[Public access defibrillation. Limited use by trained first responders and laymen]

Standard

[Public access defibrillation. Limited use by trained first responders and laymen]. / Maisch, Stefan; Friederich, Patrick; Goetz, Alwin E.

in: ANAESTHESIST, Jahrgang 55, Nr. 12, 12, 2006, S. 1281-1290.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Maisch S, Friederich P, Goetz AE. [Public access defibrillation. Limited use by trained first responders and laymen]. ANAESTHESIST. 2006;55(12):1281-1290. 12.

Bibtex

@article{40dd87e3a30d4feb87cce6c6848f4c14,
title = "[Public access defibrillation. Limited use by trained first responders and laymen]",
abstract = "As ventricular fibrillation is the most frequent initial heart rhythm causing out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest, defibrillation is of essential significance. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have been available for some years and as a result defibrillation can be carried out by individuals other than physicians and healthcare providers such as trained first responders and untrained lay rescuers. This so-called public access defibrillation nourished hope of progress in the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest. However, several limitations exist, such as low frequency of sudden cardiac arrest in public, rare use of publicly placed AEDs, low cost effectiveness, legal requirements and insufficient public willingness to help. Due to these restrictions of public access defibrillation other measures are more promising than the attempt at general distribution of AEDs. These measures are primary or secondary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac arrest, general knowledge of adequate activation of emergency medical services, implementation of first responder teams equipped with AEDs and particularly a better education in and application of the well-established principles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.",
author = "Stefan Maisch and Patrick Friederich and Goetz, {Alwin E.}",
year = "2006",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "55",
pages = "1281--1290",
journal = "ANAESTHESIST",
issn = "0003-2417",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Public access defibrillation. Limited use by trained first responders and laymen]

AU - Maisch, Stefan

AU - Friederich, Patrick

AU - Goetz, Alwin E.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - As ventricular fibrillation is the most frequent initial heart rhythm causing out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest, defibrillation is of essential significance. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have been available for some years and as a result defibrillation can be carried out by individuals other than physicians and healthcare providers such as trained first responders and untrained lay rescuers. This so-called public access defibrillation nourished hope of progress in the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest. However, several limitations exist, such as low frequency of sudden cardiac arrest in public, rare use of publicly placed AEDs, low cost effectiveness, legal requirements and insufficient public willingness to help. Due to these restrictions of public access defibrillation other measures are more promising than the attempt at general distribution of AEDs. These measures are primary or secondary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac arrest, general knowledge of adequate activation of emergency medical services, implementation of first responder teams equipped with AEDs and particularly a better education in and application of the well-established principles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

AB - As ventricular fibrillation is the most frequent initial heart rhythm causing out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest, defibrillation is of essential significance. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have been available for some years and as a result defibrillation can be carried out by individuals other than physicians and healthcare providers such as trained first responders and untrained lay rescuers. This so-called public access defibrillation nourished hope of progress in the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest. However, several limitations exist, such as low frequency of sudden cardiac arrest in public, rare use of publicly placed AEDs, low cost effectiveness, legal requirements and insufficient public willingness to help. Due to these restrictions of public access defibrillation other measures are more promising than the attempt at general distribution of AEDs. These measures are primary or secondary prophylaxis of sudden cardiac arrest, general knowledge of adequate activation of emergency medical services, implementation of first responder teams equipped with AEDs and particularly a better education in and application of the well-established principles of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 55

SP - 1281

EP - 1290

JO - ANAESTHESIST

JF - ANAESTHESIST

SN - 0003-2417

IS - 12

M1 - 12

ER -