Prospective validation of current quantitative electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Standard

Prospective validation of current quantitative electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. / APACE Investigators.

in: INT J CARDIOL, Jahrgang 292, 01.10.2019, S. 1-12.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3145d7e586e54b1ebe8a39f30d4c0d09,
title = "Prospective validation of current quantitative electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Rapid and reliable diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as a surrogate for acute coronary occlusion is critical for early reperfusion therapy.OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of current guideline-recommended Electrocardiogram (ECG) STEMI criteria.METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic multicenter study, we objectively quantified the extent of ST-segment elevation in all ECG leads using an automated software-based analysis of the digital 12-lead-ECG in adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected myocardial infarction (MI). Classification according to current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI at ED presentation was compared against a final diagnosis adjudicated by two independent cardiologists after reviewing all available medical records including serial ECGs, cardiac imaging and coronary angiograms.RESULTS: Among 2486 patients, 52 (2%) were found to have significant ST-segment elevation on ECG at ED presentation according to current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI. Eighty-one (3%) patients received a final adjudicated diagnosis of STEMI. Only 35% (28 of 81) of all patients with a final diagnosis of STEMI were correctly identified (PPV 54% (95% CI 41-66%), sensitivity 35% (95% Cl 24-46%), NPV 97.8% (95% CI 97.5-98.1%). Four reasons for missing STEMIs emerged: timing (significant STE at an earlier/later time point) in 25%, incorrect measurement points in 30%, non or borderline-significant STE in 36% and inferoposterior MI localisation in 9%.CONCLUSIONS: A computerized analysis of current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI showed suboptimal diagnostic performance when applied to a single 12‑lead ECG performed at ED presentation.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis",
author = "Petra Hillinger and Ivo Strebel and Roger Ab{\"a}cherli and Raphael Twerenbold and Karin Wildi and Denise Bernhard and Thomas Nestelberger and Jasper Boeddinghaus and Patrick Badertscher and Desiree Wussler and Luca Koechlin and Tobias Zimmermann and Christian Puelacher and {Rubini Gimenez}, Maria and {du Fay de Lavallaz}, Jeanne and Joan Walter and Nicolas Geigy and Keller, {Dagmar I} and Tobias Reichlin and Christian Mueller and {APACE Investigators}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.041",
language = "English",
volume = "292",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "INT J CARDIOL",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective validation of current quantitative electrocardiographic criteria for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

AU - Hillinger, Petra

AU - Strebel, Ivo

AU - Abächerli, Roger

AU - Twerenbold, Raphael

AU - Wildi, Karin

AU - Bernhard, Denise

AU - Nestelberger, Thomas

AU - Boeddinghaus, Jasper

AU - Badertscher, Patrick

AU - Wussler, Desiree

AU - Koechlin, Luca

AU - Zimmermann, Tobias

AU - Puelacher, Christian

AU - Rubini Gimenez, Maria

AU - du Fay de Lavallaz, Jeanne

AU - Walter, Joan

AU - Geigy, Nicolas

AU - Keller, Dagmar I

AU - Reichlin, Tobias

AU - Mueller, Christian

AU - APACE Investigators

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Rapid and reliable diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as a surrogate for acute coronary occlusion is critical for early reperfusion therapy.OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of current guideline-recommended Electrocardiogram (ECG) STEMI criteria.METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic multicenter study, we objectively quantified the extent of ST-segment elevation in all ECG leads using an automated software-based analysis of the digital 12-lead-ECG in adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected myocardial infarction (MI). Classification according to current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI at ED presentation was compared against a final diagnosis adjudicated by two independent cardiologists after reviewing all available medical records including serial ECGs, cardiac imaging and coronary angiograms.RESULTS: Among 2486 patients, 52 (2%) were found to have significant ST-segment elevation on ECG at ED presentation according to current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI. Eighty-one (3%) patients received a final adjudicated diagnosis of STEMI. Only 35% (28 of 81) of all patients with a final diagnosis of STEMI were correctly identified (PPV 54% (95% CI 41-66%), sensitivity 35% (95% Cl 24-46%), NPV 97.8% (95% CI 97.5-98.1%). Four reasons for missing STEMIs emerged: timing (significant STE at an earlier/later time point) in 25%, incorrect measurement points in 30%, non or borderline-significant STE in 36% and inferoposterior MI localisation in 9%.CONCLUSIONS: A computerized analysis of current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI showed suboptimal diagnostic performance when applied to a single 12‑lead ECG performed at ED presentation.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587.

AB - BACKGROUND: Rapid and reliable diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as a surrogate for acute coronary occlusion is critical for early reperfusion therapy.OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of current guideline-recommended Electrocardiogram (ECG) STEMI criteria.METHODS: In a prospective diagnostic multicenter study, we objectively quantified the extent of ST-segment elevation in all ECG leads using an automated software-based analysis of the digital 12-lead-ECG in adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected myocardial infarction (MI). Classification according to current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI at ED presentation was compared against a final diagnosis adjudicated by two independent cardiologists after reviewing all available medical records including serial ECGs, cardiac imaging and coronary angiograms.RESULTS: Among 2486 patients, 52 (2%) were found to have significant ST-segment elevation on ECG at ED presentation according to current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI. Eighty-one (3%) patients received a final adjudicated diagnosis of STEMI. Only 35% (28 of 81) of all patients with a final diagnosis of STEMI were correctly identified (PPV 54% (95% CI 41-66%), sensitivity 35% (95% Cl 24-46%), NPV 97.8% (95% CI 97.5-98.1%). Four reasons for missing STEMIs emerged: timing (significant STE at an earlier/later time point) in 25%, incorrect measurement points in 30%, non or borderline-significant STE in 36% and inferoposterior MI localisation in 9%.CONCLUSIONS: A computerized analysis of current guideline-recommended ECG criteria for STEMI showed suboptimal diagnostic performance when applied to a single 12‑lead ECG performed at ED presentation.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00470587.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Electrocardiography

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.041

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.041

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31056411

VL - 292

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - INT J CARDIOL

JF - INT J CARDIOL

SN - 0167-5273

ER -