Post mortem CT scans as a supplementary teaching method in gross anatomy

Standard

Post mortem CT scans as a supplementary teaching method in gross anatomy. / Buenting, Mara; Mueller, Tjark; Raupach, Tobias; Luers, Georg; Wehrenberg, Uwe; Gehl, Axel; Anders, Sven.

in: ANN ANAT, Jahrgang 208, 11.2016, S. 165-169.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{db5ffed032f64c229bfbe217f7fa46d6,
title = "Post mortem CT scans as a supplementary teaching method in gross anatomy",
abstract = "Despite increasing the integration of radiologic imaging teaching in anatomy dissection courses, studies on learning outcome of these interventions are rare or have certain shortcomings in study design. In this study, students were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n=53) receiving five weekly CT-courses of 30min duration during a 6-week gross anatomy course. Students in the control group (n=329) received no additional teaching. Total teaching time did not differ among groups. All students were asked to participate in a pre- and post-course self-assessment (comparative self-assessment; CSA) of learning objectives related to anatomical spatial relationships and a post-course formative assessment on radiologic anatomy. Items of both assessments were matched. Moreover, students of the intervention group were asked to evaluate the CT-courses. Most participants of the intervention group classified the CT-courses as {"}good{"} or {"}very good{"}. Nevertheless, results of the CSA and formative assessment did not differ among study and control groups. These findings indicate that the teaching intervention (CT-courses) did not have an impact on recognition of anatomical structures in radiological images beyond the knowledge acquired in the anatomical dissection course. As a consequence, interventions integrating radiology imaging into dissection courses should be based on psychological considerations of how to best foster student learning. Learning outcome has to be monitored, as results of evaluation surveys can be misleading. Further research on curricular concepts is needed considering both short- and long-term effects.",
author = "Mara Buenting and Tjark Mueller and Tobias Raupach and Georg Luers and Uwe Wehrenberg and Axel Gehl and Sven Anders",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.003",
language = "English",
volume = "208",
pages = "165--169",
journal = "ANN ANAT",
issn = "0940-9602",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post mortem CT scans as a supplementary teaching method in gross anatomy

AU - Buenting, Mara

AU - Mueller, Tjark

AU - Raupach, Tobias

AU - Luers, Georg

AU - Wehrenberg, Uwe

AU - Gehl, Axel

AU - Anders, Sven

N1 - Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/11

Y1 - 2016/11

N2 - Despite increasing the integration of radiologic imaging teaching in anatomy dissection courses, studies on learning outcome of these interventions are rare or have certain shortcomings in study design. In this study, students were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n=53) receiving five weekly CT-courses of 30min duration during a 6-week gross anatomy course. Students in the control group (n=329) received no additional teaching. Total teaching time did not differ among groups. All students were asked to participate in a pre- and post-course self-assessment (comparative self-assessment; CSA) of learning objectives related to anatomical spatial relationships and a post-course formative assessment on radiologic anatomy. Items of both assessments were matched. Moreover, students of the intervention group were asked to evaluate the CT-courses. Most participants of the intervention group classified the CT-courses as "good" or "very good". Nevertheless, results of the CSA and formative assessment did not differ among study and control groups. These findings indicate that the teaching intervention (CT-courses) did not have an impact on recognition of anatomical structures in radiological images beyond the knowledge acquired in the anatomical dissection course. As a consequence, interventions integrating radiology imaging into dissection courses should be based on psychological considerations of how to best foster student learning. Learning outcome has to be monitored, as results of evaluation surveys can be misleading. Further research on curricular concepts is needed considering both short- and long-term effects.

AB - Despite increasing the integration of radiologic imaging teaching in anatomy dissection courses, studies on learning outcome of these interventions are rare or have certain shortcomings in study design. In this study, students were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n=53) receiving five weekly CT-courses of 30min duration during a 6-week gross anatomy course. Students in the control group (n=329) received no additional teaching. Total teaching time did not differ among groups. All students were asked to participate in a pre- and post-course self-assessment (comparative self-assessment; CSA) of learning objectives related to anatomical spatial relationships and a post-course formative assessment on radiologic anatomy. Items of both assessments were matched. Moreover, students of the intervention group were asked to evaluate the CT-courses. Most participants of the intervention group classified the CT-courses as "good" or "very good". Nevertheless, results of the CSA and formative assessment did not differ among study and control groups. These findings indicate that the teaching intervention (CT-courses) did not have an impact on recognition of anatomical structures in radiological images beyond the knowledge acquired in the anatomical dissection course. As a consequence, interventions integrating radiology imaging into dissection courses should be based on psychological considerations of how to best foster student learning. Learning outcome has to be monitored, as results of evaluation surveys can be misleading. Further research on curricular concepts is needed considering both short- and long-term effects.

U2 - 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.003

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 27210060

VL - 208

SP - 165

EP - 169

JO - ANN ANAT

JF - ANN ANAT

SN - 0940-9602

ER -