Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study

A Rashad; P Sadr-Eshkevari; M Heiland; R Smeets; N Prochnow; E Hoffmann; P Maurer

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.004

Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study

Standard

Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study. / Rashad, A; Sadr-Eshkevari, P; Heiland, M; Smeets, R; Prochnow, N; Hoffmann, E; Maurer, P.

in: INT J ORAL MAX SURG, Jahrgang 44, Nr. 2, 01.02.2015, S. 203-8.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Rashad, A, Sadr-Eshkevari, P, Heiland, M, Smeets, R, Prochnow, N, Hoffmann, E & Maurer, P 2015, 'Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study', INT J ORAL MAX SURG, Jg. 44, Nr. 2, S. 203-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.004

APA

Rashad, A., Sadr-Eshkevari, P., Heiland, M., Smeets, R., Prochnow, N., Hoffmann, E., & Maurer, P. (2015). Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study. INT J ORAL MAX SURG, 44(2), 203-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.004

Vancouver

Rashad A, Sadr-Eshkevari P, Heiland M, Smeets R, Prochnow N, Hoffmann E et al. Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study. INT J ORAL MAX SURG. 2015 Feb 1;44(2):203-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.004

Bibtex

@article{b267009ab3814d18a63d7652b8ef5a58,

title = "Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study",

abstract = "The aim of the present study was to compare subjective experiences using bur, ultrasonic, and sonic osteotomy systems. Ten novice (N) and 10 expert (E) practitioners performed osteotomies on bovine ribs with each system. They scored ease of handling and sense of accuracy on visual analogue scales. The duration of the osteotomy procedure and the amount of noise were recorded objectively. Learning experience was evaluated in a second run. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used for the statistical analyses. The sonic system was significantly slower, with the worst noise impact (92.9dB; standard deviation (SD) 7.1). However, both user groups improved significantly in the second run (N 7.9, E 7.6). There were no significant differences in handling. The sense of accuracy was evaluated to be significantly best for the sonic system (N 8.4, E 8.4), compared to the ultrasonic system (N 7.1, E 7.1; both P=0.043) and bur system (N 5.5, P=0.002; E 6.0, P=0.006). The practitioners had a promising experience with the application of the ultrasonic system and particularly with the sonic system.",

author = "A Rashad and P Sadr-Eshkevari and M Heiland and R Smeets and N Prochnow and E Hoffmann and P Maurer",

year = "2015",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.004",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "203--8",

journal = "INT J ORAL MAX SURG",

issn = "0901-5027",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioner experience with sonic osteotomy compared to bur and ultrasonic saw: a pilot in vitro study

AU - Rashad, A

AU - Sadr-Eshkevari, P

AU - Heiland, M

AU - Smeets, R

AU - Prochnow, N

AU - Hoffmann, E

AU - Maurer, P

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - The aim of the present study was to compare subjective experiences using bur, ultrasonic, and sonic osteotomy systems. Ten novice (N) and 10 expert (E) practitioners performed osteotomies on bovine ribs with each system. They scored ease of handling and sense of accuracy on visual analogue scales. The duration of the osteotomy procedure and the amount of noise were recorded objectively. Learning experience was evaluated in a second run. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used for the statistical analyses. The sonic system was significantly slower, with the worst noise impact (92.9dB; standard deviation (SD) 7.1). However, both user groups improved significantly in the second run (N 7.9, E 7.6). There were no significant differences in handling. The sense of accuracy was evaluated to be significantly best for the sonic system (N 8.4, E 8.4), compared to the ultrasonic system (N 7.1, E 7.1; both P=0.043) and bur system (N 5.5, P=0.002; E 6.0, P=0.006). The practitioners had a promising experience with the application of the ultrasonic system and particularly with the sonic system.

AB - The aim of the present study was to compare subjective experiences using bur, ultrasonic, and sonic osteotomy systems. Ten novice (N) and 10 expert (E) practitioners performed osteotomies on bovine ribs with each system. They scored ease of handling and sense of accuracy on visual analogue scales. The duration of the osteotomy procedure and the amount of noise were recorded objectively. Learning experience was evaluated in a second run. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used for the statistical analyses. The sonic system was significantly slower, with the worst noise impact (92.9dB; standard deviation (SD) 7.1). However, both user groups improved significantly in the second run (N 7.9, E 7.6). There were no significant differences in handling. The sense of accuracy was evaluated to be significantly best for the sonic system (N 8.4, E 8.4), compared to the ultrasonic system (N 7.1, E 7.1; both P=0.043) and bur system (N 5.5, P=0.002; E 6.0, P=0.006). The practitioners had a promising experience with the application of the ultrasonic system and particularly with the sonic system.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.004

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25277806

VL - 44

SP - 203

EP - 208

JO - INT J ORAL MAX SURG

JF - INT J ORAL MAX SURG

SN - 0901-5027

IS - 2

ER -