Retrospective investigation of the 3D effects of the Carriere Motion 3D appliance using model and cephalometric superimposition

Standard

Retrospective investigation of the 3D effects of the Carriere Motion 3D appliance using model and cephalometric superimposition. / Schmid-Herrmann, Carmen; Delfs, Jesper; Mahaini, Luai; Schumacher, Eliane; Hirsch, Christian; Köhne, Till; Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel.

in: CLIN ORAL INVEST, Jahrgang 27, Nr. 2, 02.2023, S. 631-643.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a63fb87574f34af5a6be904121d2b58e,
title = "Retrospective investigation of the 3D effects of the Carriere Motion 3D appliance using model and cephalometric superimposition",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Carriere Motion 3D{\texttrademark} appliance (CMA) represents a method for molar distalization and correction of class II malocclusion. The aim was to investigate the 3D effects of the CMA by superimposing digital models and cephalometric X-rays.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 16 patients treated with CMA in combination with class II elastics. We compared digitized models and cephalometric X-rays of records taken before therapy and after the removal of CMA. The records were superimposed to assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes. The results of the cephalometric X-ray analysis were compared to an untreated age- and gender-matched sample.RESULTS: Class II occlusion was corrected after 11.85 ± 4.70 months by 3.45 ± 2.33 mm. The average distalization of the upper first molars was 0.96 ± 0.80 mm. The analysis of the cephalometric X-rays confirmed a distalization of the upper first molars with distal tipping and revealed a mesialization of the lower first molars of 1.91 ± 1.72 mm. Importantly, CMA resulted in a mild correction of the skeletal class II relationship (ANB: - 0.71 ± 0.77°; Wits: - 1.99 ± 1.74 mm) and a protrusion of the lower incisors (2.94 ± 2.52°). Compared to the untreated control group, there was significant distalization of the upper first molars and canines with mesialization and extrusion of the lower first molars.CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CMA is an efficient method for treating class II malocclusions. However, the class II correction is only partially caused by a distalization of the upper molars.",
author = "Carmen Schmid-Herrmann and Jesper Delfs and Luai Mahaini and Eliane Schumacher and Christian Hirsch and Till K{\"o}hne and B{\"a}rbel Kahl-Nieke",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1007/s00784-022-04768-4",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "631--643",
journal = "CLIN ORAL INVEST",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retrospective investigation of the 3D effects of the Carriere Motion 3D appliance using model and cephalometric superimposition

AU - Schmid-Herrmann, Carmen

AU - Delfs, Jesper

AU - Mahaini, Luai

AU - Schumacher, Eliane

AU - Hirsch, Christian

AU - Köhne, Till

AU - Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel

PY - 2023/2

Y1 - 2023/2

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Carriere Motion 3D™ appliance (CMA) represents a method for molar distalization and correction of class II malocclusion. The aim was to investigate the 3D effects of the CMA by superimposing digital models and cephalometric X-rays.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 16 patients treated with CMA in combination with class II elastics. We compared digitized models and cephalometric X-rays of records taken before therapy and after the removal of CMA. The records were superimposed to assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes. The results of the cephalometric X-ray analysis were compared to an untreated age- and gender-matched sample.RESULTS: Class II occlusion was corrected after 11.85 ± 4.70 months by 3.45 ± 2.33 mm. The average distalization of the upper first molars was 0.96 ± 0.80 mm. The analysis of the cephalometric X-rays confirmed a distalization of the upper first molars with distal tipping and revealed a mesialization of the lower first molars of 1.91 ± 1.72 mm. Importantly, CMA resulted in a mild correction of the skeletal class II relationship (ANB: - 0.71 ± 0.77°; Wits: - 1.99 ± 1.74 mm) and a protrusion of the lower incisors (2.94 ± 2.52°). Compared to the untreated control group, there was significant distalization of the upper first molars and canines with mesialization and extrusion of the lower first molars.CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CMA is an efficient method for treating class II malocclusions. However, the class II correction is only partially caused by a distalization of the upper molars.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Carriere Motion 3D™ appliance (CMA) represents a method for molar distalization and correction of class II malocclusion. The aim was to investigate the 3D effects of the CMA by superimposing digital models and cephalometric X-rays.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 16 patients treated with CMA in combination with class II elastics. We compared digitized models and cephalometric X-rays of records taken before therapy and after the removal of CMA. The records were superimposed to assess the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes. The results of the cephalometric X-ray analysis were compared to an untreated age- and gender-matched sample.RESULTS: Class II occlusion was corrected after 11.85 ± 4.70 months by 3.45 ± 2.33 mm. The average distalization of the upper first molars was 0.96 ± 0.80 mm. The analysis of the cephalometric X-rays confirmed a distalization of the upper first molars with distal tipping and revealed a mesialization of the lower first molars of 1.91 ± 1.72 mm. Importantly, CMA resulted in a mild correction of the skeletal class II relationship (ANB: - 0.71 ± 0.77°; Wits: - 1.99 ± 1.74 mm) and a protrusion of the lower incisors (2.94 ± 2.52°). Compared to the untreated control group, there was significant distalization of the upper first molars and canines with mesialization and extrusion of the lower first molars.CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CMA is an efficient method for treating class II malocclusions. However, the class II correction is only partially caused by a distalization of the upper molars.

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-022-04768-4

DO - 10.1007/s00784-022-04768-4

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36355224

VL - 27

SP - 631

EP - 643

JO - CLIN ORAL INVEST

JF - CLIN ORAL INVEST

SN - 1432-6981

IS - 2

ER -