Radiological Evaluation Criteria for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: Review of the Literature

Standard

Radiological Evaluation Criteria for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: Review of the Literature. / Bechstein, Matthias; McDonough, Rosalie; Fiehler, Jens; Zanolini, Umberto; Rai, Hamid; Siddiqui, Adnan; Shotar, Eimad; Rouchaud, Aymeric; Goyal, Mayank; Gellissen, Susanne.

in: CLIN NEURORADIOL, Jahrgang 32, Nr. 4, 12.2022, S. 923-929.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e5a94e4d69ad4db59b8c45bc881411bd,
title = "Radiological Evaluation Criteria for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: Review of the Literature",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The methodology of measuring chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) extent and its effect on intracranial structures is relevant for patient classification and outcome measurements and affects the external validity of cSDH studies. With embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) as a possible treatment of cSDHs, the topic has gained substantial interest. We sought to summarize the heterogeneity of radiologic measurements, specifically in the evaluation of cSDHs based on literature review.METHODS: In this review, we identified and described the most common radiological methodologies for measurements of cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and of midline shift.CONCLUSION: There are numerous published methods on how to evaluate cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and midline shift but no common standard. The definition of measurement methods and reporting standards for MMA embolization in cSDH patients and their validation needs to be addressed.",
keywords = "Humans, Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/diagnostic imaging, Meningeal Arteries, Embolization, Therapeutic/methods, Radiography, Tomography, X-Ray Computed",
author = "Matthias Bechstein and Rosalie McDonough and Jens Fiehler and Umberto Zanolini and Hamid Rai and Adnan Siddiqui and Eimad Shotar and Aymeric Rouchaud and Mayank Goyal and Susanne Gellissen",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2022. The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s00062-022-01138-1",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "923--929",
journal = "CLIN NEURORADIOL",
issn = "1869-1439",
publisher = "Springer Heidelberg",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiological Evaluation Criteria for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: Review of the Literature

AU - Bechstein, Matthias

AU - McDonough, Rosalie

AU - Fiehler, Jens

AU - Zanolini, Umberto

AU - Rai, Hamid

AU - Siddiqui, Adnan

AU - Shotar, Eimad

AU - Rouchaud, Aymeric

AU - Goyal, Mayank

AU - Gellissen, Susanne

N1 - © 2022. The Author(s).

PY - 2022/12

Y1 - 2022/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: The methodology of measuring chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) extent and its effect on intracranial structures is relevant for patient classification and outcome measurements and affects the external validity of cSDH studies. With embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) as a possible treatment of cSDHs, the topic has gained substantial interest. We sought to summarize the heterogeneity of radiologic measurements, specifically in the evaluation of cSDHs based on literature review.METHODS: In this review, we identified and described the most common radiological methodologies for measurements of cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and of midline shift.CONCLUSION: There are numerous published methods on how to evaluate cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and midline shift but no common standard. The definition of measurement methods and reporting standards for MMA embolization in cSDH patients and their validation needs to be addressed.

AB - BACKGROUND: The methodology of measuring chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) extent and its effect on intracranial structures is relevant for patient classification and outcome measurements and affects the external validity of cSDH studies. With embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) as a possible treatment of cSDHs, the topic has gained substantial interest. We sought to summarize the heterogeneity of radiologic measurements, specifically in the evaluation of cSDHs based on literature review.METHODS: In this review, we identified and described the most common radiological methodologies for measurements of cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and of midline shift.CONCLUSION: There are numerous published methods on how to evaluate cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and midline shift but no common standard. The definition of measurement methods and reporting standards for MMA embolization in cSDH patients and their validation needs to be addressed.

KW - Humans

KW - Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic/diagnostic imaging

KW - Meningeal Arteries

KW - Embolization, Therapeutic/methods

KW - Radiography

KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed

U2 - 10.1007/s00062-022-01138-1

DO - 10.1007/s00062-022-01138-1

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 35157088

VL - 32

SP - 923

EP - 929

JO - CLIN NEURORADIOL

JF - CLIN NEURORADIOL

SN - 1869-1439

IS - 4

ER -