Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1)

Standard

Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1). / Harter, Philipp; Hauke, Jan; Heitz, Florian; Reuss, Alexander; Kommoss, Stefan; Marmé, Frederik; Heimbach, André; Prieske, Katharina; Richters, Lisa; Burges, Alexander; Neidhardt, Guido; de Gregorio, Nikolaus; El-Balat, Ahmed; Hilpert, Felix; Meier, Werner; Kimmig, Rainer; Kast, Karin; Sehouli, Jalid; Baumann, Klaus; Jackisch, Christian; Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won; Hanker, Lars; Kröber, Sandra; Pfisterer, Jacobus; Gevensleben, Heidrun; Schnelzer, Andreas; Dietrich, Dimo; Neunhöffer, Tanja; Krockenberger, Mathias; Brucker, Sara Y; Nürnberg, Peter; Thiele, Holger; Altmüller, Janine; Lamla, Josefin; Elser, Gabriele; du Bois, Andreas; Hahnen, Eric; Schmutzler, Rita.

in: PLOS ONE, Jahrgang 12, Nr. 10, 2017, S. e0186043.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Harter, P, Hauke, J, Heitz, F, Reuss, A, Kommoss, S, Marmé, F, Heimbach, A, Prieske, K, Richters, L, Burges, A, Neidhardt, G, de Gregorio, N, El-Balat, A, Hilpert, F, Meier, W, Kimmig, R, Kast, K, Sehouli, J, Baumann, K, Jackisch, C, Park-Simon, T-W, Hanker, L, Kröber, S, Pfisterer, J, Gevensleben, H, Schnelzer, A, Dietrich, D, Neunhöffer, T, Krockenberger, M, Brucker, SY, Nürnberg, P, Thiele, H, Altmüller, J, Lamla, J, Elser, G, du Bois, A, Hahnen, E & Schmutzler, R 2017, 'Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1)', PLOS ONE, Jg. 12, Nr. 10, S. e0186043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186043

APA

Harter, P., Hauke, J., Heitz, F., Reuss, A., Kommoss, S., Marmé, F., Heimbach, A., Prieske, K., Richters, L., Burges, A., Neidhardt, G., de Gregorio, N., El-Balat, A., Hilpert, F., Meier, W., Kimmig, R., Kast, K., Sehouli, J., Baumann, K., ... Schmutzler, R. (2017). Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1). PLOS ONE, 12(10), e0186043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186043

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8448d04a1f7a4d7aa7d523fa0222fa28,
title = "Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1)",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated.METHODS: Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PMS2, PTEN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history.RESULTS: In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16-93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the BRCA1 (15.5%), BRCA2 (5.5%), RAD51C (2.5%) and PALB2 (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients ≥60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for BRCA1/2 would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes.CONCLUSIONS: 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to BRCA1/2 seems to be not sufficient.",
keywords = "Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Germ-Line Mutation, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Journal Article",
author = "Philipp Harter and Jan Hauke and Florian Heitz and Alexander Reuss and Stefan Kommoss and Frederik Marm{\'e} and Andr{\'e} Heimbach and Katharina Prieske and Lisa Richters and Alexander Burges and Guido Neidhardt and {de Gregorio}, Nikolaus and Ahmed El-Balat and Felix Hilpert and Werner Meier and Rainer Kimmig and Karin Kast and Jalid Sehouli and Klaus Baumann and Christian Jackisch and Tjoung-Won Park-Simon and Lars Hanker and Sandra Kr{\"o}ber and Jacobus Pfisterer and Heidrun Gevensleben and Andreas Schnelzer and Dimo Dietrich and Tanja Neunh{\"o}ffer and Mathias Krockenberger and Brucker, {Sara Y} and Peter N{\"u}rnberg and Holger Thiele and Janine Altm{\"u}ller and Josefin Lamla and Gabriele Elser and {du Bois}, Andreas and Eric Hahnen and Rita Schmutzler",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0186043",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "e0186043",
journal = "PLOS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including BRCA1/2 in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1)

AU - Harter, Philipp

AU - Hauke, Jan

AU - Heitz, Florian

AU - Reuss, Alexander

AU - Kommoss, Stefan

AU - Marmé, Frederik

AU - Heimbach, André

AU - Prieske, Katharina

AU - Richters, Lisa

AU - Burges, Alexander

AU - Neidhardt, Guido

AU - de Gregorio, Nikolaus

AU - El-Balat, Ahmed

AU - Hilpert, Felix

AU - Meier, Werner

AU - Kimmig, Rainer

AU - Kast, Karin

AU - Sehouli, Jalid

AU - Baumann, Klaus

AU - Jackisch, Christian

AU - Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won

AU - Hanker, Lars

AU - Kröber, Sandra

AU - Pfisterer, Jacobus

AU - Gevensleben, Heidrun

AU - Schnelzer, Andreas

AU - Dietrich, Dimo

AU - Neunhöffer, Tanja

AU - Krockenberger, Mathias

AU - Brucker, Sara Y

AU - Nürnberg, Peter

AU - Thiele, Holger

AU - Altmüller, Janine

AU - Lamla, Josefin

AU - Elser, Gabriele

AU - du Bois, Andreas

AU - Hahnen, Eric

AU - Schmutzler, Rita

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - BACKGROUND: Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated.METHODS: Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PMS2, PTEN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history.RESULTS: In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16-93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the BRCA1 (15.5%), BRCA2 (5.5%), RAD51C (2.5%) and PALB2 (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients ≥60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for BRCA1/2 would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes.CONCLUSIONS: 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to BRCA1/2 seems to be not sufficient.

AB - BACKGROUND: Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated.METHODS: Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, NBN, PMS2, PTEN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, STK11, TP53) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history.RESULTS: In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16-93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the BRCA1 (15.5%), BRCA2 (5.5%), RAD51C (2.5%) and PALB2 (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in BRCA1/2 (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients ≥60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for BRCA1/2 would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes.CONCLUSIONS: 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to BRCA1/2 seems to be not sufficient.

KW - Female

KW - Genes, BRCA1

KW - Genes, BRCA2

KW - Genetic Predisposition to Disease

KW - Germ-Line Mutation

KW - Humans

KW - Ovarian Neoplasms

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0186043

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0186043

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29053726

VL - 12

SP - e0186043

JO - PLOS ONE

JF - PLOS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

ER -