Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer

Standard

Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer. / Mori, Keiichiro; Sharma, Vidit; Comperat, Eva M; Sato, Shun; Laukhtina, Ekaterina; Schuettfort, Victor M; Pradere, Benjamin; Sari Motlagh, Reza; Mostafaei, Hadi; Quhal, Fahad; Kardoust Parizi, Mehdi; Abufaraj, Mohammad; Karakiewicz, Pierre I; Egawa, Shin; Tilki, Derya; Boorjian, Stephen A; Shariat, Shahrokh F.

in: ANN SURG ONCOL, Jahrgang 28, Nr. 13, 12.2021, S. 9179-9187.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Mori, K, Sharma, V, Comperat, EM, Sato, S, Laukhtina, E, Schuettfort, VM, Pradere, B, Sari Motlagh, R, Mostafaei, H, Quhal, F, Kardoust Parizi, M, Abufaraj, M, Karakiewicz, PI, Egawa, S, Tilki, D, Boorjian, SA & Shariat, SF 2021, 'Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer', ANN SURG ONCOL, Jg. 28, Nr. 13, S. 9179-9187. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x

APA

Mori, K., Sharma, V., Comperat, E. M., Sato, S., Laukhtina, E., Schuettfort, V. M., Pradere, B., Sari Motlagh, R., Mostafaei, H., Quhal, F., Kardoust Parizi, M., Abufaraj, M., Karakiewicz, P. I., Egawa, S., Tilki, D., Boorjian, S. A., & Shariat, S. F. (2021). Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer. ANN SURG ONCOL, 28(13), 9179-9187. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x

Vancouver

Mori K, Sharma V, Comperat EM, Sato S, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM et al. Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer. ANN SURG ONCOL. 2021 Dez;28(13):9179-9187. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x

Bibtex

@article{bf1c59af5516461682d7a7bbab5dfd05,
title = "Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is considered a single entity; however, there are questions regarding prognostic heterogeneity. This study assessed the prognostic differences among various Gleason scores (GSs) classified as GG 4 PC on biopsy before radical prostatectomy (RP).METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, and a total of 1791 patients (GS 3 + 5: 190; GS 4 + 4: 1557; and GS 5 + 3: 44) with biopsy GG 4 were included for analysis. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with high-risk surgical pathologic features. Cox regression models were used to analyze time-dependent oncologic endpoints.RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 75 months, 750 patients (41.9%) experienced BCR, 146 (8.2%) died of any causes, and 57 (3.2%) died of PC. Biopsy GS 5 + 3 was associated with significantly higher rates of GS upgrading in RP specimens than GS 3 + 5 and GS 4 + 4. On multivariable analysis adjusted for clinicopathologic features, different GSs within GG 4 were significantly associated with BCR (p = 0.03) but not PC-specific or all-cause mortality. Study limitations include the lack of central pathological specimen evaluation.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GG 4 at biopsy exhibited some limited biological and clinical heterogeneity. Specifically, GS 5 + 3 had an increased risk of GS upgrading. This can help individualize patients' counseling and encourage further study to refine biopsy specimen-based GG classification.",
keywords = "Biopsy, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Grading, Prognosis, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery, Retrospective Studies",
author = "Keiichiro Mori and Vidit Sharma and Comperat, {Eva M} and Shun Sato and Ekaterina Laukhtina and Schuettfort, {Victor M} and Benjamin Pradere and {Sari Motlagh}, Reza and Hadi Mostafaei and Fahad Quhal and {Kardoust Parizi}, Mehdi and Mohammad Abufaraj and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I} and Shin Egawa and Derya Tilki and Boorjian, {Stephen A} and Shariat, {Shahrokh F}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021. The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "9179--9187",
journal = "ANN SURG ONCOL",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "13",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic Impact of Different Gleason Patterns on Biopsy Within Grade Group 4 Prostate Cancer

AU - Mori, Keiichiro

AU - Sharma, Vidit

AU - Comperat, Eva M

AU - Sato, Shun

AU - Laukhtina, Ekaterina

AU - Schuettfort, Victor M

AU - Pradere, Benjamin

AU - Sari Motlagh, Reza

AU - Mostafaei, Hadi

AU - Quhal, Fahad

AU - Kardoust Parizi, Mehdi

AU - Abufaraj, Mohammad

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

AU - Egawa, Shin

AU - Tilki, Derya

AU - Boorjian, Stephen A

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F

N1 - © 2021. The Author(s).

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is considered a single entity; however, there are questions regarding prognostic heterogeneity. This study assessed the prognostic differences among various Gleason scores (GSs) classified as GG 4 PC on biopsy before radical prostatectomy (RP).METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, and a total of 1791 patients (GS 3 + 5: 190; GS 4 + 4: 1557; and GS 5 + 3: 44) with biopsy GG 4 were included for analysis. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with high-risk surgical pathologic features. Cox regression models were used to analyze time-dependent oncologic endpoints.RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 75 months, 750 patients (41.9%) experienced BCR, 146 (8.2%) died of any causes, and 57 (3.2%) died of PC. Biopsy GS 5 + 3 was associated with significantly higher rates of GS upgrading in RP specimens than GS 3 + 5 and GS 4 + 4. On multivariable analysis adjusted for clinicopathologic features, different GSs within GG 4 were significantly associated with BCR (p = 0.03) but not PC-specific or all-cause mortality. Study limitations include the lack of central pathological specimen evaluation.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GG 4 at biopsy exhibited some limited biological and clinical heterogeneity. Specifically, GS 5 + 3 had an increased risk of GS upgrading. This can help individualize patients' counseling and encourage further study to refine biopsy specimen-based GG classification.

AB - BACKGROUND: Grade group (GG) 4 prostate cancer (PC) is considered a single entity; however, there are questions regarding prognostic heterogeneity. This study assessed the prognostic differences among various Gleason scores (GSs) classified as GG 4 PC on biopsy before radical prostatectomy (RP).METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, and a total of 1791 patients (GS 3 + 5: 190; GS 4 + 4: 1557; and GS 5 + 3: 44) with biopsy GG 4 were included for analysis. Biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with high-risk surgical pathologic features. Cox regression models were used to analyze time-dependent oncologic endpoints.RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 75 months, 750 patients (41.9%) experienced BCR, 146 (8.2%) died of any causes, and 57 (3.2%) died of PC. Biopsy GS 5 + 3 was associated with significantly higher rates of GS upgrading in RP specimens than GS 3 + 5 and GS 4 + 4. On multivariable analysis adjusted for clinicopathologic features, different GSs within GG 4 were significantly associated with BCR (p = 0.03) but not PC-specific or all-cause mortality. Study limitations include the lack of central pathological specimen evaluation.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GG 4 at biopsy exhibited some limited biological and clinical heterogeneity. Specifically, GS 5 + 3 had an increased risk of GS upgrading. This can help individualize patients' counseling and encourage further study to refine biopsy specimen-based GG classification.

KW - Biopsy

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Neoplasm Grading

KW - Prognosis

KW - Prostate-Specific Antigen

KW - Prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery

KW - Retrospective Studies

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x

DO - 10.1245/s10434-021-10257-x

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34117577

VL - 28

SP - 9179

EP - 9187

JO - ANN SURG ONCOL

JF - ANN SURG ONCOL

SN - 1068-9265

IS - 13

ER -