Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.

Standard

Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics. / Klocke, Arndt; Korbmacher, Heike M; Huck, Lothar G; Ghosh, Joydeep; Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel.

in: AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, Jahrgang 124, Nr. 3, 3, 2003, S. 309-315.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Klocke A, Korbmacher HM, Huck LG, Ghosh J, Kahl-Nieke B. Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics. AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC. 2003;124(3):309-315. 3.

Bibtex

@article{9cf63fb963e944818848a62bec014f1c,
title = "Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.",
abstract = "The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate bond strength and debonding characteristics when a xenon plasma arc curing light is used to bond polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Brackets were bonded to 240 extracted bovine mandibular incisors with a composite adhesive. Curing intervals of 1, 3, and 6 seconds were chosen for curing with the plasma arc light, and the control group was cured at 10 seconds per bracket with a conventional halogen light. Debonding was performed on a universal testing machine and according to the bracket manufacturers' recommendations. Both the polycrystalline and the monocrystalline brackets consistently debonded at the bracket-adhesive interface, regardless of debonding method, curing interval, or curing light. No enamel fractures were observed after debonding. Bracket fractures were rare and did not affect debonding. Bond strength was significantly higher for the monocrystalline brackets (P",
author = "Arndt Klocke and Korbmacher, {Heike M} and Huck, {Lothar G} and Joydeep Ghosh and B{\"a}rbel Kahl-Nieke",
year = "2003",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "124",
pages = "309--315",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.

AU - Klocke, Arndt

AU - Korbmacher, Heike M

AU - Huck, Lothar G

AU - Ghosh, Joydeep

AU - Kahl-Nieke, Bärbel

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate bond strength and debonding characteristics when a xenon plasma arc curing light is used to bond polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Brackets were bonded to 240 extracted bovine mandibular incisors with a composite adhesive. Curing intervals of 1, 3, and 6 seconds were chosen for curing with the plasma arc light, and the control group was cured at 10 seconds per bracket with a conventional halogen light. Debonding was performed on a universal testing machine and according to the bracket manufacturers' recommendations. Both the polycrystalline and the monocrystalline brackets consistently debonded at the bracket-adhesive interface, regardless of debonding method, curing interval, or curing light. No enamel fractures were observed after debonding. Bracket fractures were rare and did not affect debonding. Bond strength was significantly higher for the monocrystalline brackets (P

AB - The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate bond strength and debonding characteristics when a xenon plasma arc curing light is used to bond polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Brackets were bonded to 240 extracted bovine mandibular incisors with a composite adhesive. Curing intervals of 1, 3, and 6 seconds were chosen for curing with the plasma arc light, and the control group was cured at 10 seconds per bracket with a conventional halogen light. Debonding was performed on a universal testing machine and according to the bracket manufacturers' recommendations. Both the polycrystalline and the monocrystalline brackets consistently debonded at the bracket-adhesive interface, regardless of debonding method, curing interval, or curing light. No enamel fractures were observed after debonding. Bracket fractures were rare and did not affect debonding. Bond strength was significantly higher for the monocrystalline brackets (P

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 124

SP - 309

EP - 315

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -