Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality-of-life evaluation in chronic wounds: comparative analysis of three disease-specific questionnaires

AU - Augustin, Matthias

AU - Baade, Katrin

AU - Heyer, Kristina

AU - Price, Patricia E

AU - Herberger, Katharina

AU - Wild, Thomas

AU - Engelhardt, Michael

AU - Debus, Eike S

N1 - © 2017 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - The study directly compared the feasibility and performance of three instruments measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic ulcers: the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for wounds (FLQA-w), the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS) and the Würzburg Wound Score (WWS). The questionnaires were evaluated in a randomly assigned order in a longitudinal observational study of leg ulcer patients. Psychometric properties (internal consistency, responsiveness and construct validity) were analysed. Patient acceptance was recorded. Analysis of n = 154 patients revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0·85) for all instruments. There were minor floor effects in all questionnaires (<1%) and some ceiling effects in the CWIS. Construct validity was satisfactory, for example, correlation with EuroQoL-5D was r = 0·70 in the FLQA-w, r = 0·47/0·67/0·68 in the CWIS dimensions and r = 0·60 in the WWS. The proportion of missing values was higher in the CWIS, and overall patient acceptance was highest in the FLQA-w for wounds (54% best preferences) and lowest in the WWS (14%). In conclusion, the FLQA-w, the CWIS and the WWS are reliable, sensitive and valid instruments for the assessment of HRQoL in leg ulcers. However, they show differences in clinical feasibility and patient acceptance.

AB - The study directly compared the feasibility and performance of three instruments measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in chronic ulcers: the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for wounds (FLQA-w), the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule (CWIS) and the Würzburg Wound Score (WWS). The questionnaires were evaluated in a randomly assigned order in a longitudinal observational study of leg ulcer patients. Psychometric properties (internal consistency, responsiveness and construct validity) were analysed. Patient acceptance was recorded. Analysis of n = 154 patients revealed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0·85) for all instruments. There were minor floor effects in all questionnaires (<1%) and some ceiling effects in the CWIS. Construct validity was satisfactory, for example, correlation with EuroQoL-5D was r = 0·70 in the FLQA-w, r = 0·47/0·67/0·68 in the CWIS dimensions and r = 0·60 in the WWS. The proportion of missing values was higher in the CWIS, and overall patient acceptance was highest in the FLQA-w for wounds (54% best preferences) and lowest in the WWS (14%). In conclusion, the FLQA-w, the CWIS and the WWS are reliable, sensitive and valid instruments for the assessment of HRQoL in leg ulcers. However, they show differences in clinical feasibility and patient acceptance.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1111/iwj.12803

DO - 10.1111/iwj.12803

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28875518

VL - 14

SP - 1299

EP - 1304

JO - INT WOUND J

JF - INT WOUND J

SN - 1742-4801

IS - 6

ER -