Projection radiography of the clavicle: still recommendable for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals?
Standard
Projection radiography of the clavicle: still recommendable for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals? / Wittschieber, Daniel; Ottow, Christian; Vieth, Volker; Küppers, Martin; Schulz, Ronald; Hassu, Juan; Bajanowski, Thomas; Püschel, Klaus; Ramsthaler, Frank; Pfeiffer, Heidi; Schmidt, Sven; Schmeling, Andreas.
in: INT J LEGAL MED, Jahrgang 129, Nr. 1, 01.01.2015, S. 187-93.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Projection radiography of the clavicle: still recommendable for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals?
AU - Wittschieber, Daniel
AU - Ottow, Christian
AU - Vieth, Volker
AU - Küppers, Martin
AU - Schulz, Ronald
AU - Hassu, Juan
AU - Bajanowski, Thomas
AU - Püschel, Klaus
AU - Ramsthaler, Frank
AU - Pfeiffer, Heidi
AU - Schmidt, Sven
AU - Schmeling, Andreas
PY - 2015/1/1
Y1 - 2015/1/1
N2 - As superimposition effects often impede the evaluation of the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis in standard posterior-anterior (PA) radiographs, additional oblique images (right anterior oblique, RAO, and left anterior oblique, LAO) are currently recommended to allow for reliable stage assessments. The present study examines the influence of the radiographic projection type on stage determination. To this end, 836 sternoclavicular joints were prospectively obtained during forensic autopsies of bodies aged between 15 and 30 years. Subsequently, three different radiographs (PA, RAO, and LAO) were taken from each specimen and separately evaluated as to the developmental stage of the medial clavicular epiphysis. A forensically established five-stage classification system was used. In 25 % of the cases, the medial clavicular epiphysis depicted in an oblique projection showed a different ossification stage than in the PA projection. In at least 10 % of the cases, a higher ossification stage was observed which would have significant disadvantages in criminal proceedings (ethically unacceptable error). In conclusion, the usage of the current radiographic reference data, which rely upon chest radiographs taken as PA projections, appears to be inadmissible for oblique projections. Projection radiography of the clavicle can therefore no longer be recommended for forensic age estimation practice. As to the question of whether an individual has achieved the age of 18 or 21, computed tomography of the clavicle must be regarded as the exclusive method of choice.
AB - As superimposition effects often impede the evaluation of the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis in standard posterior-anterior (PA) radiographs, additional oblique images (right anterior oblique, RAO, and left anterior oblique, LAO) are currently recommended to allow for reliable stage assessments. The present study examines the influence of the radiographic projection type on stage determination. To this end, 836 sternoclavicular joints were prospectively obtained during forensic autopsies of bodies aged between 15 and 30 years. Subsequently, three different radiographs (PA, RAO, and LAO) were taken from each specimen and separately evaluated as to the developmental stage of the medial clavicular epiphysis. A forensically established five-stage classification system was used. In 25 % of the cases, the medial clavicular epiphysis depicted in an oblique projection showed a different ossification stage than in the PA projection. In at least 10 % of the cases, a higher ossification stage was observed which would have significant disadvantages in criminal proceedings (ethically unacceptable error). In conclusion, the usage of the current radiographic reference data, which rely upon chest radiographs taken as PA projections, appears to be inadmissible for oblique projections. Projection radiography of the clavicle can therefore no longer be recommended for forensic age estimation practice. As to the question of whether an individual has achieved the age of 18 or 21, computed tomography of the clavicle must be regarded as the exclusive method of choice.
U2 - 10.1007/s00414-014-1067-0
DO - 10.1007/s00414-014-1067-0
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 25135751
VL - 129
SP - 187
EP - 193
JO - INT J LEGAL MED
JF - INT J LEGAL MED
SN - 0937-9827
IS - 1
ER -