PortalPublikationenPrimary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric...

Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures

Standard

Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures. / Hoffmann, M; Hartel, M; Rueger, J M; Lehmann, W.

in: EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S, Jahrgang 40, Nr. 3, 06.2014, S. 273-7.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Hoffmann, M, Hartel, M, Rueger, JM & Lehmann, W 2014, 'Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures', EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S, Jg. 40, Nr. 3, S. 273-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0412-9

APA

Hoffmann, M., Hartel, M., Rueger, J. M., & Lehmann, W. (2014). Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures. EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S, 40(3), 273-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0412-9

Vancouver

Hoffmann M, Hartel M, Rueger JM, Lehmann W. Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures. EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S. 2014 Jun;40(3):273-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0412-9

Bibtex

@article{d1fba75507744c5c87b1c88636df6c08,
title = "Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Hip arthroplasty is rarely indicated in the treatment of per- and intertrochanteric femur fractures. Although the majority of fractures are amenable to closed- or open reduction and internal fixation (CRIF/ORIF), in some patients the complexity of the fracture or other patient-related factors may cause the orthopaedic surgeon to consider arthroplasty as the treatment of choice. Decision-making is challenging, and a reliable score has not yet been established.RESULTS: Reviewing literature, several predictors of inferior outcome after CRIF/ORIF in per- and intertrochanteric fractures such as age, gender, poor bone quality, hip osteoarthritis, operation time and postoperative weight-bearing restrictions have been identified. Based on the literature review, a novel Hamburg Per- and Intertrochanteric Fracture Score (HPIFS) is proposed to support decision-making for per- and intertrochanteric fracture treatment.CONCLUSIONS: CRIF/ORIF remain the workhorses in per- and intertrochanteric fracture management. Arthroplasty offers an advantageous treatment option for a well-defined patient and fracture collective. The HPIFS might support the decision-making process.",
author = "M Hoffmann and M Hartel and Rueger, {J M} and W Lehmann",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s00068-014-0412-9",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "273--7",
journal = "EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S",
issn = "1863-9933",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures

AU - Hoffmann, M

AU - Hartel, M

AU - Rueger, J M

AU - Lehmann, W

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - PURPOSE: Hip arthroplasty is rarely indicated in the treatment of per- and intertrochanteric femur fractures. Although the majority of fractures are amenable to closed- or open reduction and internal fixation (CRIF/ORIF), in some patients the complexity of the fracture or other patient-related factors may cause the orthopaedic surgeon to consider arthroplasty as the treatment of choice. Decision-making is challenging, and a reliable score has not yet been established.RESULTS: Reviewing literature, several predictors of inferior outcome after CRIF/ORIF in per- and intertrochanteric fractures such as age, gender, poor bone quality, hip osteoarthritis, operation time and postoperative weight-bearing restrictions have been identified. Based on the literature review, a novel Hamburg Per- and Intertrochanteric Fracture Score (HPIFS) is proposed to support decision-making for per- and intertrochanteric fracture treatment.CONCLUSIONS: CRIF/ORIF remain the workhorses in per- and intertrochanteric fracture management. Arthroplasty offers an advantageous treatment option for a well-defined patient and fracture collective. The HPIFS might support the decision-making process.

AB - PURPOSE: Hip arthroplasty is rarely indicated in the treatment of per- and intertrochanteric femur fractures. Although the majority of fractures are amenable to closed- or open reduction and internal fixation (CRIF/ORIF), in some patients the complexity of the fracture or other patient-related factors may cause the orthopaedic surgeon to consider arthroplasty as the treatment of choice. Decision-making is challenging, and a reliable score has not yet been established.RESULTS: Reviewing literature, several predictors of inferior outcome after CRIF/ORIF in per- and intertrochanteric fractures such as age, gender, poor bone quality, hip osteoarthritis, operation time and postoperative weight-bearing restrictions have been identified. Based on the literature review, a novel Hamburg Per- and Intertrochanteric Fracture Score (HPIFS) is proposed to support decision-making for per- and intertrochanteric fracture treatment.CONCLUSIONS: CRIF/ORIF remain the workhorses in per- and intertrochanteric fracture management. Arthroplasty offers an advantageous treatment option for a well-defined patient and fracture collective. The HPIFS might support the decision-making process.

U2 - 10.1007/s00068-014-0412-9

DO - 10.1007/s00068-014-0412-9

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26816060

VL - 40

SP - 273

EP - 277

JO - EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S

JF - EUR J TRAUMA EMERG S

SN - 1863-9933

IS - 3

ER -