Revival of transcatheter PFO closure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - impact of shunt size and age
Standard
Revival of transcatheter PFO closure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - impact of shunt size and age. / Reinthaler, Markus; Ozga, Ann-Kathrin; Sinning, David; Curio, Jonathan; Al-Hindwan, Haitham S; Bäckemo Johansson, Johan; Jung, Friedrich; Lendlein, Andreas; Rauch, Geraldine; Landmesser, Ulf.
in: AM HEART J, Jahrgang 201, 07.2018, S. 95-102.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Revival of transcatheter PFO closure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - impact of shunt size and age
AU - Reinthaler, Markus
AU - Ozga, Ann-Kathrin
AU - Sinning, David
AU - Curio, Jonathan
AU - Al-Hindwan, Haitham S
AU - Bäckemo Johansson, Johan
AU - Jung, Friedrich
AU - Lendlein, Andreas
AU - Rauch, Geraldine
AU - Landmesser, Ulf
N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: Transcatheter foramen ovale closure (TPC) has emerged as a potential treatment option for patients with cryptogenic strokes and persistent foramen ovale (PFO). However, previous randomized controlled trials could hardly demonstrate any benefit compared to medical treatment (Med-Tx). Recently new data have become available which may change current practice of transcatheter PFO closure.METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing TPC and Med-Tx based on all available multicentric randomized controlled trials was performed. The primary outcome of interest was the recurrence of stroke in both groups.RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria with 1829 patients in the TPC and 1622 in the Med-Tx group. The median follow-up was 4 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis we found a statistically significant relative risk reduction in recurrence of strokes in the TPC group compared to the Med-Tx group (pooled hazard ratio (HR): 0.32; 95% CI: 0.13-0.8; P = .018). Excluding one study due to potential publication bias resulted in a pooled HR of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25-0.91, P = .024). Patients younger than 45 years of age (pooled HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16-0.75; P = .007) and those with moderate to severe shunt (pooled HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.55; P < .001) were more likely to benefit from closure.CONCLUSION: According to our meta-analysis TPC plus antiplatelets was superior in terms of stroke prevention when compared to Med-Tx. Furthermore, patients with moderate to severe shunts and those younger than 45 years of age were found to benefit most from TPC.
AB - BACKGROUND: Transcatheter foramen ovale closure (TPC) has emerged as a potential treatment option for patients with cryptogenic strokes and persistent foramen ovale (PFO). However, previous randomized controlled trials could hardly demonstrate any benefit compared to medical treatment (Med-Tx). Recently new data have become available which may change current practice of transcatheter PFO closure.METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing TPC and Med-Tx based on all available multicentric randomized controlled trials was performed. The primary outcome of interest was the recurrence of stroke in both groups.RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria with 1829 patients in the TPC and 1622 in the Med-Tx group. The median follow-up was 4 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis we found a statistically significant relative risk reduction in recurrence of strokes in the TPC group compared to the Med-Tx group (pooled hazard ratio (HR): 0.32; 95% CI: 0.13-0.8; P = .018). Excluding one study due to potential publication bias resulted in a pooled HR of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.25-0.91, P = .024). Patients younger than 45 years of age (pooled HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16-0.75; P = .007) and those with moderate to severe shunt (pooled HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.55; P < .001) were more likely to benefit from closure.CONCLUSION: According to our meta-analysis TPC plus antiplatelets was superior in terms of stroke prevention when compared to Med-Tx. Furthermore, patients with moderate to severe shunts and those younger than 45 years of age were found to benefit most from TPC.
KW - Journal Article
KW - Review
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.025
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.025
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 29910060
VL - 201
SP - 95
EP - 102
JO - AM HEART J
JF - AM HEART J
SN - 0002-8703
ER -