Poplitealarterienaneurysma - Was ist die beste behandlungsoption? Literaturübersicht und aufruf zu einer registerstudie

Standard

Poplitealarterienaneurysma - Was ist die beste behandlungsoption? Literaturübersicht und aufruf zu einer registerstudie. / Schmitz-Rixen, T.; Debus, E. S.; Torsello, G.; Stojanovic, T.; Peter, J.; Eckstein, H. H.; Grundmann, R. T.

in: GEFASSCHIRURGIE, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 5, 08.2014, S. 459-467.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ReviewForschung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e8a38699530e4598b530506668ad1a99,
title = "Poplitealarterienaneurysma - Was ist die beste behandlungsoption? Literatur{\"u}bersicht und aufruf zu einer registerstudie",
abstract = "Evidence-based statements on the question whether popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) should be treated by endovascular means or by open surgery are lacking. Overall, there are no major safety concerns regarding endovascular treatment which has resulted in some European countries establishing databases to document the results of treatment of PAA. The present paper explains why Germany should also undertake such a registry. The alternative of a prospective randomized trial, as initiated for asymptomatic patients under the clinical trials number NCT01817660 in the USA is also discussed. Due to the expected long recruitment period in view of the low prevalence of the disease, this alternative is not a realistic option in Germany. In addition, numerous exclusion criteria and the inherent stratification of a randomized trial would lower the relevance of such a study. Therefore, it would be more appropriate to register the nationwide results of all forms of PAA (i.e. symptomatic, asymptomatic and thrombosis as an emergency indication) and to evaluate the amputation rates. The concept of a nationwide German registry is presented.",
keywords = "Endovascular exclusion, Open surgical repair, Popliteal artery aneurysm, Randomized study, Registry",
author = "T. Schmitz-Rixen and Debus, {E. S.} and G. Torsello and T. Stojanovic and J. Peter and Eckstein, {H. H.} and Grundmann, {R. T.}",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1007/s00772-014-1368-0",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "19",
pages = "459--467",
journal = "GEFASSCHIRURGIE",
issn = "0948-7034",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poplitealarterienaneurysma - Was ist die beste behandlungsoption? Literaturübersicht und aufruf zu einer registerstudie

AU - Schmitz-Rixen, T.

AU - Debus, E. S.

AU - Torsello, G.

AU - Stojanovic, T.

AU - Peter, J.

AU - Eckstein, H. H.

AU - Grundmann, R. T.

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - Evidence-based statements on the question whether popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) should be treated by endovascular means or by open surgery are lacking. Overall, there are no major safety concerns regarding endovascular treatment which has resulted in some European countries establishing databases to document the results of treatment of PAA. The present paper explains why Germany should also undertake such a registry. The alternative of a prospective randomized trial, as initiated for asymptomatic patients under the clinical trials number NCT01817660 in the USA is also discussed. Due to the expected long recruitment period in view of the low prevalence of the disease, this alternative is not a realistic option in Germany. In addition, numerous exclusion criteria and the inherent stratification of a randomized trial would lower the relevance of such a study. Therefore, it would be more appropriate to register the nationwide results of all forms of PAA (i.e. symptomatic, asymptomatic and thrombosis as an emergency indication) and to evaluate the amputation rates. The concept of a nationwide German registry is presented.

AB - Evidence-based statements on the question whether popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) should be treated by endovascular means or by open surgery are lacking. Overall, there are no major safety concerns regarding endovascular treatment which has resulted in some European countries establishing databases to document the results of treatment of PAA. The present paper explains why Germany should also undertake such a registry. The alternative of a prospective randomized trial, as initiated for asymptomatic patients under the clinical trials number NCT01817660 in the USA is also discussed. Due to the expected long recruitment period in view of the low prevalence of the disease, this alternative is not a realistic option in Germany. In addition, numerous exclusion criteria and the inherent stratification of a randomized trial would lower the relevance of such a study. Therefore, it would be more appropriate to register the nationwide results of all forms of PAA (i.e. symptomatic, asymptomatic and thrombosis as an emergency indication) and to evaluate the amputation rates. The concept of a nationwide German registry is presented.

KW - Endovascular exclusion

KW - Open surgical repair

KW - Popliteal artery aneurysm

KW - Randomized study

KW - Registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937520859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00772-014-1368-0

DO - 10.1007/s00772-014-1368-0

M3 - SCORING: Review

AN - SCOPUS:84937520859

VL - 19

SP - 459

EP - 467

JO - GEFASSCHIRURGIE

JF - GEFASSCHIRURGIE

SN - 0948-7034

IS - 5

ER -