Pragmatic fluid optimization in high-risk surgery patients: when pragmatism dilutes the benefits
Standard
Pragmatic fluid optimization in high-risk surgery patients: when pragmatism dilutes the benefits. / Reuter, Daniel.
in: CRIT CARE, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 1, 1, 01.01.2012, S. 106.Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pragmatic fluid optimization in high-risk surgery patients: when pragmatism dilutes the benefits
AU - Reuter, Daniel
PY - 2012/1/1
Y1 - 2012/1/1
N2 - There is increasing evidence that hemodynamic optimization by fluid loading, particularly when performed in the early phase of surgery, is beneficial in high-risk surgery patients: it leads to a reduction in postoperative complications and even to improved long-term outcome. However, it is also true that goal- directed strategies of fluid optimization focusing on cardiac output optimization have not been applied in the clinical routine of many institutions. Reasons are manifold: disbelief in the level of evidence and on the accuracy and practicability of the required monitoring systems, and economics. The FOCCUS trial examined perioperative fluid optimization with a very basic approach: a standardized volume load with 25 ml/kg crystalloids over 6 hours immediately prior to scheduled surgery in high-risk patients. The hypothesis was that this intervention would lead to a compensation of preoperative fluid deficit caused by overnight fasting, and would result in improved perioperative fluid homeostasis with less postoperative complications and earlier hospital discharge. However, the primary study endpoints did not improve significantly. This observation points towards the facts that: firstly, the differentiation between interstitial fluid deficit caused by fasting and intravascular volume loss due to acute blood loss must be recognized in treatment strategies; secondly, the type of fluid replacement may play an important role; and thirdly, protocolized treatment strategies should also always be tailored to suit the patients' individual needs in every individual clinical situation.
AB - There is increasing evidence that hemodynamic optimization by fluid loading, particularly when performed in the early phase of surgery, is beneficial in high-risk surgery patients: it leads to a reduction in postoperative complications and even to improved long-term outcome. However, it is also true that goal- directed strategies of fluid optimization focusing on cardiac output optimization have not been applied in the clinical routine of many institutions. Reasons are manifold: disbelief in the level of evidence and on the accuracy and practicability of the required monitoring systems, and economics. The FOCCUS trial examined perioperative fluid optimization with a very basic approach: a standardized volume load with 25 ml/kg crystalloids over 6 hours immediately prior to scheduled surgery in high-risk patients. The hypothesis was that this intervention would lead to a compensation of preoperative fluid deficit caused by overnight fasting, and would result in improved perioperative fluid homeostasis with less postoperative complications and earlier hospital discharge. However, the primary study endpoints did not improve significantly. This observation points towards the facts that: firstly, the differentiation between interstitial fluid deficit caused by fasting and intravascular volume loss due to acute blood loss must be recognized in treatment strategies; secondly, the type of fluid replacement may play an important role; and thirdly, protocolized treatment strategies should also always be tailored to suit the patients' individual needs in every individual clinical situation.
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Fluid Therapy/methods
KW - Preoperative Care/methods
KW - Surgical Procedures, Elective/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Fluid Therapy/methods
KW - Preoperative Care/methods
KW - Surgical Procedures, Elective/methods
U2 - 10.1186/cc10604
DO - 10.1186/cc10604
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 22410167
VL - 16
SP - 106
JO - CRIT CARE
JF - CRIT CARE
SN - 1364-8535
IS - 1
M1 - 1
ER -