Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia

  • Francesco Lo-Coco
  • Giuseppe Avvisati
  • Marco Vignetti
  • Christian Thiede
  • Sonia Maria Orlando
  • Simona Iacobelli
  • Felicetto Ferrara
  • Paola Fazi
  • Laura Cicconi
  • Eros Di Bona
  • Giorgina Specchia
  • Simona Sica
  • Mariadomenica Divona
  • Alessandro Levis
  • Walter Fiedler
  • Elisa Cerqui
  • Massimo Breccia
  • Giuseppe Fioritoni
  • Helmut R Salih
  • Mario Cazzola
  • Lorella Melillo
  • Angelo M Carella
  • Christian H Brandts
  • Enrica Morra
  • Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
  • Bernd Hertenstein
  • Mohammed Wattad
  • Michael Lübbert
  • Matthias Hänel
  • Norbert Schmitz
  • Hartmut Link
  • Maria Grazia Kropp
  • Alessandro Rambaldi
  • Giorgio La Nasa
  • Mario Luppi
  • Fabio Ciceri
  • Olimpia Finizio
  • Adriano Venditti
  • Francesco Fabbiano
  • Konstanze Döhner
  • Michaela Sauer
  • Arnold Ganser
  • Sergio Amadori
  • Franco Mandelli
  • Hartmut Döhner
  • Gerhard Ehninger
  • Richard F Schlenk
  • Uwe Platzbecker
  • Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) with chemotherapy is the standard of care for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), resulting in cure rates exceeding 80%. Pilot studies of treatment with arsenic trioxide with or without ATRA have shown high efficacy and reduced hematologic toxicity.

METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, multicenter trial comparing ATRA plus chemotherapy with ATRA plus arsenic trioxide in patients with APL classified as low-to-intermediate risk (white-cell count, ≤10×10(9) per liter). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ATRA plus arsenic trioxide for induction and consolidation therapy or standard ATRA-idarubicin induction therapy followed by three cycles of consolidation therapy with ATRA plus chemotherapy and maintenance therapy with low-dose chemotherapy and ATRA. The study was designed as a noninferiority trial to show that the difference between the rates of event-free survival at 2 years in the two groups was not greater than 5%.

RESULTS: Complete remission was achieved in all 77 patients in the ATRA-arsenic trioxide group who could be evaluated (100%) and in 75 of 79 patients in the ATRA-chemotherapy group (95%) (P=0.12). The median follow-up was 34.4 months. Two-year event-free survival rates were 97% in the ATRA-arsenic trioxide group and 86% in the ATRA-chemotherapy group (95% confidence interval for the difference, 2 to 22 percentage points; P<0.001 for noninferiority and P=0.02 for superiority of ATRA-arsenic trioxide). Overall survival was also better with ATRA-arsenic trioxide (P=0.02). As compared with ATRA-chemotherapy, ATRA-arsenic trioxide was associated with less hematologic toxicity and fewer infections but with more hepatic toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS: ATRA plus arsenic trioxide is at least not inferior and may be superior to ATRA plus chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with low-to-intermediate-risk APL. (Funded by Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00482833.).

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 11.07.2013
PubMed 23841729