PortalPublikationenPro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes.

Pro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes.

Standard

Pro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes. / Kehler, U; Regelsberger, Jan; Gliemroth, J.

in: MINIM INVAS NEUROSUR, Jahrgang 46, Nr. 4, 4, 2003, S. 205-207.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Kehler, U, Regelsberger, J & Gliemroth, J 2003, 'Pro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes.', MINIM INVAS NEUROSUR, Jg. 46, Nr. 4, 4, S. 205-207. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14506563?dopt=Citation>

APA

Kehler, U., Regelsberger, J., & Gliemroth, J. (2003). Pro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes. MINIM INVAS NEUROSUR, 46(4), 205-207. [4]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14506563?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Kehler U, Regelsberger J, Gliemroth J. Pro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes. MINIM INVAS NEUROSUR. 2003;46(4):205-207. 4.

Bibtex

@article{15d46b3319d045d297baf509becd70c9,
title = "Pro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes.",
abstract = "Experience with more than 200 neuroendoscopic procedures taught us the advantages and disadvantages of the different endoscope designs. Using an endoscope with a sheath with separate channels for the endoscope, the instruments as well as for rinsing and suction we found advantages in rinsing properties, handling, and preciseness of instrument steering. On the other hand an endoscope with a sheath with a singular channel for the endoscope itself, the instruments, rinsing, and suction the advantages were better in visualization of the instruments, more available instruments, and easier extraction of larger specimen. The knowledge of these advantages makes it possible to select the adequate endoscope regarding its design, especially in more complicated cases.",
author = "U Kehler and Jan Regelsberger and J Gliemroth",
year = "2003",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "46",
pages = "205--207",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pro and cons of different designs of rigid endoscopes.

AU - Kehler, U

AU - Regelsberger, Jan

AU - Gliemroth, J

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Experience with more than 200 neuroendoscopic procedures taught us the advantages and disadvantages of the different endoscope designs. Using an endoscope with a sheath with separate channels for the endoscope, the instruments as well as for rinsing and suction we found advantages in rinsing properties, handling, and preciseness of instrument steering. On the other hand an endoscope with a sheath with a singular channel for the endoscope itself, the instruments, rinsing, and suction the advantages were better in visualization of the instruments, more available instruments, and easier extraction of larger specimen. The knowledge of these advantages makes it possible to select the adequate endoscope regarding its design, especially in more complicated cases.

AB - Experience with more than 200 neuroendoscopic procedures taught us the advantages and disadvantages of the different endoscope designs. Using an endoscope with a sheath with separate channels for the endoscope, the instruments as well as for rinsing and suction we found advantages in rinsing properties, handling, and preciseness of instrument steering. On the other hand an endoscope with a sheath with a singular channel for the endoscope itself, the instruments, rinsing, and suction the advantages were better in visualization of the instruments, more available instruments, and easier extraction of larger specimen. The knowledge of these advantages makes it possible to select the adequate endoscope regarding its design, especially in more complicated cases.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 46

SP - 205

EP - 207

IS - 4

M1 - 4

ER -