Residual Flow Inside the Woven EndoBridge Device at Follow-Up: Potential Predictors of the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon

Standard

Residual Flow Inside the Woven EndoBridge Device at Follow-Up: Potential Predictors of the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon. / Nawka, M T; Lohse, A; Bester, M; Fiehler, J; Buhk, J-H.

in: AM J NEURORADIOL, Jahrgang 41, Nr. 7, 07.2020, S. 1232-1237.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{82a8767c4a854ab2a1c842e017139688,
title = "Residual Flow Inside the Woven EndoBridge Device at Follow-Up: Potential Predictors of the Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an established technique for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Occasionally, persistent opacification inside the WEB lumen can be observed at follow-up (previously described as Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score 1). We evaluated potential risk factors of this phenomenon, hypothesizing that initial deviation of the WEB device from the aneurysm axis, size of the aneurysmal neck surface, or inappropriate WEB sizing correlates with Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score 1 findings.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed all patients treated with the WEB device between February 2014 and December 2018 in our neurointerventional center. Patients with midterm follow-up DSA available were considered for aneurysm evaluation applying the Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score. WEB angle deviation from the aneurysm axis, neck widths, and WEB sizes were collected.RESULTS: We included 65 patients with 67 intracranial aneurysms. Eleven of 67 (16.4%) intracranial aneurysms showed the Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon at follow-up. Anterior-posterior projections of WEB axis deviation (angles measured in degrees) were significantly different between the Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score 1 cohort (median ± interquartile range, 17 ± 17) and all other Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Scores (median ± interquartile range, 7 ± 11; P = .023), whereas in lateral projections, no significant difference was observed (median ± interquartile range, 10 ± 10 versus 8 ± 9; P = .169). Neck or aneurysm recurrence, but not the Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon, occurred significantly more often in patients with inappropriate WEB sizing compared with appropriate WEB sizing (median ± interquartile range, 1 ± 1.3 versus 0 ± 0; P < .001/P = .664).CONCLUSIONS: The Bic{\^e}tre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon is associated with an initial deviation of the WEB device from the aneurysm axis but does not correlate with aneurysmal neck surface measurements or WEB sizing.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Disease Progression, Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation, Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation, Female, Humans, Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Nawka, {M T} and A Lohse and M Bester and J Fiehler and J-H Buhk",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A6605",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1232--1237",
journal = "AM J NEURORADIOL",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residual Flow Inside the Woven EndoBridge Device at Follow-Up: Potential Predictors of the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon

AU - Nawka, M T

AU - Lohse, A

AU - Bester, M

AU - Fiehler, J

AU - Buhk, J-H

N1 - © 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

PY - 2020/7

Y1 - 2020/7

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an established technique for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Occasionally, persistent opacification inside the WEB lumen can be observed at follow-up (previously described as Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1). We evaluated potential risk factors of this phenomenon, hypothesizing that initial deviation of the WEB device from the aneurysm axis, size of the aneurysmal neck surface, or inappropriate WEB sizing correlates with Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 findings.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed all patients treated with the WEB device between February 2014 and December 2018 in our neurointerventional center. Patients with midterm follow-up DSA available were considered for aneurysm evaluation applying the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score. WEB angle deviation from the aneurysm axis, neck widths, and WEB sizes were collected.RESULTS: We included 65 patients with 67 intracranial aneurysms. Eleven of 67 (16.4%) intracranial aneurysms showed the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon at follow-up. Anterior-posterior projections of WEB axis deviation (angles measured in degrees) were significantly different between the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 cohort (median ± interquartile range, 17 ± 17) and all other Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Scores (median ± interquartile range, 7 ± 11; P = .023), whereas in lateral projections, no significant difference was observed (median ± interquartile range, 10 ± 10 versus 8 ± 9; P = .169). Neck or aneurysm recurrence, but not the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon, occurred significantly more often in patients with inappropriate WEB sizing compared with appropriate WEB sizing (median ± interquartile range, 1 ± 1.3 versus 0 ± 0; P < .001/P = .664).CONCLUSIONS: The Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon is associated with an initial deviation of the WEB device from the aneurysm axis but does not correlate with aneurysmal neck surface measurements or WEB sizing.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an established technique for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Occasionally, persistent opacification inside the WEB lumen can be observed at follow-up (previously described as Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1). We evaluated potential risk factors of this phenomenon, hypothesizing that initial deviation of the WEB device from the aneurysm axis, size of the aneurysmal neck surface, or inappropriate WEB sizing correlates with Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 findings.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed all patients treated with the WEB device between February 2014 and December 2018 in our neurointerventional center. Patients with midterm follow-up DSA available were considered for aneurysm evaluation applying the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score. WEB angle deviation from the aneurysm axis, neck widths, and WEB sizes were collected.RESULTS: We included 65 patients with 67 intracranial aneurysms. Eleven of 67 (16.4%) intracranial aneurysms showed the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon at follow-up. Anterior-posterior projections of WEB axis deviation (angles measured in degrees) were significantly different between the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 cohort (median ± interquartile range, 17 ± 17) and all other Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Scores (median ± interquartile range, 7 ± 11; P = .023), whereas in lateral projections, no significant difference was observed (median ± interquartile range, 10 ± 10 versus 8 ± 9; P = .169). Neck or aneurysm recurrence, but not the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon, occurred significantly more often in patients with inappropriate WEB sizing compared with appropriate WEB sizing (median ± interquartile range, 1 ± 1.3 versus 0 ± 0; P < .001/P = .664).CONCLUSIONS: The Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 phenomenon is associated with an initial deviation of the WEB device from the aneurysm axis but does not correlate with aneurysmal neck surface measurements or WEB sizing.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Blood Vessel Prosthesis

KW - Disease Progression

KW - Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation

KW - Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A6605

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A6605

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32586965

VL - 41

SP - 1232

EP - 1237

JO - AM J NEURORADIOL

JF - AM J NEURORADIOL

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 7

ER -