Quality of life as patient-reported outcomes: principles of assessment

Standard

Quality of life as patient-reported outcomes: principles of assessment. / Bullinger-Naber, Monika; Quitmann, Julia.

in: DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 2, 01.06.2014, S. 137-45.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{4e954abd65114a55a1cd152a05f2e30f,
title = "Quality of life as patient-reported outcomes: principles of assessment",
abstract = "Assessing quality of life (QoL) as a patient-reported outcome in adult psychiatry poses challenges in terms of concepts, methods, and applications in research and practice. This review will outline conceptually the construct of QoL, its dimensionality, and its representation across patient groups. Methodological challenges are examined, along with principles of QoL instrument development and testing, as well as across cultures. Application of instruments in epidemiological, clinical health economics, and health services research is reviewed based on pertinent literature. Validated measures for depression, psychosis, and anxiety disorders are available in adult psychiatry, and are increasingly used in research. Still, targeted measures are lacking for many mental health conditions and only rarely are tools applied in the practice context. Progress has been made in the development of instruments that are now ready for implementation. The information to be gained is valuable for identifying patient-reported needs for and benefits of treatment.",
author = "Monika Bullinger-Naber and Julia Quitmann",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "137--45",
journal = "DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO",
issn = "1294-8322",
publisher = "Servier International",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life as patient-reported outcomes: principles of assessment

AU - Bullinger-Naber, Monika

AU - Quitmann, Julia

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - Assessing quality of life (QoL) as a patient-reported outcome in adult psychiatry poses challenges in terms of concepts, methods, and applications in research and practice. This review will outline conceptually the construct of QoL, its dimensionality, and its representation across patient groups. Methodological challenges are examined, along with principles of QoL instrument development and testing, as well as across cultures. Application of instruments in epidemiological, clinical health economics, and health services research is reviewed based on pertinent literature. Validated measures for depression, psychosis, and anxiety disorders are available in adult psychiatry, and are increasingly used in research. Still, targeted measures are lacking for many mental health conditions and only rarely are tools applied in the practice context. Progress has been made in the development of instruments that are now ready for implementation. The information to be gained is valuable for identifying patient-reported needs for and benefits of treatment.

AB - Assessing quality of life (QoL) as a patient-reported outcome in adult psychiatry poses challenges in terms of concepts, methods, and applications in research and practice. This review will outline conceptually the construct of QoL, its dimensionality, and its representation across patient groups. Methodological challenges are examined, along with principles of QoL instrument development and testing, as well as across cultures. Application of instruments in epidemiological, clinical health economics, and health services research is reviewed based on pertinent literature. Validated measures for depression, psychosis, and anxiety disorders are available in adult psychiatry, and are increasingly used in research. Still, targeted measures are lacking for many mental health conditions and only rarely are tools applied in the practice context. Progress has been made in the development of instruments that are now ready for implementation. The information to be gained is valuable for identifying patient-reported needs for and benefits of treatment.

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25152653

VL - 16

SP - 137

EP - 145

JO - DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO

JF - DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO

SN - 1294-8322

IS - 2

ER -