Point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing in German emergency rooms - a cost-benefit analysis

Standard

Point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing in German emergency rooms - a cost-benefit analysis. / Diel, R; Nienhaus, A.

in: PULMONOLOGY, Jahrgang 28, Nr. 3, 2022, S. 164-172.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{97f782d0e2ec4a559c0c79a46de57f42,
title = "Point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing in German emergency rooms - a cost-benefit analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The current COVID-19 pandemic is causing significant morbidity and death worldwide and produces significant socio-economic losses.OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-benefit relation of implementing point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing (POCT) in emergency rooms (ER) of German hospitals.METHODS: A deterministic decision-analytic model simulated the incremental costs of using the Sofia{\textregistered} SARS Antigen FIA test compared to those of using clinical judgement alone to confirm or exclude COVID-19 in adult patients in German ER, prior to hospitalization. Direct and indirect costs, with and without subsequent RT-PCR confirmation, were evaluated from the hospital perspective.RESULTS: With respect to ER patients, in base-case analysis, considering a COVID-19 prevalence of 15.6% and a hospitalization rate among COVID-19 suspects of 10.1%, POCT testing reduces average costs of hospitalized patients by €213 per tested patient if nasopharyngeal swabs of patients suspected to have COVID-19 are also sent to external labs for RT-PCR testing. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, under all reasonable assumptions, implementing the Sofia{\textregistered} SARS Antigen FIA saves on average about €210 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. The major part of cost savings, €159 or 75.9%, is due to the POC test´s high specificity resulting in a 21-fold lower proportion of unnecessary bed blocking at the first day of hospitalization.CONCLUSIONS: Using highly specific rapid COVID-19 tests in COVID-19 suspects at German ER, despite of their sub-optimal sensitivity, may significantly reduce hospital expenditure.",
author = "R Diel and A Nienhaus",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier Espa{\~n}a, S.L.U. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.06.009",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "164--172",
journal = "PULMONOLOGY",
issn = "2531-0437",
publisher = "Elsevier Espana",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing in German emergency rooms - a cost-benefit analysis

AU - Diel, R

AU - Nienhaus, A

N1 - Copyright © 2021 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - BACKGROUND: The current COVID-19 pandemic is causing significant morbidity and death worldwide and produces significant socio-economic losses.OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-benefit relation of implementing point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing (POCT) in emergency rooms (ER) of German hospitals.METHODS: A deterministic decision-analytic model simulated the incremental costs of using the Sofia® SARS Antigen FIA test compared to those of using clinical judgement alone to confirm or exclude COVID-19 in adult patients in German ER, prior to hospitalization. Direct and indirect costs, with and without subsequent RT-PCR confirmation, were evaluated from the hospital perspective.RESULTS: With respect to ER patients, in base-case analysis, considering a COVID-19 prevalence of 15.6% and a hospitalization rate among COVID-19 suspects of 10.1%, POCT testing reduces average costs of hospitalized patients by €213 per tested patient if nasopharyngeal swabs of patients suspected to have COVID-19 are also sent to external labs for RT-PCR testing. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, under all reasonable assumptions, implementing the Sofia® SARS Antigen FIA saves on average about €210 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. The major part of cost savings, €159 or 75.9%, is due to the POC test´s high specificity resulting in a 21-fold lower proportion of unnecessary bed blocking at the first day of hospitalization.CONCLUSIONS: Using highly specific rapid COVID-19 tests in COVID-19 suspects at German ER, despite of their sub-optimal sensitivity, may significantly reduce hospital expenditure.

AB - BACKGROUND: The current COVID-19 pandemic is causing significant morbidity and death worldwide and produces significant socio-economic losses.OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-benefit relation of implementing point-of-care COVID-19 antigen testing (POCT) in emergency rooms (ER) of German hospitals.METHODS: A deterministic decision-analytic model simulated the incremental costs of using the Sofia® SARS Antigen FIA test compared to those of using clinical judgement alone to confirm or exclude COVID-19 in adult patients in German ER, prior to hospitalization. Direct and indirect costs, with and without subsequent RT-PCR confirmation, were evaluated from the hospital perspective.RESULTS: With respect to ER patients, in base-case analysis, considering a COVID-19 prevalence of 15.6% and a hospitalization rate among COVID-19 suspects of 10.1%, POCT testing reduces average costs of hospitalized patients by €213 per tested patient if nasopharyngeal swabs of patients suspected to have COVID-19 are also sent to external labs for RT-PCR testing. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, under all reasonable assumptions, implementing the Sofia® SARS Antigen FIA saves on average about €210 as compared to applying the clinical-judgement-only strategy. The major part of cost savings, €159 or 75.9%, is due to the POC test´s high specificity resulting in a 21-fold lower proportion of unnecessary bed blocking at the first day of hospitalization.CONCLUSIONS: Using highly specific rapid COVID-19 tests in COVID-19 suspects at German ER, despite of their sub-optimal sensitivity, may significantly reduce hospital expenditure.

U2 - 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2021.06.009

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34315687

VL - 28

SP - 164

EP - 172

JO - PULMONOLOGY

JF - PULMONOLOGY

SN - 2531-0437

IS - 3

ER -