Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.

Standard

Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. / Rettenberger, Martin; Matthes, Anna; Boer, Douglas P; Eher, Reinhard.

in: INT J OFFENDER THER, Jahrgang 54, Nr. 2, 2, 2010, S. 169-186.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c94ba4a8d86a4d298348299b840b3a9a,
title = "Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.",
abstract = "This study examines the predictive validity of the most commonly used risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders: Static-99, Rapid Risk Assessment for Sexual Offense Recidivism, Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide, Sexual Violence Risk-20, and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in a prospective research design. Although risk assessment is part of a regime leading to various efforts to reduce risk by treatment and aftercare, all instruments show good predictive validity. However, depending on the instrument, recidivism category, and subgroup, the predictive accuracy varies markedly. Furthermore, the authors fail to demonstrate predictive validity for sexual violent reoffences-for the whole sample and for all subgroups. The results, nevertheless, support the utility and predictive validity of actuarial risk assessment complementary to treatment efforts to reduce risk. On the other hand, forensic practitioners have to be aware of the limitations of actuarial risk assessment methods, in particular as regards to variable predictive accuracy for different sexual offender subgroups and reoffence categories.",
author = "Martin Rettenberger and Anna Matthes and Boer, {Douglas P} and Reinhard Eher",
year = "2010",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "54",
pages = "169--186",
journal = "INT J OFFENDER THER",
issn = "0306-624X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.

AU - Rettenberger, Martin

AU - Matthes, Anna

AU - Boer, Douglas P

AU - Eher, Reinhard

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This study examines the predictive validity of the most commonly used risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders: Static-99, Rapid Risk Assessment for Sexual Offense Recidivism, Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide, Sexual Violence Risk-20, and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in a prospective research design. Although risk assessment is part of a regime leading to various efforts to reduce risk by treatment and aftercare, all instruments show good predictive validity. However, depending on the instrument, recidivism category, and subgroup, the predictive accuracy varies markedly. Furthermore, the authors fail to demonstrate predictive validity for sexual violent reoffences-for the whole sample and for all subgroups. The results, nevertheless, support the utility and predictive validity of actuarial risk assessment complementary to treatment efforts to reduce risk. On the other hand, forensic practitioners have to be aware of the limitations of actuarial risk assessment methods, in particular as regards to variable predictive accuracy for different sexual offender subgroups and reoffence categories.

AB - This study examines the predictive validity of the most commonly used risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders: Static-99, Rapid Risk Assessment for Sexual Offense Recidivism, Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide, Sexual Violence Risk-20, and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in a prospective research design. Although risk assessment is part of a regime leading to various efforts to reduce risk by treatment and aftercare, all instruments show good predictive validity. However, depending on the instrument, recidivism category, and subgroup, the predictive accuracy varies markedly. Furthermore, the authors fail to demonstrate predictive validity for sexual violent reoffences-for the whole sample and for all subgroups. The results, nevertheless, support the utility and predictive validity of actuarial risk assessment complementary to treatment efforts to reduce risk. On the other hand, forensic practitioners have to be aware of the limitations of actuarial risk assessment methods, in particular as regards to variable predictive accuracy for different sexual offender subgroups and reoffence categories.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 54

SP - 169

EP - 186

JO - INT J OFFENDER THER

JF - INT J OFFENDER THER

SN - 0306-624X

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -