Randomized, phase 2 trial of low-dose cytarabine with or without volasertib in AML patients not suitable for induction therapy

  • Hartmut Döhner
  • Michael Lübbert
  • Walter Fiedler
  • Loic Fouillard
  • Alf Haaland
  • Joseph M Brandwein
  • Stephane Lepretre
  • Oumedaly Reman
  • Pascal Turlure
  • Oliver G Ottmann
  • Carsten Müller-Tidow
  • Alwin Krämer
  • Emmanuel Raffoux
  • Konstanze Döhner
  • Richard F Schlenk
  • Florian Voss
  • Tillmann Taube
  • Holger Fritsch
  • Johan Maertens

Beteiligte Einrichtungen

Abstract

Treatment outcomes for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have remained dismal. This randomized, phase 2 trial in AML patients not considered suitable for intensive induction therapy compared low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with or without volasertib, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of polo-like kinases. Eighty-seven patients (median age 75 years) received LDAC 20 mg twice daily subcutaneously days 1-10 or LDAC + volasertib 350 mg IV days 1 + 15 every 4 weeks. Response rate (complete remission and complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery) was higher for LDAC + volasertib vs LDAC (31.0% vs 13.3%; odds ratio, 2.91; P = .052). Responses in the LDAC + volasertib arm were observed across all genetic groups, including 5 of 14 patients with adverse cytogenetics. Median event-free survival was significantly prolonged by LDAC + volasertib compared with LDAC (5.6 vs 2.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.92; P = .021); median overall survival was 8.0 vs 5.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.00; P = .047). LDAC + volasertib led to an increased frequency of adverse events that was most pronounced for neutropenic fever/infections and gastrointestinal events; there was no increase in the death rate at days 60 + 90. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00804856.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0006-4971
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 28.08.2014
PubMed 25006120