Prediction of volume-responsiveness during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload
Standard
Prediction of volume-responsiveness during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload. / Trepte, Constantin J C; Haas, Sebastian A; Nitzschke, Rainer; Salzwedel, Cornelie; Goetz, Alwin E; Reuter, Daniel A.
in: J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN, Jahrgang 27, Nr. 6, 01.12.2013, S. 1094-100.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of volume-responsiveness during one-lung ventilation: a comparison of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload
AU - Trepte, Constantin J C
AU - Haas, Sebastian A
AU - Nitzschke, Rainer
AU - Salzwedel, Cornelie
AU - Goetz, Alwin E
AU - Reuter, Daniel A
N1 - © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/12/1
Y1 - 2013/12/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload to predict volume responsiveness during one-lung ventilation (OLV).DESIGN: Prospective experimental study.SETTING: Laboratory of the animal facility of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three German domestic pigs.INTERVENTIONS: Hypovolemia was induced by withdrawing 20 mL/kg body weight (BW) of blood. OLV was established, and the volume withdrawn was re-transfused in 3 volume-loading steps, each consisting of 7 mL/kg BW. An ultrasonic flow probe around the pulmonary artery was used to measure the stroke-volume index (SVI) and to evaluate the volume response. An increase in the SVI of ≥ 15% was considered a positive response. For each measurement time point, central venous pressure (CVP), left atrial pressure (LAP), the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI), stroke-volume variation (SVV), and pulse-pressure variation (PPV) were recorded. The ability to predict volume responsiveness was assessed using ROC analysis.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 69 volume loading steps were performed, 48 of which showed a positive volume response. ROC analysis revealed the following area under the curve (AUC) values: CVP, 0.88; LAP, 0.65; GEDI, 0.75; SVV, 0.78; and PPV, 0.83. A comparison of the areas under the ROC curves did not reveal any statistically significant differences (p>0.05), with the exception of LAP compared with CVP (p = 0.005).CONCLUSIONS: Under these OLV experimental conditions, the volumetric and dynamic parameters of preload, as well as CVP, seemed to be of similar value in predicting volume responsiveness.
AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of static, volumetric, and dynamic parameters of cardiac preload to predict volume responsiveness during one-lung ventilation (OLV).DESIGN: Prospective experimental study.SETTING: Laboratory of the animal facility of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three German domestic pigs.INTERVENTIONS: Hypovolemia was induced by withdrawing 20 mL/kg body weight (BW) of blood. OLV was established, and the volume withdrawn was re-transfused in 3 volume-loading steps, each consisting of 7 mL/kg BW. An ultrasonic flow probe around the pulmonary artery was used to measure the stroke-volume index (SVI) and to evaluate the volume response. An increase in the SVI of ≥ 15% was considered a positive response. For each measurement time point, central venous pressure (CVP), left atrial pressure (LAP), the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDI), stroke-volume variation (SVV), and pulse-pressure variation (PPV) were recorded. The ability to predict volume responsiveness was assessed using ROC analysis.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 69 volume loading steps were performed, 48 of which showed a positive volume response. ROC analysis revealed the following area under the curve (AUC) values: CVP, 0.88; LAP, 0.65; GEDI, 0.75; SVV, 0.78; and PPV, 0.83. A comparison of the areas under the ROC curves did not reveal any statistically significant differences (p>0.05), with the exception of LAP compared with CVP (p = 0.005).CONCLUSIONS: Under these OLV experimental conditions, the volumetric and dynamic parameters of preload, as well as CVP, seemed to be of similar value in predicting volume responsiveness.
U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.05.003
DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.05.003
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 23972740
VL - 27
SP - 1094
EP - 1100
JO - J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN
JF - J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN
SN - 1053-0770
IS - 6
ER -