Quality of care for people with multimorbidity: a focus group study with patients and their relatives
Standard
Quality of care for people with multimorbidity: a focus group study with patients and their relatives. / Pohontsch, Nadine Janis; Schulze, Josefine; Hoeflich, Charlotte; Glassen, Katharina; Breckner, Amanda; Szecsenyi, Joachim; Lühmann, Dagmar; Scherer, Martin.
in: BMJ OPEN, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 6, 15.06.2021, S. e047025.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of care for people with multimorbidity: a focus group study with patients and their relatives
AU - Pohontsch, Nadine Janis
AU - Schulze, Josefine
AU - Hoeflich, Charlotte
AU - Glassen, Katharina
AU - Breckner, Amanda
AU - Szecsenyi, Joachim
AU - Lühmann, Dagmar
AU - Scherer, Martin
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2021/6/15
Y1 - 2021/6/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: Prevalence of people with multimorbidity rises. Multimorbidity constitutes a challenge to the healthcare system, and treatment of patients with multimorbidity is prone to high-quality variations. Currently, no set of quality indicators (QIs) exists to assess quality of care, let alone incorporating the patient perspective. We therefore aim to identify aspects of quality of care relevant to the patients' perspective and match them to a literature-based set of QIs.METHODS: We conducted eight focus groups with patients with multimorbidity and three focus groups with patients' relatives using a semistructured guide. Data were analysed using Kuckartz's qualitative content analysis. We derived deductive categories from the literature, added inductive categories (new quality aspects) and translated them into QI.RESULTS: We created four new QIs based on the quality aspects relevant to patients/relatives. Two QIs (patient education/self-management, regular updates of medication plans) were consented by an expert panel, while two others were not (periodical check-ups, general practitioner-coordinated care). Half of the literature-based QIs, for example, assessment of biopsychosocial support needs, were supported by participants' accounts, while more technical domains regarding assessment and treatment regimens were not addressed in the focus groups.CONCLUSION: We show that focus groups with patients and relatives adding relevant aspects in QI development should be incorporated by default in QI development processes and constitute a reasonable addition to traditional QI development. Our QI set constitutes a framework for assessing the quality of care in the German healthcare system. It will facilitate implementation of treatment standards and increase the use of existing guidelines, hereby helping to reduce overuse, underuse and misuse of healthcare resources in the treatment of patients with multimorbidity.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German clinical trials registry (DRKS00015718), Pre-Results.
AB - BACKGROUND: Prevalence of people with multimorbidity rises. Multimorbidity constitutes a challenge to the healthcare system, and treatment of patients with multimorbidity is prone to high-quality variations. Currently, no set of quality indicators (QIs) exists to assess quality of care, let alone incorporating the patient perspective. We therefore aim to identify aspects of quality of care relevant to the patients' perspective and match them to a literature-based set of QIs.METHODS: We conducted eight focus groups with patients with multimorbidity and three focus groups with patients' relatives using a semistructured guide. Data were analysed using Kuckartz's qualitative content analysis. We derived deductive categories from the literature, added inductive categories (new quality aspects) and translated them into QI.RESULTS: We created four new QIs based on the quality aspects relevant to patients/relatives. Two QIs (patient education/self-management, regular updates of medication plans) were consented by an expert panel, while two others were not (periodical check-ups, general practitioner-coordinated care). Half of the literature-based QIs, for example, assessment of biopsychosocial support needs, were supported by participants' accounts, while more technical domains regarding assessment and treatment regimens were not addressed in the focus groups.CONCLUSION: We show that focus groups with patients and relatives adding relevant aspects in QI development should be incorporated by default in QI development processes and constitute a reasonable addition to traditional QI development. Our QI set constitutes a framework for assessing the quality of care in the German healthcare system. It will facilitate implementation of treatment standards and increase the use of existing guidelines, hereby helping to reduce overuse, underuse and misuse of healthcare resources in the treatment of patients with multimorbidity.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German clinical trials registry (DRKS00015718), Pre-Results.
KW - Clinical Protocols
KW - Delivery of Health Care
KW - Focus Groups
KW - Humans
KW - Multimorbidity
KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care
UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047025
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047025
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047025
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 34130962
VL - 11
SP - e047025
JO - BMJ OPEN
JF - BMJ OPEN
SN - 2044-6055
IS - 6
ER -