PortalPublikationenReliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch ...

Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population

Standard

Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population. / Scholz, Timo; Zech, Astrid; Wegscheider, Karl; Lezius, Susanne; Braumann, Klaus-Michael; Sehner, Susanne; Hollander, Karsten.

in: J AM PODIAT MED ASSN, Jahrgang 107, Nr. 5, 09.2017, S. 419-427.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Scholz, T, Zech, A, Wegscheider, K, Lezius, S, Braumann, K-M, Sehner, S & Hollander, K 2017, 'Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population', J AM PODIAT MED ASSN, Jg. 107, Nr. 5, S. 419-427. https://doi.org/10.7547/16-133

APA

Scholz, T., Zech, A., Wegscheider, K., Lezius, S., Braumann, K-M., Sehner, S., & Hollander, K. (2017). Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population. J AM PODIAT MED ASSN, 107(5), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.7547/16-133

Vancouver

Scholz T, Zech A, Wegscheider K, Lezius S, Braumann K-M, Sehner S et al. Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population. J AM PODIAT MED ASSN. 2017 Sep;107(5):419-427. https://doi.org/10.7547/16-133

Bibtex

@article{45b8db332f6a42d5a4eb80f7caef3260,
title = "Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Measurement of the medial longitudinal foot arch in children is a controversial topic, as there are many different methods without a definite standard procedure. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate intraday and interrater reliability regarding dynamic arch index and static arch height, 2) explore the correlation between both arch indices, and 3) examine the variation of the medial longitudinal arch at two different times of the day.METHODS: Eighty-six children (mean ± SD age, 8.9 ± 1.9 years) participated in the study. Dynamic footprint data were captured with a pedobarographic platform. For static arch measurements, a specially constructed caliper was used to assess heel-to-toe length and dorsum height. A mixed model was established to determine reliability and variation.RESULTS: Reliability was found to be excellent for the static arch height index in sitting (intraday, 0.90; interrater, 0.80) and standing positions (0.88 and 0.85) and for the dynamic arch index (both 1.00). There was poor correlation between static and dynamic assessment of the medial longitudinal arch (standing dynamic arch index, r = -0.138; sitting dynamic arch index, r = -0.070). Static measurements were found to be significantly influenced by the time of day (P < .001), whereas the dynamic arch index was unchanged (P = .845). This study revealed some further important findings. The static arch height index is influenced by gender (P = .004), whereas dynamic arch index is influenced by side (P = .011) and body mass index (P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic and static foot measurements are reliable for medial longitudinal foot arch assessment in children. The variation of static arch measurements during the day has to be kept in mind. For clinical purposes, static and dynamic arch data should be interpreted separately.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Timo Scholz and Astrid Zech and Karl Wegscheider and Susanne Lezius and Klaus-Michael Braumann and Susanne Sehner and Karsten Hollander",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
doi = "10.7547/16-133",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "419--427",
journal = "J AM PODIAT MED ASSN",
issn = "8750-7315",
publisher = "American Podiatric Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population

AU - Scholz, Timo

AU - Zech, Astrid

AU - Wegscheider, Karl

AU - Lezius, Susanne

AU - Braumann, Klaus-Michael

AU - Sehner, Susanne

AU - Hollander, Karsten

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: Measurement of the medial longitudinal foot arch in children is a controversial topic, as there are many different methods without a definite standard procedure. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate intraday and interrater reliability regarding dynamic arch index and static arch height, 2) explore the correlation between both arch indices, and 3) examine the variation of the medial longitudinal arch at two different times of the day.METHODS: Eighty-six children (mean ± SD age, 8.9 ± 1.9 years) participated in the study. Dynamic footprint data were captured with a pedobarographic platform. For static arch measurements, a specially constructed caliper was used to assess heel-to-toe length and dorsum height. A mixed model was established to determine reliability and variation.RESULTS: Reliability was found to be excellent for the static arch height index in sitting (intraday, 0.90; interrater, 0.80) and standing positions (0.88 and 0.85) and for the dynamic arch index (both 1.00). There was poor correlation between static and dynamic assessment of the medial longitudinal arch (standing dynamic arch index, r = -0.138; sitting dynamic arch index, r = -0.070). Static measurements were found to be significantly influenced by the time of day (P < .001), whereas the dynamic arch index was unchanged (P = .845). This study revealed some further important findings. The static arch height index is influenced by gender (P = .004), whereas dynamic arch index is influenced by side (P = .011) and body mass index (P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic and static foot measurements are reliable for medial longitudinal foot arch assessment in children. The variation of static arch measurements during the day has to be kept in mind. For clinical purposes, static and dynamic arch data should be interpreted separately.

AB - BACKGROUND: Measurement of the medial longitudinal foot arch in children is a controversial topic, as there are many different methods without a definite standard procedure. The purpose of this study was to 1) investigate intraday and interrater reliability regarding dynamic arch index and static arch height, 2) explore the correlation between both arch indices, and 3) examine the variation of the medial longitudinal arch at two different times of the day.METHODS: Eighty-six children (mean ± SD age, 8.9 ± 1.9 years) participated in the study. Dynamic footprint data were captured with a pedobarographic platform. For static arch measurements, a specially constructed caliper was used to assess heel-to-toe length and dorsum height. A mixed model was established to determine reliability and variation.RESULTS: Reliability was found to be excellent for the static arch height index in sitting (intraday, 0.90; interrater, 0.80) and standing positions (0.88 and 0.85) and for the dynamic arch index (both 1.00). There was poor correlation between static and dynamic assessment of the medial longitudinal arch (standing dynamic arch index, r = -0.138; sitting dynamic arch index, r = -0.070). Static measurements were found to be significantly influenced by the time of day (P < .001), whereas the dynamic arch index was unchanged (P = .845). This study revealed some further important findings. The static arch height index is influenced by gender (P = .004), whereas dynamic arch index is influenced by side (P = .011) and body mass index (P < .001).CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic and static foot measurements are reliable for medial longitudinal foot arch assessment in children. The variation of static arch measurements during the day has to be kept in mind. For clinical purposes, static and dynamic arch data should be interpreted separately.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.7547/16-133

DO - 10.7547/16-133

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28708428

VL - 107

SP - 419

EP - 427

JO - J AM PODIAT MED ASSN

JF - J AM PODIAT MED ASSN

SN - 8750-7315

IS - 5

ER -