Psychometric analysis of the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a representative German sample

Standard

Psychometric analysis of the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a representative German sample. / Franke, Gabriele Helga; Jaeger, Susanne; Glaesmer, Heide; Barkmann, Claus; Petrowski, Katja; Braehler, Elmar.

in: BMC MED RES METHODOL, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 1, 26.01.2017, S. 14.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5edc3ee1723d4dcaabd7278cbbdada5b,
title = "Psychometric analysis of the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a representative German sample",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The BSI-18 contains the three six-item scales somatization, depression, and anxiety as well as the Global Severity Index (GSI), including all 18 items. The BSI-18 is the latest and shortest of the multidimensional versions of the Symptom-Checklist 90-R, but its psychometric properties have not been sufficiently clarified yet.METHODS: Based on a representative sample of N = 2516 participants (aged 14-94 years), detailed psychometric analyses were carried out.RESULTS: The internal consistency was good: Somatization α = .82, Depression α = .87, Anxiety α = .84 and GSI α = .93. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three scales as second-order and GSI as first-order factors. The model fit based on RMSEA is good but that model fit based on CFI and TLI are too low.CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, it is a very short, reliable instrument for the assessment of psychological distress. The BSI-18 can be used to reliably assess psychological distress in the general population. However, further studies need to evaluate the usefulness of standardization in clinical samples.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Franke, {Gabriele Helga} and Susanne Jaeger and Heide Glaesmer and Claus Barkmann and Katja Petrowski and Elmar Braehler",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1186/s12874-016-0283-3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "14",
journal = "BMC MED RES METHODOL",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric analysis of the brief symptom inventory 18 (BSI-18) in a representative German sample

AU - Franke, Gabriele Helga

AU - Jaeger, Susanne

AU - Glaesmer, Heide

AU - Barkmann, Claus

AU - Petrowski, Katja

AU - Braehler, Elmar

PY - 2017/1/26

Y1 - 2017/1/26

N2 - BACKGROUND: The BSI-18 contains the three six-item scales somatization, depression, and anxiety as well as the Global Severity Index (GSI), including all 18 items. The BSI-18 is the latest and shortest of the multidimensional versions of the Symptom-Checklist 90-R, but its psychometric properties have not been sufficiently clarified yet.METHODS: Based on a representative sample of N = 2516 participants (aged 14-94 years), detailed psychometric analyses were carried out.RESULTS: The internal consistency was good: Somatization α = .82, Depression α = .87, Anxiety α = .84 and GSI α = .93. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three scales as second-order and GSI as first-order factors. The model fit based on RMSEA is good but that model fit based on CFI and TLI are too low.CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, it is a very short, reliable instrument for the assessment of psychological distress. The BSI-18 can be used to reliably assess psychological distress in the general population. However, further studies need to evaluate the usefulness of standardization in clinical samples.

AB - BACKGROUND: The BSI-18 contains the three six-item scales somatization, depression, and anxiety as well as the Global Severity Index (GSI), including all 18 items. The BSI-18 is the latest and shortest of the multidimensional versions of the Symptom-Checklist 90-R, but its psychometric properties have not been sufficiently clarified yet.METHODS: Based on a representative sample of N = 2516 participants (aged 14-94 years), detailed psychometric analyses were carried out.RESULTS: The internal consistency was good: Somatization α = .82, Depression α = .87, Anxiety α = .84 and GSI α = .93. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the three scales as second-order and GSI as first-order factors. The model fit based on RMSEA is good but that model fit based on CFI and TLI are too low.CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, it is a very short, reliable instrument for the assessment of psychological distress. The BSI-18 can be used to reliably assess psychological distress in the general population. However, further studies need to evaluate the usefulness of standardization in clinical samples.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1186/s12874-016-0283-3

DO - 10.1186/s12874-016-0283-3

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28125960

VL - 17

SP - 14

JO - BMC MED RES METHODOL

JF - BMC MED RES METHODOL

SN - 1471-2288

IS - 1

ER -