PortalPublikationenRefraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilität von 3-teiligen vs...

Refraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilität von 3-teiligen vs. 1-teiligen Intraokularlinsen bei hoher Achsenmyopie

Standard

Refraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilität von 3-teiligen vs. 1-teiligen Intraokularlinsen bei hoher Achsenmyopie. / Frings, A; Steinbrugger, I; Wissiak, E; Vidic, B; El-Shabrawi, Y; Ardjomand, N.

in: OPHTHALMOLOGE, Jahrgang 109, Nr. 6, 01.06.2012, S. 591-4.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Frings, A, Steinbrugger, I, Wissiak, E, Vidic, B, El-Shabrawi, Y & Ardjomand, N 2012, 'Refraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilität von 3-teiligen vs. 1-teiligen Intraokularlinsen bei hoher Achsenmyopie', OPHTHALMOLOGE, Jg. 109, Nr. 6, S. 591-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-012-2556-5

APA

Frings, A., Steinbrugger, I., Wissiak, E., Vidic, B., El-Shabrawi, Y., & Ardjomand, N. (2012). Refraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilität von 3-teiligen vs. 1-teiligen Intraokularlinsen bei hoher Achsenmyopie. OPHTHALMOLOGE, 109(6), 591-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-012-2556-5

Vancouver

Frings A, Steinbrugger I, Wissiak E, Vidic B, El-Shabrawi Y, Ardjomand N. Refraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilität von 3-teiligen vs. 1-teiligen Intraokularlinsen bei hoher Achsenmyopie. OPHTHALMOLOGE. 2012 Jun 1;109(6):591-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-012-2556-5

Bibtex

@article{54936383b051475c8b59d0b605c193af,
title = "Refraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilit{\"a}t von 3-teiligen vs. 1-teiligen Intraokularlinsen bei hoher Achsenmyopie",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Based on previous data on single-piece and three-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) there is no evidence for significant differences in decentration, tilt and refractive shift. The purpose of the current study was to compare single-piece and three-piece IOLs in patients with high axial myopia.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 eyes of 50 patients with high axial myopia (axis length ≥ 28.00 mm) with and without cataract who underwent complication-free phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were retrospectively examined. To compare single-piece and three-piece IOLs, the patients were retrospectively grouped depending on IOL type: group 1 acrylic single-piece IOL (n = 37; ACR6D SE, Corneal, France) and group 2 acrylic three-piece IOL with fixed haptic frame (n = 31; AF-1 UY, Hoya, Japan). Patient files were analyzed regarding best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive predictability and stability.RESULTS: In this study the mean BSCVA was determined as 0.22 ± 0.12 logMAR and 0.13 ± 0.11 logMAR 6 months postoperatively for the ACR6D SE group and the AF-1 UV group, respectively (p = 0.09). Refractive predictability was less accurate in the ACR6D SE (+ 1.75 ± 2.2 dpt) compared to the AF-1 UV (- 0.37 ± 1.1) treated eyes (p = 0.001). Refractive stability, defined as the difference in diopters between the first week and the sixth month after surgery, resulted in  + 0.40 ± 1.7 dpt and -0.16 ± 1.2 dpt for the ACR6D SE and the AF-1 UV, respectively (p = 0.022).CONCLUSIONS: The three-piece AF-1 UV showed satisfactory refractive predictability and stability in patients with high axial myopia. The ACR6D SE has a high refractive unpredictability and should not be used in eyes with high axial myopia.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Middle Aged, Myopia, Prosthesis Design, Refractive Errors, Treatment Outcome, Visual Acuity",
author = "A Frings and I Steinbrugger and E Wissiak and B Vidic and Y El-Shabrawi and N Ardjomand",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00347-012-2556-5",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "109",
pages = "591--4",
journal = "OPHTHALMOLOGE",
issn = "0941-293X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refraktive Vorhersagbarkeit und Stabilität von 3-teiligen vs. 1-teiligen Intraokularlinsen bei hoher Achsenmyopie

AU - Frings, A

AU - Steinbrugger, I

AU - Wissiak, E

AU - Vidic, B

AU - El-Shabrawi, Y

AU - Ardjomand, N

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Based on previous data on single-piece and three-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) there is no evidence for significant differences in decentration, tilt and refractive shift. The purpose of the current study was to compare single-piece and three-piece IOLs in patients with high axial myopia.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 eyes of 50 patients with high axial myopia (axis length ≥ 28.00 mm) with and without cataract who underwent complication-free phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were retrospectively examined. To compare single-piece and three-piece IOLs, the patients were retrospectively grouped depending on IOL type: group 1 acrylic single-piece IOL (n = 37; ACR6D SE, Corneal, France) and group 2 acrylic three-piece IOL with fixed haptic frame (n = 31; AF-1 UY, Hoya, Japan). Patient files were analyzed regarding best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive predictability and stability.RESULTS: In this study the mean BSCVA was determined as 0.22 ± 0.12 logMAR and 0.13 ± 0.11 logMAR 6 months postoperatively for the ACR6D SE group and the AF-1 UV group, respectively (p = 0.09). Refractive predictability was less accurate in the ACR6D SE (+ 1.75 ± 2.2 dpt) compared to the AF-1 UV (- 0.37 ± 1.1) treated eyes (p = 0.001). Refractive stability, defined as the difference in diopters between the first week and the sixth month after surgery, resulted in  + 0.40 ± 1.7 dpt and -0.16 ± 1.2 dpt for the ACR6D SE and the AF-1 UV, respectively (p = 0.022).CONCLUSIONS: The three-piece AF-1 UV showed satisfactory refractive predictability and stability in patients with high axial myopia. The ACR6D SE has a high refractive unpredictability and should not be used in eyes with high axial myopia.

AB - BACKGROUND: Based on previous data on single-piece and three-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) there is no evidence for significant differences in decentration, tilt and refractive shift. The purpose of the current study was to compare single-piece and three-piece IOLs in patients with high axial myopia.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 eyes of 50 patients with high axial myopia (axis length ≥ 28.00 mm) with and without cataract who underwent complication-free phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were retrospectively examined. To compare single-piece and three-piece IOLs, the patients were retrospectively grouped depending on IOL type: group 1 acrylic single-piece IOL (n = 37; ACR6D SE, Corneal, France) and group 2 acrylic three-piece IOL with fixed haptic frame (n = 31; AF-1 UY, Hoya, Japan). Patient files were analyzed regarding best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive predictability and stability.RESULTS: In this study the mean BSCVA was determined as 0.22 ± 0.12 logMAR and 0.13 ± 0.11 logMAR 6 months postoperatively for the ACR6D SE group and the AF-1 UV group, respectively (p = 0.09). Refractive predictability was less accurate in the ACR6D SE (+ 1.75 ± 2.2 dpt) compared to the AF-1 UV (- 0.37 ± 1.1) treated eyes (p = 0.001). Refractive stability, defined as the difference in diopters between the first week and the sixth month after surgery, resulted in  + 0.40 ± 1.7 dpt and -0.16 ± 1.2 dpt for the ACR6D SE and the AF-1 UV, respectively (p = 0.022).CONCLUSIONS: The three-piece AF-1 UV showed satisfactory refractive predictability and stability in patients with high axial myopia. The ACR6D SE has a high refractive unpredictability and should not be used in eyes with high axial myopia.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Equipment Failure Analysis

KW - Humans

KW - Lenses, Intraocular

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Myopia

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Refractive Errors

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Visual Acuity

U2 - 10.1007/s00347-012-2556-5

DO - 10.1007/s00347-012-2556-5

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 22547125

VL - 109

SP - 591

EP - 594

JO - OPHTHALMOLOGE

JF - OPHTHALMOLOGE

SN - 0941-293X

IS - 6

ER -