Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures

Standard

Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures. / Nothacker, Monika; Stokes, Tim; Shaw, Beth; Lindsay, Patrice; Sipilä, Raija; Follmann, Markus; Kopp, Ina; Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) Performance Measures Working Group.

in: IMPLEMENT SCI, Jahrgang 11, 2016, S. 6.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Nothacker, M, Stokes, T, Shaw, B, Lindsay, P, Sipilä, R, Follmann, M, Kopp, I & Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) Performance Measures Working Group 2016, 'Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures', IMPLEMENT SCI, Jg. 11, S. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z

APA

Nothacker, M., Stokes, T., Shaw, B., Lindsay, P., Sipilä, R., Follmann, M., Kopp, I., & Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) Performance Measures Working Group (2016). Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures. IMPLEMENT SCI, 11, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z

Vancouver

Nothacker M, Stokes T, Shaw B, Lindsay P, Sipilä R, Follmann M et al. Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures. IMPLEMENT SCI. 2016;11:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z

Bibtex

@article{2f39128da99d4a51b2bb793bdfcdc17f,
title = "Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) aims to promote high quality clinical guideline development and implementation. Guideline-based performance measures are a key implementation tool and are widely used internationally for quality improvement, quality assurance, and pay for performance in health care. There is, however, no international consensus on best methods for guideline-based performance measures. In order to address this issue, the G-I-N Performance Measures Working Group aimed to develop a set of consensus-based reporting standards for guideline-based performance measure development and re-evaluation.METHODS: Methodology publications on guideline-based performance measures were identified from a systematic literature review and analyzed. Core criteria for the development and evaluation process of guideline-based performance measures were determined and refined into draft standards with an associated rationale and description of the evidence base. In a two-round Delphi-process, the group members appraised and approved the draft standards. After the first round, the group met to discuss comments and revised the drafts accordingly.RESULTS: Twenty-one methodology publications were reviewed. The group reached strong consensus on nine reporting standards concerning: (1) selection of clinical guidelines, (2) extraction of clinical guideline recommendations, (3) description of the measure development process, (4) measure appraisal, (5) measure specification, (6) description of the intended use of the measure, (7) measure testing/validating, (8) measure review/re-evaluation, and (9) composition of the measure development panel.CONCLUSIONS: These proposed international reporting standards address core components of guideline-based performance measure development and re-evaluation. They are intended to contribute to international reporting harmonization and improvement of methods for performance measures. Further research is required regarding validity, acceptability, and practicality.",
keywords = "Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Competence, Journal Article, Review",
author = "Monika Nothacker and Tim Stokes and Beth Shaw and Patrice Lindsay and Raija Sipil{\"a} and Markus Follmann and Ina Kopp and {Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) Performance Measures Working Group}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "6",
journal = "IMPLEMENT SCI",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures

AU - Nothacker, Monika

AU - Stokes, Tim

AU - Shaw, Beth

AU - Lindsay, Patrice

AU - Sipilä, Raija

AU - Follmann, Markus

AU - Kopp, Ina

AU - Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) Performance Measures Working Group

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) aims to promote high quality clinical guideline development and implementation. Guideline-based performance measures are a key implementation tool and are widely used internationally for quality improvement, quality assurance, and pay for performance in health care. There is, however, no international consensus on best methods for guideline-based performance measures. In order to address this issue, the G-I-N Performance Measures Working Group aimed to develop a set of consensus-based reporting standards for guideline-based performance measure development and re-evaluation.METHODS: Methodology publications on guideline-based performance measures were identified from a systematic literature review and analyzed. Core criteria for the development and evaluation process of guideline-based performance measures were determined and refined into draft standards with an associated rationale and description of the evidence base. In a two-round Delphi-process, the group members appraised and approved the draft standards. After the first round, the group met to discuss comments and revised the drafts accordingly.RESULTS: Twenty-one methodology publications were reviewed. The group reached strong consensus on nine reporting standards concerning: (1) selection of clinical guidelines, (2) extraction of clinical guideline recommendations, (3) description of the measure development process, (4) measure appraisal, (5) measure specification, (6) description of the intended use of the measure, (7) measure testing/validating, (8) measure review/re-evaluation, and (9) composition of the measure development panel.CONCLUSIONS: These proposed international reporting standards address core components of guideline-based performance measure development and re-evaluation. They are intended to contribute to international reporting harmonization and improvement of methods for performance measures. Further research is required regarding validity, acceptability, and practicality.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) aims to promote high quality clinical guideline development and implementation. Guideline-based performance measures are a key implementation tool and are widely used internationally for quality improvement, quality assurance, and pay for performance in health care. There is, however, no international consensus on best methods for guideline-based performance measures. In order to address this issue, the G-I-N Performance Measures Working Group aimed to develop a set of consensus-based reporting standards for guideline-based performance measure development and re-evaluation.METHODS: Methodology publications on guideline-based performance measures were identified from a systematic literature review and analyzed. Core criteria for the development and evaluation process of guideline-based performance measures were determined and refined into draft standards with an associated rationale and description of the evidence base. In a two-round Delphi-process, the group members appraised and approved the draft standards. After the first round, the group met to discuss comments and revised the drafts accordingly.RESULTS: Twenty-one methodology publications were reviewed. The group reached strong consensus on nine reporting standards concerning: (1) selection of clinical guidelines, (2) extraction of clinical guideline recommendations, (3) description of the measure development process, (4) measure appraisal, (5) measure specification, (6) description of the intended use of the measure, (7) measure testing/validating, (8) measure review/re-evaluation, and (9) composition of the measure development panel.CONCLUSIONS: These proposed international reporting standards address core components of guideline-based performance measure development and re-evaluation. They are intended to contribute to international reporting harmonization and improvement of methods for performance measures. Further research is required regarding validity, acceptability, and practicality.

KW - Delivery of Health Care

KW - Humans

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Professional Competence

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z

DO - 10.1186/s13012-015-0369-z

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26772173

VL - 11

SP - 6

JO - IMPLEMENT SCI

JF - IMPLEMENT SCI

SN - 1748-5908

ER -