcer and was associated with fewer adverse events. Therefore, we propose that fully oral RC8 should be the preferred therapy for early, limited lesions of Buruli ulcer.FUNDING: WHO with additional support from MAP International, American Leprosy Missions, Fondation Raoul Follereau France, Buruli ulcer Groningen Foundation, Sanofi-Pasteur, and BuruliVac.",
keywords = "Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Benin, Buruli Ulcer/drug therapy, Child, Clarithromycin/administration & dosage, Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Ghana, Humans, Male, Rifampin/administration & dosage, Streptomycin/administration & dosage, Wound Healing/drug effects, Young Adult",
author = "Phillips, {Richard O} and J{\'e}r{\^o}me Robert and Abass, {Kabiru Mohamed} and William Thompson and Sarfo, {Fred Stephen} and Tuah Wilson and Godfred Sarpong and Thierry Gateau and Annick Chauty and Raymond Omollo and {Ochieng Otieno}, Michael and Egondi, {Thaddaeus W} and Ampadu, {Edwin O} and Didier Agossadou and Estelle Marion and Line Ganlonon and Mark Wansbrough-Jones and Jacques Grosset and Macdonald, {John M} and Terry Treadwell and Paul Saunderson and Albert Paintsil and Linda Lehman and Michael Frimpong and Sarpong, {Nanaa Francisca} and Raoul Saizonou and Alexandre Tiendrebeogo and Sally-Ann Ohene and Ymkje Stienstra and Asiedu, {Kingsley B} and {van der Werf}, {Tjip S} and {study team} and Till Omansen",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30047-7",
language = "English",
volume = "395",
pages = "1259--1267",
journal = "LANCET",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10232",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial

AU - Phillips, Richard O

AU - Robert, Jérôme

AU - Abass, Kabiru Mohamed

AU - Thompson, William

AU - Sarfo, Fred Stephen

AU - Wilson, Tuah

AU - Sarpong, Godfred

AU - Gateau, Thierry

AU - Chauty, Annick

AU - Omollo, Raymond

AU - Ochieng Otieno, Michael

AU - Egondi, Thaddaeus W

AU - Ampadu, Edwin O

AU - Agossadou, Didier

AU - Marion, Estelle

AU - Ganlonon, Line

AU - Wansbrough-Jones, Mark

AU - Grosset, Jacques

AU - Macdonald, John M

AU - Treadwell, Terry

AU - Saunderson, Paul

AU - Paintsil, Albert

AU - Lehman, Linda

AU - Frimpong, Michael

AU - Sarpong, Nanaa Francisca

AU - Saizonou, Raoul

AU - Tiendrebeogo, Alexandre

AU - Ohene, Sally-Ann

AU - Stienstra, Ymkje

AU - Asiedu, Kingsley B

AU - van der Werf, Tjip S

AU - study team

AU - Omansen, Till

N1 - © 2020 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.

PY - 2020/4/18

Y1 - 2020/4/18

N2 - BACKGROUND: Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection that damages the skin and subcutis. It is most prevalent in western and central Africa and Australia. Standard antimicrobial treatment with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus intramuscular streptomycin 15 mg/kg once daily for 8 weeks (RS8) is highly effective, but streptomycin injections are painful and potentially harmful. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fully oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus clarithromycin 15 mg/kg extended release once daily for 8 weeks (RC8) with that of RS8 for treatment of early Buruli ulcer lesions.METHODS: We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised (1:1 with blocks of six), multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial comparing fully oral RC8 with RS8 in patients with early, limited Buruli ulcer lesions. There were four trial sites in hospitals in Ghana (Agogo, Tepa, Nkawie, Dunkwa) and one in Benin (Pobè). Participants were included if they were aged 5 years or older and had typical Buruli ulcer with no more than one lesion (caterories I and II) no larger than 10 cm in diameter. The trial was open label, and neither the investigators who took measurements of the lesions nor the attending doctors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary clinical endpoint was lesion healing (ie, full epithelialisation or stable scar) without recurrence at 52 weeks after start of antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect inferiority of RC8 by a margin of 12%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01659437.FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2017, participants were recruited to the trial. We stopped recruitment after 310 participants. Median age of participants was 14 years (IQR 10-29) and 153 (52%) were female. 297 patients had PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer; 151 (51%) were assigned to RS8 treatment, and 146 (49%) received oral RC8 treatment. In the RS8 group, lesions healed in 144 (95%, 95% CI 91 to 98) of 151 patients, whereas lesions healed in 140 (96%, 91 to 99) of 146 patients in the RC8 group. The difference in proportion, -0·5% (-5·2 to 4·2), was not significantly greater than zero (p=0·59), showing that RC8 treatment is non-inferior to RS8 treatment for lesion healing at 52 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 20 (13%) patients receiving RS8 and in nine (7%) patients receiving RC8. Most adverse events were grade 1-2, but one (1%) patient receiving RS8 developed serious ototoxicity and ended treatment after 6 weeks. No patients needed surgical resection. Four patients (two in each study group) had skin grafts.INTERPRETATION: Fully oral RC8 regimen was non-inferior to RS8 for treatment of early, limited Buruli ulcer and was associated with fewer adverse events. Therefore, we propose that fully oral RC8 should be the preferred therapy for early, limited lesions of Buruli ulcer.FUNDING: WHO with additional support from MAP International, American Leprosy Missions, Fondation Raoul Follereau France, Buruli ulcer Groningen Foundation, Sanofi-Pasteur, and BuruliVac.

AB - BACKGROUND: Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection that damages the skin and subcutis. It is most prevalent in western and central Africa and Australia. Standard antimicrobial treatment with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus intramuscular streptomycin 15 mg/kg once daily for 8 weeks (RS8) is highly effective, but streptomycin injections are painful and potentially harmful. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fully oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus clarithromycin 15 mg/kg extended release once daily for 8 weeks (RC8) with that of RS8 for treatment of early Buruli ulcer lesions.METHODS: We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised (1:1 with blocks of six), multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial comparing fully oral RC8 with RS8 in patients with early, limited Buruli ulcer lesions. There were four trial sites in hospitals in Ghana (Agogo, Tepa, Nkawie, Dunkwa) and one in Benin (Pobè). Participants were included if they were aged 5 years or older and had typical Buruli ulcer with no more than one lesion (caterories I and II) no larger than 10 cm in diameter. The trial was open label, and neither the investigators who took measurements of the lesions nor the attending doctors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary clinical endpoint was lesion healing (ie, full epithelialisation or stable scar) without recurrence at 52 weeks after start of antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect inferiority of RC8 by a margin of 12%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01659437.FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2017, participants were recruited to the trial. We stopped recruitment after 310 participants. Median age of participants was 14 years (IQR 10-29) and 153 (52%) were female. 297 patients had PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer; 151 (51%) were assigned to RS8 treatment, and 146 (49%) received oral RC8 treatment. In the RS8 group, lesions healed in 144 (95%, 95% CI 91 to 98) of 151 patients, whereas lesions healed in 140 (96%, 91 to 99) of 146 patients in the RC8 group. The difference in proportion, -0·5% (-5·2 to 4·2), was not significantly greater than zero (p=0·59), showing that RC8 treatment is non-inferior to RS8 treatment for lesion healing at 52 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 20 (13%) patients receiving RS8 and in nine (7%) patients receiving RC8. Most adverse events were grade 1-2, but one (1%) patient receiving RS8 developed serious ototoxicity and ended treatment after 6 weeks. No patients needed surgical resection. Four patients (two in each study group) had skin grafts.INTERPRETATION: Fully oral RC8 regimen was non-inferior to RS8 for treatment of early, limited Buruli ulcer and was associated with fewer adverse events. Therefore, we propose that fully oral RC8 should be the preferred therapy for early, limited lesions of Buruli ulcer.FUNDING: WHO with additional support from MAP International, American Leprosy Missions, Fondation Raoul Follereau France, Buruli ulcer Groningen Foundation, Sanofi-Pasteur, and BuruliVac.

KW - Administration, Oral

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents

KW - Benin

KW - Buruli Ulcer/drug therapy

KW - Child

KW - Clarithromycin/administration & dosage

KW - Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage

KW - Drug Therapy, Combination

KW - Female

KW - Ghana

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Rifampin/administration & dosage

KW - Streptomycin/administration & dosage

KW - Wound Healing/drug effects

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30047-7

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30047-7

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32171422

VL - 395

SP - 1259

EP - 1267

JO - LANCET

JF - LANCET

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 10232

ER -