Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists for patients undergoing catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
Standard
Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists for patients undergoing catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia. / Servatius, Helge; Höfeler, Thormen; Hoffmann, Boris A; Sultan, Arian; Lüker, Jakob; Schäffer, Benjamin; Willems, Stephan; Steven, Daniel.
in: EUROPACE, Jahrgang 18, Nr. 8, 08.2016, S. 1245-1251.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists for patients undergoing catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia
AU - Servatius, Helge
AU - Höfeler, Thormen
AU - Hoffmann, Boris A
AU - Sultan, Arian
AU - Lüker, Jakob
AU - Schäffer, Benjamin
AU - Willems, Stephan
AU - Steven, Daniel
N1 - Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - AIMS: Propofol sedation has been shown to be safe for atrial fibrillation ablation and internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation but its use for catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has yet to be evaluated. Here, we tested the hypothesis that VT ablation can be performed using propofol sedation administered by trained nurses under a cardiologist's supervision.METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 205 procedures (157 patients, 1.3 procedures/patient) undergoing CA for sustained VT under propofol sedation were analysed. The primary endpoint was change of sedation and/or discontinuation of propofol sedation due to side effects and/or haemodynamic instability. Propofol cessation was necessary in 24 of 205 procedures. These procedures (Group A; n = 24, 11.7%) were compared with those with continued propofol sedation (Group B; n = 181, 88.3%). Propofol sedation was discontinued due to hypotension (n = 22; 10.7%), insufficient oxygenation (n = 1, 0.5%), or hypersalivation (n = 1, 0.5%). Procedures in Group A were significantly longer (210 [180-260] vs. 180 [125-220] min, P = 0.005), had a lower per hour propofol rate (3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2 mg/kg of body weight/h, P = 0.004), and higher cumulative dose of fentanyl administered (0.15 [0.13-0.25] vs. 0.1 [0.05-0.13] mg, P < 0.001), compared with patients in Group B. Five (2.4%) adverse events occurred.CONCLUSION: Sedation using propofol can be safely performed for VT ablation under the supervision of cardiologists. Close haemodynamic monitoring is required, especially in elderly patients and during lengthy procedures, which carrying a higher risk for systolic blood pressure decline.
AB - AIMS: Propofol sedation has been shown to be safe for atrial fibrillation ablation and internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation but its use for catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has yet to be evaluated. Here, we tested the hypothesis that VT ablation can be performed using propofol sedation administered by trained nurses under a cardiologist's supervision.METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 205 procedures (157 patients, 1.3 procedures/patient) undergoing CA for sustained VT under propofol sedation were analysed. The primary endpoint was change of sedation and/or discontinuation of propofol sedation due to side effects and/or haemodynamic instability. Propofol cessation was necessary in 24 of 205 procedures. These procedures (Group A; n = 24, 11.7%) were compared with those with continued propofol sedation (Group B; n = 181, 88.3%). Propofol sedation was discontinued due to hypotension (n = 22; 10.7%), insufficient oxygenation (n = 1, 0.5%), or hypersalivation (n = 1, 0.5%). Procedures in Group A were significantly longer (210 [180-260] vs. 180 [125-220] min, P = 0.005), had a lower per hour propofol rate (3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2 mg/kg of body weight/h, P = 0.004), and higher cumulative dose of fentanyl administered (0.15 [0.13-0.25] vs. 0.1 [0.05-0.13] mg, P < 0.001), compared with patients in Group B. Five (2.4%) adverse events occurred.CONCLUSION: Sedation using propofol can be safely performed for VT ablation under the supervision of cardiologists. Close haemodynamic monitoring is required, especially in elderly patients and during lengthy procedures, which carrying a higher risk for systolic blood pressure decline.
KW - Aged
KW - Blood Pressure/drug effects
KW - Cardiologists
KW - Catheter Ablation/methods
KW - Defibrillators, Implantable
KW - Female
KW - Germany
KW - Humans
KW - Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage
KW - Hypotension/chemically induced
KW - Male
KW - Midazolam/therapeutic use
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Propofol/administration & dosage
KW - Tachycardia, Ventricular/therapy
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1093/europace/euv303
DO - 10.1093/europace/euv303
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 27247017
VL - 18
SP - 1245
EP - 1251
JO - EUROPACE
JF - EUROPACE
SN - 1099-5129
IS - 8
ER -