Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry for adjuvant therapy response in pancreatic cancer

Standard

Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry for adjuvant therapy response in pancreatic cancer. / Klein, Fritz; Bahra, Marcus; Schirmeier, Anja; Al-Abadi, Hussein; Pratschke, Johann; Pelzer, Uwe; Oettle, Helmut; Striefler, Jana; Riess, Hanno; Sinn, Marianne.

in: J SURG ONCOL, Jahrgang 112, Nr. 1, 07.2015, S. 66-71.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Klein, F, Bahra, M, Schirmeier, A, Al-Abadi, H, Pratschke, J, Pelzer, U, Oettle, H, Striefler, J, Riess, H & Sinn, M 2015, 'Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry for adjuvant therapy response in pancreatic cancer', J SURG ONCOL, Jg. 112, Nr. 1, S. 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23951

APA

Klein, F., Bahra, M., Schirmeier, A., Al-Abadi, H., Pratschke, J., Pelzer, U., Oettle, H., Striefler, J., Riess, H., & Sinn, M. (2015). Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry for adjuvant therapy response in pancreatic cancer. J SURG ONCOL, 112(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23951

Vancouver

Klein F, Bahra M, Schirmeier A, Al-Abadi H, Pratschke J, Pelzer U et al. Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry for adjuvant therapy response in pancreatic cancer. J SURG ONCOL. 2015 Jul;112(1):66-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23951

Bibtex

@article{7a98ba7684454e19938711e709be2bb0,
title = "Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry for adjuvant therapy response in pancreatic cancer",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The continuous progress in treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has lead to a re-evaluation of prognostic markers. In this study the prognostic relevance of DNA Index and classical histopathological parameters with regard to disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed within the CONKO-001 patient population.METHODS: One hundred forty three fresh-frozen paraffin-embedded tissue samples of the resected tumor specimen of the CONKO-001 patient population were available for DNA index analysis to evaluate its impact on patient outcome.RESULTS: Median DFS (7.3 vs. 14.3 months; P = 0.004) and median OS (16.6 vs. 29.2 months; P = 0.011) were significantly decreased in patients with a high DNA index (>1.4). Multivariate analysis revealed both DNA index (DFS: P = 0.002; OS: P = 0.019) and tumor grading (DFS: P = 0.004; OS: P = 0.004) as individual prognostic markers for DFS and OS. The following prognostic subgroups were identified: good (low DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), intermediate (low DNA Index + G3 tumor grading or high DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), poor (high DNA Index + G3 tumor grading).CONCLUSION: The DNA index/tumor grading constellation may serve as a helpful guide for personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.",
keywords = "Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, DNA, Neoplasm/analysis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Image Cytometry/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Grading, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Tissue Array Analysis",
author = "Fritz Klein and Marcus Bahra and Anja Schirmeier and Hussein Al-Abadi and Johann Pratschke and Uwe Pelzer and Helmut Oettle and Jana Striefler and Hanno Riess and Marianne Sinn",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1002/jso.23951",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "66--71",
journal = "J SURG ONCOL",
issn = "0022-4790",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic significance of DNA cytometry for adjuvant therapy response in pancreatic cancer

AU - Klein, Fritz

AU - Bahra, Marcus

AU - Schirmeier, Anja

AU - Al-Abadi, Hussein

AU - Pratschke, Johann

AU - Pelzer, Uwe

AU - Oettle, Helmut

AU - Striefler, Jana

AU - Riess, Hanno

AU - Sinn, Marianne

N1 - © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The continuous progress in treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has lead to a re-evaluation of prognostic markers. In this study the prognostic relevance of DNA Index and classical histopathological parameters with regard to disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed within the CONKO-001 patient population.METHODS: One hundred forty three fresh-frozen paraffin-embedded tissue samples of the resected tumor specimen of the CONKO-001 patient population were available for DNA index analysis to evaluate its impact on patient outcome.RESULTS: Median DFS (7.3 vs. 14.3 months; P = 0.004) and median OS (16.6 vs. 29.2 months; P = 0.011) were significantly decreased in patients with a high DNA index (>1.4). Multivariate analysis revealed both DNA index (DFS: P = 0.002; OS: P = 0.019) and tumor grading (DFS: P = 0.004; OS: P = 0.004) as individual prognostic markers for DFS and OS. The following prognostic subgroups were identified: good (low DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), intermediate (low DNA Index + G3 tumor grading or high DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), poor (high DNA Index + G3 tumor grading).CONCLUSION: The DNA index/tumor grading constellation may serve as a helpful guide for personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The continuous progress in treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has lead to a re-evaluation of prognostic markers. In this study the prognostic relevance of DNA Index and classical histopathological parameters with regard to disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed within the CONKO-001 patient population.METHODS: One hundred forty three fresh-frozen paraffin-embedded tissue samples of the resected tumor specimen of the CONKO-001 patient population were available for DNA index analysis to evaluate its impact on patient outcome.RESULTS: Median DFS (7.3 vs. 14.3 months; P = 0.004) and median OS (16.6 vs. 29.2 months; P = 0.011) were significantly decreased in patients with a high DNA index (>1.4). Multivariate analysis revealed both DNA index (DFS: P = 0.002; OS: P = 0.019) and tumor grading (DFS: P = 0.004; OS: P = 0.004) as individual prognostic markers for DFS and OS. The following prognostic subgroups were identified: good (low DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), intermediate (low DNA Index + G3 tumor grading or high DNA Index + G1/2 tumor grading), poor (high DNA Index + G3 tumor grading).CONCLUSION: The DNA index/tumor grading constellation may serve as a helpful guide for personalized treatment recommendations for adjuvant therapy of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

KW - Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use

KW - Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis

KW - Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

KW - DNA, Neoplasm/analysis

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Image Cytometry/methods

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasm Grading

KW - Neoplasm Staging

KW - Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy

KW - Prognosis

KW - Survival Rate

KW - Tissue Array Analysis

U2 - 10.1002/jso.23951

DO - 10.1002/jso.23951

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26193339

VL - 112

SP - 66

EP - 71

JO - J SURG ONCOL

JF - J SURG ONCOL

SN - 0022-4790

IS - 1

ER -